Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xiaolong Cheng , Lawrence Jun Zhang
{"title":"Engaging secondary school students with peer feedback in L2 writing classrooms: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Xiaolong Cheng ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While recent decades have witnessed the proliferation of studies on peer feedback in L2 writing, little is known about how L2 learners engage affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively with this practice. To narrow this gap, the present study employing a mixed-methods approach examined L2 learners’ engagement with peer feedback in the Chinese secondary school context. Data were collected from a variety of sources over 12 weeks, including questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, writing journals, and learners’ first and revised writing samples. The results showed that the teacher’s scaffolding with systematic instruction comprising pre-feedback sessions, multiple feedback practices, and post-feedback reinforcement helped the participants engage with peer feedback proactively in affect, behavior, and cognition. Furthermore, the participants’ perception of their improvement in the three dimensions was also evident over the semester. Overall, this study demonstrates the role of teachers in student engagement and advances our understanding of L2 learner engagement with peer feedback. Additionally, it offers important pedagogical implications for fostering and promoting L2 learners’ engagement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000166/pdfft?md5=e64e0b8961cc036e7e523bfea8ee88a2&pid=1-s2.0-S0191491X24000166-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While recent decades have witnessed the proliferation of studies on peer feedback in L2 writing, little is known about how L2 learners engage affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively with this practice. To narrow this gap, the present study employing a mixed-methods approach examined L2 learners’ engagement with peer feedback in the Chinese secondary school context. Data were collected from a variety of sources over 12 weeks, including questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, writing journals, and learners’ first and revised writing samples. The results showed that the teacher’s scaffolding with systematic instruction comprising pre-feedback sessions, multiple feedback practices, and post-feedback reinforcement helped the participants engage with peer feedback proactively in affect, behavior, and cognition. Furthermore, the participants’ perception of their improvement in the three dimensions was also evident over the semester. Overall, this study demonstrates the role of teachers in student engagement and advances our understanding of L2 learner engagement with peer feedback. Additionally, it offers important pedagogical implications for fostering and promoting L2 learners’ engagement.

让中学生在第二语言写作课堂上参与同伴反馈:混合方法研究
近几十年来,有关第二语言写作中同伴反馈的研究层出不穷,但人们对第二语言学习者如何在情感、行为和认知上参与同伴反馈却知之甚少。为了缩小这一差距,本研究采用了一种混合方法,考察了中国中学背景下 L2 学习者参与同伴反馈的情况。在 12 周的时间里,研究人员通过各种渠道收集了数据,包括调查问卷、半结构式访谈、写作日记以及学习者的首次写作样本和修改后的写作样本。研究结果表明,教师通过系统化的教学支架,包括反馈前环节、多种反馈实践和反馈后强化,帮助学员在情感、行为和认知方面积极主动地参与同伴反馈。此外,学员们对自己在这三个维度上的进步也有明显的感知。总之,本研究证明了教师在学生参与中的作用,并加深了我们对后天学习者参与同伴反馈的理解。此外,它还为培养和促进 L2 学习者的参与提供了重要的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信