Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Scotland: Results of a Survey of Cognitive Specialists.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Somying Tsai, Shuning Ma, Thomas Rune Nielsen, Clara Calia
{"title":"Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Scotland: Results of a Survey of Cognitive Specialists.","authors":"Somying Tsai, Shuning Ma, Thomas Rune Nielsen, Clara Calia","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minority ethnic groups (MEGs) in Europe receive suboptimal dementia evaluation, yet related research in Scotland is lacking. This research examined the evaluation of dementia in MEGs in Scotland and compared it with previous research to highlight the changes in the clinical evaluation of dementia over the decade.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A self-administered survey was created online and emailed to 14 Heads of the boards under the Scottish National Health Service and dementia-associated settings and organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most surveyed centers (85.6%) received MEG referrals. Although 92.9% of the centers used professional translators when needed, 85.7% thought assessing dementia in MEGs was difficult, mostly due to the suitability of test instruments and rating scales and patients' linguistic abilities. Very few found their skills to be good in evaluating MEGs. There was no mention of specialized dementia services for MEGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of culturally appropriate instruments and specialized dementia services reveals that the services are not ready to meet the demand for evaluating patients from diverse cultural and language backgrounds. Inadequate clinical evaluation may lead to misdiagnoses. Therefore, although significant work has been carried out in the past few years, improvements must be continued to enhance the current practices and apply suitable evaluation methods for MEGs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000608","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Minority ethnic groups (MEGs) in Europe receive suboptimal dementia evaluation, yet related research in Scotland is lacking. This research examined the evaluation of dementia in MEGs in Scotland and compared it with previous research to highlight the changes in the clinical evaluation of dementia over the decade.

Design and setting: A self-administered survey was created online and emailed to 14 Heads of the boards under the Scottish National Health Service and dementia-associated settings and organizations.

Results: Most surveyed centers (85.6%) received MEG referrals. Although 92.9% of the centers used professional translators when needed, 85.7% thought assessing dementia in MEGs was difficult, mostly due to the suitability of test instruments and rating scales and patients' linguistic abilities. Very few found their skills to be good in evaluating MEGs. There was no mention of specialized dementia services for MEGs.

Conclusions: The lack of culturally appropriate instruments and specialized dementia services reveals that the services are not ready to meet the demand for evaluating patients from diverse cultural and language backgrounds. Inadequate clinical evaluation may lead to misdiagnoses. Therefore, although significant work has been carried out in the past few years, improvements must be continued to enhance the current practices and apply suitable evaluation methods for MEGs.

苏格兰少数民族群体痴呆症评估:认知专家调查结果。
目的:欧洲的少数族裔群体(MEGs)接受的痴呆症评估并不理想,但苏格兰却缺乏相关研究。本研究考察了苏格兰 MEG 的痴呆症评估情况,并与之前的研究进行了比较,以突出十年来痴呆症临床评估的变化:设计与环境:我们在网上制作了一份自填式调查问卷,并通过电子邮件发送给苏格兰国民健康服务局下属的14个委员会负责人以及与痴呆症相关的机构和组织:大多数接受调查的中心(85.6%)都收到了脑电图转介。虽然 92.9% 的中心在需要时使用了专业翻译人员,但 85.7% 的中心认为在 MEG 中评估痴呆症很困难,主要原因是测试工具和评分量表的适用性以及患者的语言能力。只有极少数人认为他们在评估 MEG 方面有很好的技能。没有人提到过针对 MEG 的专门痴呆症服务:结论:缺乏适合不同文化背景的工具和专门的痴呆症服务表明,这些服务还不能满足对来自不同文化和语言背景的患者进行评估的需求。不充分的临床评估可能会导致误诊。因此,尽管在过去几年中已经开展了大量工作,但仍需继续改进,以提高当前的实践水平,并为 MEG 应用合适的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信