Which intellectual activities are related to cognitive reserve? Introduction and testing a three-dimensional model.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Hossein Karsazi, Tara Rezapour, Atieh Sadat Mottaghi Ghamsari, Reza Kormi-Nouri, Javad Hatami
{"title":"Which intellectual activities are related to cognitive reserve? Introduction and testing a three-dimensional model.","authors":"Hossein Karsazi, Tara Rezapour, Atieh Sadat Mottaghi Ghamsari, Reza Kormi-Nouri, Javad Hatami","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-01926-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A common belief among people and some researchers is that keeping yourself mentally active may decrease the risk of dementia. Over the past years, despite widespread efforts to identify proxies for protecting cognitive reserve against age-related changes, it is still not clear what type of intellectual activity would be beneficial for cognitive reserve. To fill this gap, we propose a three-dimensional model of intellectual activity. According to this conceptual model, intellectual activities could be distinguished based on their locations in a three-dimensions space, including; (1) Activation: active vs. passive, (2) Novelty: novel vs. familiar, and (3) Productivity: productive vs. receptive. We assumed that the activities that are categorized as more active, novel, and productive could be considered as a cognitive reserve proxy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To test this hypothesis, a sample of 237 participants older than 50 years (M<sub>age</sub> = 58.76 ± 6.66; 63.7% women) was recruited to take part in the study. Episodic, semantic and working memory were assessed with computerized battery tests (Sepidar) and a self-report questionnaire was used to assess intellectual activities. Activities were categorized in terms of; (1) passive, familiar, and receptive activities (radio/watching TV), (2) active, familiar, and receptive activities (solving crosswords), (3) active, novel, and receptive activities (reading), and (4) active, novel, and productive activities (writing).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that writing moderates the effect of age on episodic and semantic memory. Reading only moderates the effect of age on semantic memory, and radio/watching TV and solving crosswords do not play a role in moderation analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our finding suggests that intellectual activities have different moderating effects on the relationships between age and memory performance. Individuals with high levels of participation in novel and productive activities over the life course are less likely to clinically demonstrate cognitive impairments. Our results support the potential benefit of the three-dimensional model to provide a better insight into the complex role of intellectual activities in cognitive reserve, particularly for older adults. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and the benefits of the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01926-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A common belief among people and some researchers is that keeping yourself mentally active may decrease the risk of dementia. Over the past years, despite widespread efforts to identify proxies for protecting cognitive reserve against age-related changes, it is still not clear what type of intellectual activity would be beneficial for cognitive reserve. To fill this gap, we propose a three-dimensional model of intellectual activity. According to this conceptual model, intellectual activities could be distinguished based on their locations in a three-dimensions space, including; (1) Activation: active vs. passive, (2) Novelty: novel vs. familiar, and (3) Productivity: productive vs. receptive. We assumed that the activities that are categorized as more active, novel, and productive could be considered as a cognitive reserve proxy.

Methods: To test this hypothesis, a sample of 237 participants older than 50 years (Mage = 58.76 ± 6.66; 63.7% women) was recruited to take part in the study. Episodic, semantic and working memory were assessed with computerized battery tests (Sepidar) and a self-report questionnaire was used to assess intellectual activities. Activities were categorized in terms of; (1) passive, familiar, and receptive activities (radio/watching TV), (2) active, familiar, and receptive activities (solving crosswords), (3) active, novel, and receptive activities (reading), and (4) active, novel, and productive activities (writing).

Results: The results indicated that writing moderates the effect of age on episodic and semantic memory. Reading only moderates the effect of age on semantic memory, and radio/watching TV and solving crosswords do not play a role in moderation analysis.

Conclusions: Our finding suggests that intellectual activities have different moderating effects on the relationships between age and memory performance. Individuals with high levels of participation in novel and productive activities over the life course are less likely to clinically demonstrate cognitive impairments. Our results support the potential benefit of the three-dimensional model to provide a better insight into the complex role of intellectual activities in cognitive reserve, particularly for older adults. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and the benefits of the model.

Abstract Image

哪些智力活动与认知储备有关?引入并测试三维模型
背景:人们和一些研究人员普遍认为,保持脑力活动可以降低患痴呆症的风险。在过去几年中,尽管人们广泛努力寻找保护认知储备免受年龄相关变化影响的替代物,但仍不清楚哪种类型的智力活动对认知储备有益。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了智力活动的三维模型。根据这一概念模型,智力活动可根据其在三维空间中的位置加以区分,包括:(1)激活:主动与被动,(2)新奇:新奇与熟悉,以及(3)生产性:生产性与接受性。我们假设,被归类为更活跃、更新颖和更有成效的活动可被视为认知储备的代表:为了验证这一假设,我们招募了 237 名 50 岁以上的参与者(年龄 = 58.76 ± 6.66;女性占 63.7%)参与研究。研究人员使用计算机化电池测试(Sepidar)对表观记忆、语义记忆和工作记忆进行了评估,并使用自我报告问卷对智力活动进行了评估。活动分为:(1) 被动、熟悉和接受性活动(收音机/看电视),(2) 主动、熟悉和接受性活动(填字游戏),(3) 主动、新颖和接受性活动(阅读),(4) 主动、新颖和生产性活动(写作):结果表明,写作可以调节年龄对情节记忆和语义记忆的影响。阅读只能调节年龄对语义记忆的影响,而收音机/看电视和填字游戏在调节分析中不起作用:我们的研究结果表明,智力活动对年龄和记忆表现之间的关系具有不同的调节作用。在整个生命过程中,大量参与新颖和富有成效的活动的人较少在临床上表现出认知障碍。我们的研究结果支持了三维模型的潜在益处,它能让我们更好地了解智力活动在认知储备中的复杂作用,尤其是对老年人而言。要评估该模型的功效和益处,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信