The association of assisted reproductive technology with fetal malpresentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Konstantinos Stavridis, Maria Pisimisi, Olga Triantafyllidou, Theodoros Kalampokas, Nikolaos Vlahos, Stavroula L Kastora
{"title":"The association of assisted reproductive technology with fetal malpresentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Konstantinos Stavridis, Maria Pisimisi, Olga Triantafyllidou, Theodoros Kalampokas, Nikolaos Vlahos, Stavroula L Kastora","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2313143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its introduction, assisted reproductive technology (ART) has developed into a common clinical practice around the world; yet it still raises a lot of questions. Throughout time, many researchers have investigated its association with several obstetric incidences and its consequences on perinatal outcomes. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to estimate the correlation between ART procedures and malpresentation of the fetus in singleton pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered under the PROSPERO database (CRD42023458084). Five databases (Embase, MEDLINE<sup>®</sup>, APA PsycInfo, Global Health, Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)) and two additional sources were searched from inception to 31 May 2023. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-1 scale, whilst quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Summative and subgroup data as well as heterogeneity were generated by the Cochrane platform RevMan Web.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11 studies were included in the study with a total of 3,360,134 deliveries. Results indicate a higher risk of malpresentation at delivery in fetuses conceived through ART than those conceived naturally (RR: 1.50, (95% confidence interval (CI):1.30, 1.73)). This risk decreased when adjustments for potential confounders were applied (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.02, 1.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on observational studies, this meta-analysis indicated that singleton pregnancies conceived through ART are associated with higher risk of malpresentation than those conceived naturally, albeit the difference was lower when potential confounders were examined. Thus, future large studies are required to better understand possible reversible and irreversible factors of this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2313143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2313143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since its introduction, assisted reproductive technology (ART) has developed into a common clinical practice around the world; yet it still raises a lot of questions. Throughout time, many researchers have investigated its association with several obstetric incidences and its consequences on perinatal outcomes. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to estimate the correlation between ART procedures and malpresentation of the fetus in singleton pregnancies.

Methods: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered under the PROSPERO database (CRD42023458084). Five databases (Embase, MEDLINE®, APA PsycInfo, Global Health, Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)) and two additional sources were searched from inception to 31 May 2023. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-1 scale, whilst quality of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Summative and subgroup data as well as heterogeneity were generated by the Cochrane platform RevMan Web.

Results: Overall, 11 studies were included in the study with a total of 3,360,134 deliveries. Results indicate a higher risk of malpresentation at delivery in fetuses conceived through ART than those conceived naturally (RR: 1.50, (95% confidence interval (CI):1.30, 1.73)). This risk decreased when adjustments for potential confounders were applied (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.02, 1.23).

Conclusions: Based on observational studies, this meta-analysis indicated that singleton pregnancies conceived through ART are associated with higher risk of malpresentation than those conceived naturally, albeit the difference was lower when potential confounders were examined. Thus, future large studies are required to better understand possible reversible and irreversible factors of this relationship.

辅助生殖技术与胎儿畸形的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:辅助生殖技术(ART)自问世以来,已发展成为全球普遍的临床实践,但仍引发了许多问题。一直以来,许多研究人员都在调查辅助生殖技术与几种产科疾病的关联及其对围产期结果的影响。本次荟萃分析的目的是估算抗逆转录病毒疗法与单胎妊娠胎儿畸形之间的相关性:本研究根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行,并在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42023458084)中进行了前瞻性注册。研究人员检索了五个数据库(Embase、MEDLINE®、APA PsycInfo、Global Health、Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC))和两个其他来源,检索时间从开始至 2023 年 5 月 31 日。纳入研究的质量采用 ROBINS-1 量表进行评估,证据质量则采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架进行评估。总和数据、亚组数据以及异质性数据由 Cochrane 平台 RevMan Web 生成:研究共纳入了 11 项研究,总计 3,360,134 例分娩。结果表明,与自然受孕的胎儿相比,通过抗逆转录病毒疗法受孕的胎儿在分娩时出现胎位不正的风险更高(RR:1.50,(95% 置信区间(CI):1.30,1.73))。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,这一风险有所降低(RR = 1.12,95% 置信区间:1.02, 1.23):基于观察性研究,该荟萃分析表明,通过抗逆转录病毒疗法受孕的单胎妊娠比自然受孕的单胎妊娠发生胎位不正的风险更高,尽管在对潜在的混杂因素进行检查后,差异有所降低。因此,今后需要开展大型研究,以更好地了解这种关系中可能存在的可逆和不可逆因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信