Decision-making in borderline hip dysplasia and concomitant femoracetabular impingement syndrome: using a discrete choice experiment to explore patient preferences

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Grant H Cabell, Nicholas F Kwon, Christopher Shultz, Carolyn A Hutyra, Brian D Lewis, Steven A Olson, Michael J Salata, Shane J Nho, Richard C Mather III
{"title":"Decision-making in borderline hip dysplasia and concomitant femoracetabular impingement syndrome: using a discrete choice experiment to explore patient preferences","authors":"Grant H Cabell, Nicholas F Kwon, Christopher Shultz, Carolyn A Hutyra, Brian D Lewis, Steven A Olson, Michael J Salata, Shane J Nho, Richard C Mather III","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-making regarding surgical treatment of patients showing radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) remains a challenge as there is no consensus on treatment in current literature. When medical evidence is unclear, understanding patient preferences becomes particularly important in deciding the optimal treatment for each patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the patient-determined importance of factors surrounding surgical treatment of FAIS in BHD. Patients aged 18–65 with hip pain and BHD (defined as lateral center edge angle 18–25 or Tonnis angle 10–15) morphology were given a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) focusing on attributes that differ between treatment options: Length of Hospital Stay, Major Complication Rate, Chance of Needing Reoperation within 2 Years and Time to Return to Regular Exercise. This DCE was used to calculate treatment preferences, relative attribute importance and preference weights. A total of 101 patients fully completed the DCE. The most important attribute (average importance weight, 95% CI) was Chance of Reoperation (60.16, 56.99–63.34), while the least important was Hospital Stay (6.57, 5.73–7.41). Only 6 Months to Resume Regular Exercise and 2% Chance of Reoperation (P < 0.05) significantly impacted treatment choice. When presented with fixed choice parameters, 50.5% of subjects preferred PAO and arthroscopy while 49.5% opted for arthroscopy alone. When no clear surgical treatment is indicated, patient preferences have an amplified role in patient decision-making. Our results confirm variation in attribute importance within treatments as well as treatment choice, highlighting the importance in understanding patient preferences in decision-making for FAIS in BHD. More patient-specific generalizable outcomes of surgical treatment options are needed in the literature.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"245 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision-making regarding surgical treatment of patients showing radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) remains a challenge as there is no consensus on treatment in current literature. When medical evidence is unclear, understanding patient preferences becomes particularly important in deciding the optimal treatment for each patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the patient-determined importance of factors surrounding surgical treatment of FAIS in BHD. Patients aged 18–65 with hip pain and BHD (defined as lateral center edge angle 18–25 or Tonnis angle 10–15) morphology were given a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) focusing on attributes that differ between treatment options: Length of Hospital Stay, Major Complication Rate, Chance of Needing Reoperation within 2 Years and Time to Return to Regular Exercise. This DCE was used to calculate treatment preferences, relative attribute importance and preference weights. A total of 101 patients fully completed the DCE. The most important attribute (average importance weight, 95% CI) was Chance of Reoperation (60.16, 56.99–63.34), while the least important was Hospital Stay (6.57, 5.73–7.41). Only 6 Months to Resume Regular Exercise and 2% Chance of Reoperation (P < 0.05) significantly impacted treatment choice. When presented with fixed choice parameters, 50.5% of subjects preferred PAO and arthroscopy while 49.5% opted for arthroscopy alone. When no clear surgical treatment is indicated, patient preferences have an amplified role in patient decision-making. Our results confirm variation in attribute importance within treatments as well as treatment choice, highlighting the importance in understanding patient preferences in decision-making for FAIS in BHD. More patient-specific generalizable outcomes of surgical treatment options are needed in the literature.
边缘性髋关节发育不良和并发股骨髋臼撞击综合征的决策:利用离散选择实验探索患者的偏好
在边缘性髋关节发育不良(BHD)的情况下,对有影像学证据显示患有股骨髋臼撞击综合征(FAIS)的患者进行手术治疗的决策仍是一项挑战,因为目前的文献中尚未就治疗方法达成共识。在医学证据不明确的情况下,了解患者的偏好对决定每位患者的最佳治疗方法尤为重要。本研究的目的是衡量患者对 BHD FAIS 手术治疗相关因素的重要程度。对年龄在 18-65 岁、患有髋关节疼痛和 BHD(定义为外侧中心边缘角度 18-25 或 Tonnis 角度 10-15)形态的患者进行了离散选择实验 (DCE),重点关注不同治疗方案的不同属性:住院时间、主要并发症发生率、两年内需要再次手术的几率以及恢复正常运动的时间。该 DCE 用于计算治疗偏好、相对属性重要性和偏好权重。共有 101 名患者完整填写了 DCE。最重要的属性(平均重要性权重,95% CI)是再次手术的机会(60.16,56.99-63.34),而最不重要的属性是住院时间(6.57,5.73-7.41)。只有 6 个月恢复正常运动和 2% 的再手术几率(P < 0.05)对治疗选择有显著影响。在有固定选择参数的情况下,50.5% 的受试者选择 PAO 和关节镜手术,49.5% 的受试者选择单纯关节镜手术。当没有明确的手术治疗指征时,患者的偏好在患者决策中的作用会被放大。我们的研究结果证实了治疗方法和治疗选择中属性重要性的差异,突出了在 BHD 的 FAIS 决策中了解患者偏好的重要性。文献中还需要更多针对特定患者的可推广的手术治疗方案结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信