Comparative analysis of volatile components of Panax ginseng flower by four extraction methods

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Xin-Hong SONG , Lu-Sheng HAN , Lan YU , Yang-Bin LAI , En-Peng WANG , Shu-Ying LIU
{"title":"Comparative analysis of volatile components of Panax ginseng flower by four extraction methods","authors":"Xin-Hong SONG ,&nbsp;Lu-Sheng HAN ,&nbsp;Lan YU ,&nbsp;Yang-Bin LAI ,&nbsp;En-Peng WANG ,&nbsp;Shu-Ying LIU","doi":"10.1016/j.cjac.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Panax ginseng flowers (PGF), a constituent of ginseng, possess medicinal value and are widely recognized as a functional food. Therefore, ensuring meticulous control of PGF quality has become increasingly significant. One effective method for assessing product quality is to analyze the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in PGF, which act as indicative markers. In this study, VOCs in PGF were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), employing four extraction methods: steam distillation (SD), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), and static headspace sampling (SHS). The results revealed 103 annotated components using the area normalization approach, highlighting the major differences among the four extraction methods. The main sesquiterpenoid components of PGF, 1,6,10-dodecatriene, 7,11-dimethyl-3-methylene-, and (<em>E</em>)- were the only common components. The SD, SFE, HS-SPME, and SHS methods identified 67, 20, 38, and 18 components, respectively. These components accounted for 89.67%, 61.84%, 82.6%, and 50.3%, respectively, of the total volatile oil effluent peak areas. Additionally, each method extracted 11, 9, 8, and 8 components, with proportions exceeding 1% in the PGF extracts. Terpenoids were identified as the main VOCs in PGF, with the SD method showing the highest sesquiterpene content. Both HS-SPME and SHS methods contained sesquiterpenoids, which accounted for 61.471% and 22.708% of the total relative amount, respectively. Furthermore, the extraction capacity of the HS-SPME method is approximately three times higher than that of the SHS method. The volatile oil extract of PGF consists of main components such as alkanes, esters, sesquiterpenes, and steroids, with compound contents exceeding 1%. Our findings provide a theoretical foundation for the rational development of PGF resources.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":277,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"52 2","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204024000112/pdfft?md5=29c10691e3ff2529370bec89d2624b9d&pid=1-s2.0-S1872204024000112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204024000112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Panax ginseng flowers (PGF), a constituent of ginseng, possess medicinal value and are widely recognized as a functional food. Therefore, ensuring meticulous control of PGF quality has become increasingly significant. One effective method for assessing product quality is to analyze the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in PGF, which act as indicative markers. In this study, VOCs in PGF were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), employing four extraction methods: steam distillation (SD), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), and static headspace sampling (SHS). The results revealed 103 annotated components using the area normalization approach, highlighting the major differences among the four extraction methods. The main sesquiterpenoid components of PGF, 1,6,10-dodecatriene, 7,11-dimethyl-3-methylene-, and (E)- were the only common components. The SD, SFE, HS-SPME, and SHS methods identified 67, 20, 38, and 18 components, respectively. These components accounted for 89.67%, 61.84%, 82.6%, and 50.3%, respectively, of the total volatile oil effluent peak areas. Additionally, each method extracted 11, 9, 8, and 8 components, with proportions exceeding 1% in the PGF extracts. Terpenoids were identified as the main VOCs in PGF, with the SD method showing the highest sesquiterpene content. Both HS-SPME and SHS methods contained sesquiterpenoids, which accounted for 61.471% and 22.708% of the total relative amount, respectively. Furthermore, the extraction capacity of the HS-SPME method is approximately three times higher than that of the SHS method. The volatile oil extract of PGF consists of main components such as alkanes, esters, sesquiterpenes, and steroids, with compound contents exceeding 1%. Our findings provide a theoretical foundation for the rational development of PGF resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用四种提取方法比较分析三七花的挥发性成分
人参花(PGF)是人参的一种成分,具有药用价值,是公认的功能性食品。因此,确保对人参花质量的严格控制变得越来越重要。评估产品质量的一个有效方法是分析人参花中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs),这些化合物可作为指示性标记。本研究使用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)分析了 PGF 中的挥发性有机化合物,采用了四种萃取方法:蒸汽蒸馏法(SD)、超临界流体萃取法(SFE)、顶空固相微萃取法(HS-SPME)和静态顶空取样法(SHS)。采用面积归一化方法,结果显示了 103 种注释成分,突出显示了四种萃取方法之间的主要差异。PGF 的主要倍半萜成分、1,6,10-十二碳三烯、7,11-二甲基-3-亚甲基和 (E)- 是唯一的共同成分。SD、SFE、HS-SPME 和 SHS 方法分别鉴定出 67、20、38 和 18 种成分。这些成分分别占总挥发性油类流出物峰面积的 89.67%、61.84%、82.6% 和 50.3%。此外,每种方法分别提取了 11、9、8 和 8 种成分,在 PGF 提取物中的比例均超过 1%。经鉴定,萜类化合物是 PGF 中的主要挥发性有机化合物,其中 SD 方法的倍半萜含量最高。HS-SPME 和 SHS 方法均含有倍半萜类化合物,分别占相对总量的 61.471% 和 22.708%。此外,HS-SPME 法的萃取能力约为 SHS 法的三倍。PGF的挥发油提取物主要由烷烃、酯类、倍半萜和甾体等成分组成,化合物含量均超过1%。我们的研究结果为合理开发 PGF 资源提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17223
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(CJAC) is an academic journal of analytical chemistry established in 1972 and sponsored by the Chinese Chemical Society and Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its objectives are to report the original scientific research achievements and review the recent development of analytical chemistry in all areas. The journal sets up 5 columns including Research Papers, Research Notes, Experimental Technique and Instrument, Review and Progress and Summary Accounts. The journal published monthly in Chinese language. A detailed abstract, keywords and the titles of figures and tables are provided in English, except column of Summary Accounts. Prof. Wang Erkang, an outstanding analytical chemist, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Third World Academy of Sciences, holds the post of the Editor-in-chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信