Bingbing Zhao, Yufan Deng, Liang Luo, Min Deng, Xuexi Yang
{"title":"Preferred streets: assessing the impact of the street environment on cycling behaviors using the geographically weighted regression","authors":"Bingbing Zhao, Yufan Deng, Liang Luo, Min Deng, Xuexi Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10463-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cycling transport systems are an important way to reduce the city’s carbon emissions. Street renovation and renewal policies aim to encourage cycling transport by improving the cycling environment. However, most existing research studies the relationship between the street environment and cycling behavior from a global perspective, ignoring geospatial heterogeneity. Also, methods evaluating the cycling environment based on the frequency of cycling ignore the difference between spontaneous and necessary trips, hiding the problems that exist in streets with a high frequency of cycling. Therefore, the preferred streets index was proposed to evaluate the street cycling environment based on the difference between the cycling trajectory and the shortest path. Geographically weighted regression was used to explore the local effects of street environments on cycling behavior. The experimental results on Xiamen Island show that the type of street and the density of bicycle parking spots have a positive impact on cycling, while the effect of the availability of streetlights, availability of traffic lights, and POI density on cycling was determined by the geographic context of the street. These results provide concrete guidance for improving the cycling environment and enrich the evaluation methods for the cycling environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10463-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cycling transport systems are an important way to reduce the city’s carbon emissions. Street renovation and renewal policies aim to encourage cycling transport by improving the cycling environment. However, most existing research studies the relationship between the street environment and cycling behavior from a global perspective, ignoring geospatial heterogeneity. Also, methods evaluating the cycling environment based on the frequency of cycling ignore the difference between spontaneous and necessary trips, hiding the problems that exist in streets with a high frequency of cycling. Therefore, the preferred streets index was proposed to evaluate the street cycling environment based on the difference between the cycling trajectory and the shortest path. Geographically weighted regression was used to explore the local effects of street environments on cycling behavior. The experimental results on Xiamen Island show that the type of street and the density of bicycle parking spots have a positive impact on cycling, while the effect of the availability of streetlights, availability of traffic lights, and POI density on cycling was determined by the geographic context of the street. These results provide concrete guidance for improving the cycling environment and enrich the evaluation methods for the cycling environment.
自行车交通系统是减少城市碳排放的重要途径。街道改造和更新政策旨在通过改善骑行环境来鼓励骑行交通。然而,现有研究大多从全球角度研究街道环境与骑行行为之间的关系,忽略了地理空间的异质性。此外,基于骑行频率评估骑行环境的方法忽视了自发出行和必要出行之间的差异,从而掩盖了骑行频率高的街道存在的问题。因此,我们提出了首选街道指数,根据骑行轨迹与最短路径之间的差异来评估街道的骑行环境。地理加权回归被用来探索街道环境对骑行行为的局部影响。厦门岛的实验结果表明,街道类型和自行车停车点密度对骑行有积极影响,而路灯的可用性、交通灯的可用性和 POI 密度对骑行的影响则由街道的地理环境决定。这些结果为改善骑行环境提供了具体指导,也丰富了骑行环境的评价方法。
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.