Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection after traumatic injury in joint revision patients.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hao Li, Qingyuan Zheng, Erlong Niu, Jiazheng Xu, Wei Chai, Chi Xu, Jun Fu, Libo Hao, Jiying Chen, Guoqiang Zhang
{"title":"Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection after traumatic injury in joint revision patients.","authors":"Hao Li, Qingyuan Zheng, Erlong Niu, Jiazheng Xu, Wei Chai, Chi Xu, Jun Fu, Libo Hao, Jiying Chen, Guoqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00235-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although some risk factors of PJI were well studied, the association between trauma and PJI remains unknown in revision patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 71 patients with trauma history before revisions (trauma cohort) were propensity score matched (PSM) at a ratio of 1 to 5 with a control cohort of revision patients without a history of trauma. Then, the cumulative incidence rate of PJI within 3 years after operation between the two groups was compared. The secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions within 3 postoperative years, complications up to 30 postoperative days, and readmission up to 90 days. During a minimal 3-year follow-up, the survival was comparatively analyzed between the trauma cohort and the control cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of PJI was 40.85% in patients with trauma history against 27.04% in the controls (P = 0.02). Correspondingly, the cumulative incidence of aseptic re-revisions was 12.68% in patients with trauma history compared with 5.07% in the control cohort (P = 0.028). Cox regression revealed that trauma history was a risk factor of PJI (HR, 1.533 [95%CI, (1.019,2.306)]; P = 0.04) and aseptic re-revisions (HR, 3.285 [95%CI, (1.790,6.028)]; P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that revision patients with trauma history carried a higher risk of PJI compared to those without trauma history. Moreover, after revisions, the trauma patients were still at higher risk for treatment failure due to PJI, periprosthetic joint fracture, and mechanical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10840204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00235-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although some risk factors of PJI were well studied, the association between trauma and PJI remains unknown in revision patients.

Materials and methods: Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 71 patients with trauma history before revisions (trauma cohort) were propensity score matched (PSM) at a ratio of 1 to 5 with a control cohort of revision patients without a history of trauma. Then, the cumulative incidence rate of PJI within 3 years after operation between the two groups was compared. The secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions within 3 postoperative years, complications up to 30 postoperative days, and readmission up to 90 days. During a minimal 3-year follow-up, the survival was comparatively analyzed between the trauma cohort and the control cohort.

Results: The cumulative incidence of PJI was 40.85% in patients with trauma history against 27.04% in the controls (P = 0.02). Correspondingly, the cumulative incidence of aseptic re-revisions was 12.68% in patients with trauma history compared with 5.07% in the control cohort (P = 0.028). Cox regression revealed that trauma history was a risk factor of PJI (HR, 1.533 [95%CI, (1.019,2.306)]; P = 0.04) and aseptic re-revisions (HR, 3.285 [95%CI, (1.790,6.028)]; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that revision patients with trauma history carried a higher risk of PJI compared to those without trauma history. Moreover, after revisions, the trauma patients were still at higher risk for treatment failure due to PJI, periprosthetic joint fracture, and mechanical complications.

关节翻修患者在外伤后发生假体周围感染的风险增加。
背景:人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全关节成形术(TJA)后的一种严重并发症。尽管对 PJI 的一些风险因素进行了深入研究,但翻修患者的创伤与 PJI 之间的关联仍不清楚:2015年至2018年期间,将71例翻修前有外伤史的患者(外伤队列)与无外伤史的翻修患者对照队列按1比5的比例进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。然后比较两组患者术后 3 年内 PJI 的累积发生率。次要终点是术后3年内的无菌翻修、术后30天内的并发症和90天内的再入院。在最短的3年随访期间,对创伤组和对照组的存活率进行了比较分析:结果:有外伤史的患者 PJI 累计发生率为 40.85%,而对照组为 27.04%(P = 0.02)。相应地,有外伤史的患者无菌性再翻修的累计发生率为 12.68%,而对照组为 5.07%(P = 0.028)。Cox 回归显示,外伤史是 PJI(HR,1.533 [95%CI,(1.019,2.306)];P = 0.04)和无菌再翻修(HR,3.285 [95%CI,(1.790,6.028)];P 结论:我们的研究表明,与无外伤史的翻修患者相比,有外伤史的翻修患者发生 PJI 的风险更高。此外,翻修后,外伤患者因PJI、假体周围关节骨折和机械并发症导致治疗失败的风险仍然较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信