Personality across diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in an online convenience sample

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104466

Eleanor J. Junkins, Kenzhane Pantin, Jaime Derringer

{"title":"Personality across diverse sexual orientations and gender identities in an online convenience sample","authors":"Eleanor J. Junkins, Kenzhane Pantin, Jaime Derringer","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Sexual and gender minority participants (SGM) are underrepresented in quantitative psychology research overlooking a growing portion of the population. Previous research reports differences in personality between few categorical designations of gender and sexual orientation. The current study sought to expand the gender similarities hypothesis and characterize the feasibility of recruiting an SGM-diverse sample online. In preregistered analyses of 1,259 participants (73% identifying as SGM), we found that data quality was high, personality differences between groups were small overall (|d|average = 0.16; |d|range = 0–0.66), and there was substantial variability between facet-level group differences (|d| ± 0.59). We discuss implications for the attainability of diverse samples, group comparisons, and representativeness.</div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 104466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X/pdfft?md5=ffcaf9db1275ad02382adbc884a59164&pid=1-s2.0-S009265662400014X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority participants (SGM) are underrepresented in quantitative psychology research overlooking a growing portion of the population. Previous research reports differences in personality between few categorical designations of gender and sexual orientation. The current study sought to expand the gender similarities hypothesis and characterize the feasibility of recruiting an SGM-diverse sample online. In preregistered analyses of 1,259 participants (73% identifying as SGM), we found that data quality was high, personality differences between groups were small overall (|d|_average = 0.16; |d|_range = 0–0.66), and there was substantial variability between facet-level group differences (|d| ± 0.59). We discuss implications for the attainability of diverse samples, group comparisons, and representativeness.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在线便利样本中不同性取向和性别认同的人格特征

在定量心理学研究中，性取向和性别少数群体参与者（SGM）的代表性不足，而这一人群的比例却在不断增长。以往的研究报告显示，性别和性取向这两个少数分类之间存在人格差异。目前的研究试图扩展性别相似性假设，并确定在线招募 SGM 多样性样本的可行性。在对 1259 名参与者（73% 识别为 SGM）进行的预先登记分析中，我们发现数据质量很高，组间人格差异总体较小（|d|平均 = 0.16；|d|范围 = 0-0.66），面级组间差异存在很大的变异性（|d| ± 0.59）。我们讨论了多样化样本的可获得性、群体比较和代表性的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Research in Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

6.10%

发文量

102

审稿时长

67 days

期刊介绍： Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.