Feasibility of Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in an Under-screened Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients With a Premastectomy Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jinnie Pang , Zhiyan Yan , Qing Ting Tan , John C. Allen , Mingjia Wang , Geok Hoon Lim
{"title":"Feasibility of Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in an Under-screened Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients With a Premastectomy Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ","authors":"Jinnie Pang ,&nbsp;Zhiyan Yan ,&nbsp;Qing Ting Tan ,&nbsp;John C. Allen ,&nbsp;Mingjia Wang ,&nbsp;Geok Hoon Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nodal involvement in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is rare. In patients with DCIS diagnosis prior to mastectomy, a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is usually performed during mastectomy, to avoid the risk of reoperation and the non-identification of SLN subsequently, should there be an upgrade to invasive cancer. We aimed to study the feasibility of omitting SLNB in an under-screened cohort, with mostly symptomatic patients and DCIS diagnosis before mastectomy, by determining the upgrade rate to invasive cancer/ DCIS microinvasion (DCISM) and its associated risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with pure DCIS diagnosis premastectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with known DCISM or invasive cancer before mastectomy and bilateral cancers were excluded. Patients’ demographics, radiological and pathological data premastectomy were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 189 patients were included. The mean age was 53.8 (range: 29-85) years old. About 64.4% presented with symptoms. 36.0% and 15.3% upgraded to invasive cancer and DCISM on mastectomy respectively. Palpable tumor (<em>P</em> = .0036), large size on ultrasound (<em>P</em> = .0283), tumor seen on mammogram and ultrasound (<em>P</em> = .0082), ultrasound-guided biopsy (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), high-grade DCIS on biopsy (<em>P</em> = .0350) and no open biopsy/lumpectomy before mastectomy (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) were associated with the upgrade, with the latter factor remaining significant after multivariable analysis. Nodal involvement was 8.47% and was associated with invasive cancer (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a cohort who had DCIS diagnosis before mastectomy and were mostly symptomatic, the upgrade rate was 51.3%. Despite the high upgrade rate, nodal involvement remained comparable. Risk factors could select patients for omission of upfront SLNB, with a delayed SLNB planned if needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nodal involvement in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is rare. In patients with DCIS diagnosis prior to mastectomy, a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is usually performed during mastectomy, to avoid the risk of reoperation and the non-identification of SLN subsequently, should there be an upgrade to invasive cancer. We aimed to study the feasibility of omitting SLNB in an under-screened cohort, with mostly symptomatic patients and DCIS diagnosis before mastectomy, by determining the upgrade rate to invasive cancer/ DCIS microinvasion (DCISM) and its associated risk factors.

Methods

Patients with pure DCIS diagnosis premastectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with known DCISM or invasive cancer before mastectomy and bilateral cancers were excluded. Patients’ demographics, radiological and pathological data premastectomy were analyzed.

Results

A total of 189 patients were included. The mean age was 53.8 (range: 29-85) years old. About 64.4% presented with symptoms. 36.0% and 15.3% upgraded to invasive cancer and DCISM on mastectomy respectively. Palpable tumor (P = .0036), large size on ultrasound (P = .0283), tumor seen on mammogram and ultrasound (P = .0082), ultrasound-guided biopsy (P < .0001), high-grade DCIS on biopsy (P = .0350) and no open biopsy/lumpectomy before mastectomy (P < .0001) were associated with the upgrade, with the latter factor remaining significant after multivariable analysis. Nodal involvement was 8.47% and was associated with invasive cancer (P < .0001).

Conclusion

In a cohort who had DCIS diagnosis before mastectomy and were mostly symptomatic, the upgrade rate was 51.3%. Despite the high upgrade rate, nodal involvement remained comparable. Risk factors could select patients for omission of upfront SLNB, with a delayed SLNB planned if needed.

在乳腺切除术前诊断为乳腺导管原位癌的筛查不足的乳腺癌患者群体中省略前哨淋巴结活检的可行性
背景导管原位癌(DCIS)的结节受累非常罕见。对于在乳房切除术前确诊为 DCIS 的患者,通常会在乳房切除术中进行前哨淋巴结活检 (SLNB),以避免再次手术的风险,以及在随后升级为浸润性癌症时无法识别 SLN。我们的目的是研究在筛查不足的队列中省略 SLNB 的可行性,这些队列中大多数是无症状患者,且在乳房切除术前已确诊为 DCIS,我们将确定升级为浸润癌/DCIS 微浸润(DCISM)的比率及其相关风险因素。方法对乳房切除术前确诊为纯DCIS的患者进行回顾性研究,排除了乳房切除术前已知有DCISM或浸润性癌症的患者以及双侧癌症患者。结果 共纳入 189 例患者。平均年龄为 53.8 岁(29-85 岁)。64.4%的患者有症状。分别有 36.0% 和 15.3% 的患者在乳房切除术后升级为浸润癌和 DCISM。可触及的肿瘤(p=0.0036)、超声检查发现的大尺寸肿瘤(p=0.0283)、乳房 X 线照片和超声检查发现的肿瘤(p=0.0082)、超声引导下活检(p<0.0001)、活检发现的高分级 DCIS(p=0.0350)以及乳房切除术前未进行开放性活检/肿块切除术(p<0.0001)与肿瘤升级有关,后一因素在多变量分析后仍具有显著性。结节受累率为 8.47%,与浸润性癌症相关(p<0.0001)。尽管升级率很高,但结节受累情况仍然相当。微观摘要在这项单中心回顾性队列研究(n=189)中,我们探讨了在乳腺切除术前确诊为乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的患者中省略前哨节点活检的可行性。在我们的队列中,升级为微小浸润癌和浸润癌的比例为 51.3%。尽管升级率很高,但结节受累率仍然很低,仅为 8.47%。升级的风险因素可用于选择是否省略前期 SLNB 的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信