WhatsApp with the Evidence Base for Behavioral Parent Training Apps? A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone Applications

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Melyssa M. Mandelbaum, Allison M. A. Rumelt, Shira N. Wein, Hilary B. Vidair
{"title":"WhatsApp with the Evidence Base for Behavioral Parent Training Apps? A Systematic Review of Mobile Phone Applications","authors":"Melyssa M. Mandelbaum, Allison M. A. Rumelt, Shira N. Wein, Hilary B. Vidair","doi":"10.1007/s10826-024-02789-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavioral parent training (BPT) is a highly efficacious evidence-based treatment for children with externalizing behavior problems, yet parents often do not attend this treatment or discontinue prematurely. The recent proliferation of parenting apps is a promising alternative for helping parents address child behavior difficulties; however, there is scant research examining evidence-based support for these apps. The purpose of the current study was to examine if, and to what extent, parenting apps include core BPT techniques. Each of the six BPT techniques was broken down into components considered essential for teaching each strategy effectively. Seventy-three parenting apps met criteria for inclusion based on keyword searches for child behavior difficulties and parenting in app stores. Findings revealed little evidence-based support for parenting apps. Specifically, the mean number of BPT techniques was limited, with approximately 75% of apps including two or fewer of the six BPT techniques and none including all six techniques. Reinforcement was included most often (84% of apps), followed by punishment (64%). Direct commands had the highest mean percentage of components across BPT techniques yet was included in the fewest number of apps (4%). The results highlight the need for increased evidence-based BPT content for parenting apps. Recommendations include an app classification system and thorough examination of parenting apps before suggesting them to clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","volume":"302 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02789-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral parent training (BPT) is a highly efficacious evidence-based treatment for children with externalizing behavior problems, yet parents often do not attend this treatment or discontinue prematurely. The recent proliferation of parenting apps is a promising alternative for helping parents address child behavior difficulties; however, there is scant research examining evidence-based support for these apps. The purpose of the current study was to examine if, and to what extent, parenting apps include core BPT techniques. Each of the six BPT techniques was broken down into components considered essential for teaching each strategy effectively. Seventy-three parenting apps met criteria for inclusion based on keyword searches for child behavior difficulties and parenting in app stores. Findings revealed little evidence-based support for parenting apps. Specifically, the mean number of BPT techniques was limited, with approximately 75% of apps including two or fewer of the six BPT techniques and none including all six techniques. Reinforcement was included most often (84% of apps), followed by punishment (64%). Direct commands had the highest mean percentage of components across BPT techniques yet was included in the fewest number of apps (4%). The results highlight the need for increased evidence-based BPT content for parenting apps. Recommendations include an app classification system and thorough examination of parenting apps before suggesting them to clients.

Abstract Image

父母行为训练应用程序的证据基础是什么?对手机应用程序的系统回顾
行为家长培训(BPT)是一种针对有外化行为问题的儿童的高效循证治疗方法,但家长往往不参加这种治疗或过早中断治疗。最近出现的育儿应用程序是帮助家长解决儿童行为问题的一种很有前景的替代方法;然而,对这些应用程序的循证支持研究却很少。本研究的目的是考察育儿应用程序是否包含 BPT 核心技术,以及在多大程度上包含了这些技术。六种 BPT 技术中的每一种都被细分为有效教授每种策略所必需的组成部分。根据在应用程序商店中对儿童行为障碍和育儿的关键词搜索,有 73 款育儿应用程序符合纳入标准。研究结果显示,育儿应用程序几乎没有证据支持。具体而言,BPT 技术的平均数量有限,约 75% 的应用程序包含六种 BPT 技术中的两种或更少,没有一款应用程序包含所有六种技术。强化的应用最多(84% 的应用),其次是惩罚(64%)。在所有 BPT 技术中,直接命令的平均比例最高,但包含在应用程序中的比例却最低(4%)。研究结果凸显了在育儿应用程序中增加基于证据的 BPT 内容的必要性。建议包括建立应用程序分类系统,并在向客户推荐育儿应用程序之前对其进行彻底检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Family Studies (JCFS) international, peer-reviewed forum for topical issues pertaining to the behavioral health and well-being of children, adolescents, and their families. Interdisciplinary and ecological in approach, the journal focuses on individual, family, and community contexts that influence child, youth, and family well-being and translates research results into practical applications for providers, program implementers, and policymakers. Original papers address applied and translational research, program evaluation, service delivery, and policy matters that affect child, youth, and family well-being. Topic areas include but are not limited to: enhancing child, youth/young adult, parent, caregiver, and/or family functioning; prevention and intervention related to social, emotional, or behavioral functioning in children, youth, and families; cumulative effects of risk and protective factors on behavioral health, development, and well-being; the effects both of exposure to adverse childhood events and assets/protective factors; child abuse and neglect, housing instability and homelessness, and related ecological factors influencing child and family outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信