Long-term efficacy of a continuity-of-care treatment model for patients with severe mental illness who transition from in-patient to out-patient services.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hagai Maoz, Rony Sabbag, Shlomo Mendlovic, Israel Krieger, Daphna Shefet, Ido Lurie
{"title":"Long-term efficacy of a continuity-of-care treatment model for patients with severe mental illness who transition from in-patient to out-patient services.","authors":"Hagai Maoz, Rony Sabbag, Shlomo Mendlovic, Israel Krieger, Daphna Shefet, Ido Lurie","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its significance, ensuring continuity of care demands substantial resources, which might not be readily accessible in many public healthcare systems. Studies indicate that continuity of care remains uncertain in numerous healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a continuity-of-care model for patients with severe mental illness (SMI), providing seamless treatment from discharge from a closed ward to subsequent psychiatric, psychological and rehabilitation services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from patients discharged before (1 January to 31 December 2018) and after (1 June 2021 to 31 May 2022) full implementation of the model were analysed and compared in terms of average duration of hospital stay, emergency department visits within 90 days of discharge, readmission rate within a year post-discharge and initiation of rehabilitation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the post-implementation period (<i>n</i> = 482), the average admission time significantly decreased from 30.51 ± 29.72 to 26.77 ± 27.89 days, compared with the pre-implementation period (<i>n</i> = 403) (<i>P</i> = 0.029). Emergency department visits within 90 days following discharge decreased from 38.70 to 26.35% of discharged patients (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The rate of readmission decreased from 50.9 to 44.0% (<i>P</i> = 0.041) for one readmission and from 28.3 to 22.0% (<i>P</i> = 0.032) for two readmissions in the year following discharge. Additionally, the proportion of patients entering formal rehabilitation increased from 7.94 to 12.03% (<i>P</i> = 0.044).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of a continuity-of-care model spearheaded by senior psychiatrists and involving paramedical personnel. These findings underscore the significant potential of the model to substantially enhance mental health services and outcomes. Moreover, they emphasise its relevance for patients, clinicians and policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10933559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite its significance, ensuring continuity of care demands substantial resources, which might not be readily accessible in many public healthcare systems. Studies indicate that continuity of care remains uncertain in numerous healthcare systems.

Aims: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a continuity-of-care model for patients with severe mental illness (SMI), providing seamless treatment from discharge from a closed ward to subsequent psychiatric, psychological and rehabilitation services.

Method: Data from patients discharged before (1 January to 31 December 2018) and after (1 June 2021 to 31 May 2022) full implementation of the model were analysed and compared in terms of average duration of hospital stay, emergency department visits within 90 days of discharge, readmission rate within a year post-discharge and initiation of rehabilitation process.

Results: In the post-implementation period (n = 482), the average admission time significantly decreased from 30.51 ± 29.72 to 26.77 ± 27.89 days, compared with the pre-implementation period (n = 403) (P = 0.029). Emergency department visits within 90 days following discharge decreased from 38.70 to 26.35% of discharged patients (P < 0.001). The rate of readmission decreased from 50.9 to 44.0% (P = 0.041) for one readmission and from 28.3 to 22.0% (P = 0.032) for two readmissions in the year following discharge. Additionally, the proportion of patients entering formal rehabilitation increased from 7.94 to 12.03% (P = 0.044).

Conclusions: This study highlights the effectiveness of a continuity-of-care model spearheaded by senior psychiatrists and involving paramedical personnel. These findings underscore the significant potential of the model to substantially enhance mental health services and outcomes. Moreover, they emphasise its relevance for patients, clinicians and policy makers.

针对从住院治疗转为门诊治疗的重症精神病患者的持续治疗模式的长期疗效。
背景:尽管连续性护理非常重要,但确保连续性护理需要大量资源,而这些资源在许多公共医疗系统中可能并不容易获得。研究表明,在许多医疗系统中,护理的连续性仍然不确定。目的:本研究旨在评估重症精神病患者连续性护理模式的有效性,该模式提供从封闭病房出院到后续精神、心理和康复服务的无缝治疗:对全面实施该模式之前(2018年1月1日至12月31日)和之后(2021年6月1日至2022年5月31日)的出院患者数据进行了分析,并从平均住院时间、出院后90天内的急诊就诊率、出院后一年内的再入院率以及康复流程的启动等方面进行了比较:与实施前(n = 403)相比,实施后(n = 482)的平均住院时间从 30.51 ± 29.72 天大幅减少到 26.77 ± 27.89 天(P = 0.029)。出院后 90 天内到急诊科就诊的患者比例从 38.70% 降至 26.35%(P < 0.001)。出院后一年内再入院一次的比例从 50.9% 降至 44.0%(P = 0.041),再入院两次的比例从 28.3% 降至 22.0%(P = 0.032)。此外,接受正规康复治疗的患者比例从 7.94% 增加到 12.03% (P = 0.044):本研究强调了由资深精神科医生牵头、医务辅助人员参与的持续护理模式的有效性。这些研究结果凸显了该模式在大幅提升精神健康服务和成果方面的巨大潜力。此外,它们还强调了该模式对患者、临床医生和政策制定者的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信