Etiological Profile of Epistaxis: Pre-Pandemic Versus Pandemic.

Current health sciences journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-30 DOI:10.12865/CHSJ.49.03.08
Andreea Nicoleta Vlaescu, Elena Ionita, Florin Anghelina, Carmen Aurelia Mogoanta, Sorin-Mircea Ciolofan, Andreea Rusescu, Irina-Gabriela Ionita, Catalina Voiosu, Razvan Hainarosie
{"title":"Etiological Profile of Epistaxis: Pre-Pandemic Versus Pandemic.","authors":"Andreea Nicoleta Vlaescu, Elena Ionita, Florin Anghelina, Carmen Aurelia Mogoanta, Sorin-Mircea Ciolofan, Andreea Rusescu, Irina-Gabriela Ionita, Catalina Voiosu, Razvan Hainarosie","doi":"10.12865/CHSJ.49.03.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nosebleed or epistaxis is one of the most common forms of presenting an emergency in the ENT field. Since March 11, 2020, the World Health Organisation has proclaimed COVID-19 a global pandemic, and the world has been closed down. The main objective of the study is to analyse and compare the dynamics of epistaxis aetiology among the cases that required hospitalisation in the pre-pandemic period and the period of the COVID 19 pandemic. The study is multicenter retrospective from October 2018 to May 2022, including 380 cases of hospitalised epistaxis, with the mention that March 2020 is considered the beginning of the pandemic period. 60.8% of the patients enrolled in the study in the pre-pandemic period (60.8%) and 39.2% in the pandemic period. Differences between groups were not statistically significant between study entries (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic) and age (p=0.331), gender (p=0.916) or existence of local causes for epistaxis (p=0.895). Patients with general causes for epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pandemic period, while patients without general causes for epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period. Patients with a hospitalisation period of more than 5 days were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period while patients with a hospitalisation period of 3 to 5 days were more frequently enrolled in the pandemic period. Also, patients with idiopathic epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period. Based on the results presented in our study, the period of the Covid 19 pandemic directly influenced both the number of patients and the period of hospitalisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93963,"journal":{"name":"Current health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12865/CHSJ.49.03.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nosebleed or epistaxis is one of the most common forms of presenting an emergency in the ENT field. Since March 11, 2020, the World Health Organisation has proclaimed COVID-19 a global pandemic, and the world has been closed down. The main objective of the study is to analyse and compare the dynamics of epistaxis aetiology among the cases that required hospitalisation in the pre-pandemic period and the period of the COVID 19 pandemic. The study is multicenter retrospective from October 2018 to May 2022, including 380 cases of hospitalised epistaxis, with the mention that March 2020 is considered the beginning of the pandemic period. 60.8% of the patients enrolled in the study in the pre-pandemic period (60.8%) and 39.2% in the pandemic period. Differences between groups were not statistically significant between study entries (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic) and age (p=0.331), gender (p=0.916) or existence of local causes for epistaxis (p=0.895). Patients with general causes for epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pandemic period, while patients without general causes for epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period. Patients with a hospitalisation period of more than 5 days were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period while patients with a hospitalisation period of 3 to 5 days were more frequently enrolled in the pandemic period. Also, patients with idiopathic epistaxis were more frequently enrolled in the pre-pandemic period. Based on the results presented in our study, the period of the Covid 19 pandemic directly influenced both the number of patients and the period of hospitalisation.

鼻衄的病因概况:大流行前与大流行。
鼻出血或鼻衄是耳鼻喉科领域最常见的急症之一。自 2020 年 3 月 11 日起,世界卫生组织已宣布 COVID-19 为全球大流行病,全球已进入关闭状态。本研究的主要目的是分析和比较疫情发生前和 COVID 19 大流行期间需要住院治疗的鼻衄病例的病因动态。该研究为多中心回顾性研究,时间为 2018 年 10 月至 2022 年 5 月,包括 380 例住院鼻衄病例,其中提及 2020 年 3 月被视为大流行时期的开始。60.8%的患者在大流行前(60.8%)和39.2%的患者在大流行期间加入研究。各组之间的差异在统计学上并不显著,研究条目(大流行前与大流行)与年龄(P=0.331)、性别(P=0.916)或是否存在鼻衄的局部原因(P=0.895)之间的差异也不显著。有一般原因引起鼻衄的患者在大流行期间入院的较多,而无一般原因引起鼻衄的患者在大流行前入院的较多。住院时间超过 5 天的患者在大流行前更常入院,而住院时间为 3 至 5 天的患者在大流行期间更常入院。此外,特发性鼻衄患者在大流行前期入院的人数较多。根据我们的研究结果,Covid 19 大流行的时期直接影响了患者人数和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信