{"title":"Pitfalls and mass-forming mimics of pancreatic cancer","authors":"Yoh Zen","doi":"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The diagnostic pathway of pancreatic lesions has changed since endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies were introduced. The tissue diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) used to be made by </span>cytology<span><span><span> or surgical specimens, while pancreatic biopsies currently contribute to a pretreatment diagnosis in >80 % of cases. </span>Pathologists need to assess subtle changes in biopsy specimens, in order to avoid over- and under-diagnosis of PDAC. The lack of stromal reaction does not exclude the possibility of PDAC, while abnormal distribution of the ducts and a mild but sufficient degree of </span>nuclear atypia<span> are diagnostic clues for well differentiated PDAC. It is also important to be aware of distinct types of pancreatitis<span><span> that potentially presents with a tumour. IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (type 1 AIP) is widely recognised as a mimic of PDAC. Other forms of mass-forming pancreatitis include type 2 AIP (IgG4-unrelated), follicular pancreatitis, groove pancreatitis and acute interstitial pancreatitis. Most of those conditions lack serological </span>diagnostic markers; therefore, the histology plays a central role in the diagnosis.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39961,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Histopathology","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 227-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231724000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The diagnostic pathway of pancreatic lesions has changed since endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies were introduced. The tissue diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) used to be made by cytology or surgical specimens, while pancreatic biopsies currently contribute to a pretreatment diagnosis in >80 % of cases. Pathologists need to assess subtle changes in biopsy specimens, in order to avoid over- and under-diagnosis of PDAC. The lack of stromal reaction does not exclude the possibility of PDAC, while abnormal distribution of the ducts and a mild but sufficient degree of nuclear atypia are diagnostic clues for well differentiated PDAC. It is also important to be aware of distinct types of pancreatitis that potentially presents with a tumour. IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (type 1 AIP) is widely recognised as a mimic of PDAC. Other forms of mass-forming pancreatitis include type 2 AIP (IgG4-unrelated), follicular pancreatitis, groove pancreatitis and acute interstitial pancreatitis. Most of those conditions lack serological diagnostic markers; therefore, the histology plays a central role in the diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
This monthly review journal aims to provide the practising diagnostic pathologist and trainee pathologist with up-to-date reviews on histopathology and cytology and related technical advances. Each issue contains invited articles on a variety of topics from experts in the field and includes a mini-symposium exploring one subject in greater depth. Articles consist of system-based, disease-based reviews and advances in technology. They update the readers on day-to-day diagnostic work and keep them informed of important new developments. An additional feature is the short section devoted to hypotheses; these have been refereed. There is also a correspondence section.