Treatment Options for Tennis Elbow - An Umbrella Review.

Q3 Medicine
Michał Bonczar, Patryk Ostrowski, Dawid Plutecki, Martyna Dziedzic, Jakub FLorek, Weronika Michalik, Wojciech Przybycień, Paweł Depukat, Bartosz Rutowicz, Ewa Walocha, Mateusz Koziej
{"title":"Treatment Options for Tennis Elbow - An Umbrella Review.","authors":"Michał Bonczar, Patryk Ostrowski, Dawid Plutecki, Martyna Dziedzic, Jakub FLorek, Weronika Michalik, Wojciech Przybycień, Paweł Depukat, Bartosz Rutowicz, Ewa Walocha, Mateusz Koziej","doi":"10.24425/fmc.2023.147213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main goal of the present umbrella review was to provide the most up-to- date and evidence-based results regarding the various treatment options for tennis elbow (TE), which hopefully will significantly decrease the confusions existing in the literature. Furthermore, our study differs from past analytical studies because, as to the best of the authors' knowledge, is the first to provide independent (not in comparison to other treatment) statistical results regarding the effectiveness of each TE treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Major medical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, BIOSIS, and EBSCO were searched. The overall search process was conducted in 3 stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Out of those 40 meta-analyses, a total of 160 primary studies were screened in order to extract the data and perform a statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present umbrella review underlines the efficiency of injection therapies, especially autologous blood, and platelet-rich plasma, while simultaneously proving the ineffectiveness of acupuncture and shock wave therapy as treatments for TE. Furthermore, the value of other known conservative treatment modalities, such as physical therapy, has been demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12106,"journal":{"name":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","volume":"63 3","pages":"31-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2023.147213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The main goal of the present umbrella review was to provide the most up-to- date and evidence-based results regarding the various treatment options for tennis elbow (TE), which hopefully will significantly decrease the confusions existing in the literature. Furthermore, our study differs from past analytical studies because, as to the best of the authors' knowledge, is the first to provide independent (not in comparison to other treatment) statistical results regarding the effectiveness of each TE treatment.

Materials and methods: Major medical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, BIOSIS, and EBSCO were searched. The overall search process was conducted in 3 stages.

Results: A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Out of those 40 meta-analyses, a total of 160 primary studies were screened in order to extract the data and perform a statistical analysis.

Conclusion: The present umbrella review underlines the efficiency of injection therapies, especially autologous blood, and platelet-rich plasma, while simultaneously proving the ineffectiveness of acupuncture and shock wave therapy as treatments for TE. Furthermore, the value of other known conservative treatment modalities, such as physical therapy, has been demonstrated.

网球肘的治疗方案 - 综述。
导言:本综述的主要目的是提供有关网球肘(TE)各种治疗方案的最新循证结果,希望能大大减少文献中存在的混乱现象。此外,我们的研究有别于以往的分析研究,因为就作者所知,我们的研究是第一项提供有关每种网球肘治疗方法有效性的独立(非与其他治疗方法比较)统计结果的研究:检索了主要的医学数据库,如 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、Google Scholar、Cochrane Library、BIOSIS 和 EBSCO。整个检索过程分三个阶段进行:结果:共有 40 项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入本研究。在这 40 项荟萃分析中,共筛选出 160 项主要研究,以便提取数据并进行统计分析:本综述强调了注射疗法(尤其是自体血和富含血小板的血浆)的有效性,同时也证明了针灸和冲击波疗法作为 TE 治疗方法的无效性。此外,其他已知的保守治疗方法(如物理疗法)的价值也得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia medica Cracoviensia
Folia medica Cracoviensia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信