Comparative Study for Postoperative Initial Fixation Patterns of Two Different Types of Cementless Short Stem Using Three-Dimensional Templating Software.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.4055/cios23100
Takuya Nakai, Yu Takeda, Saori Niitsu, Yuki Fujihara, Shohei Okahisa, Toshiya Tachibana, Shigeo Fukunishi
{"title":"Comparative Study for Postoperative Initial Fixation Patterns of Two Different Types of Cementless Short Stem Using Three-Dimensional Templating Software.","authors":"Takuya Nakai, Yu Takeda, Saori Niitsu, Yuki Fujihara, Shohei Okahisa, Toshiya Tachibana, Shigeo Fukunishi","doi":"10.4055/cios23100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While cementless short stems have become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA), Metha is a relatively recent development that differs from other short stems in its initial fixation concept of partial collum-sparing metaphyseal anchorage. The purpose of this study was to quantify the contact state between Metha and the femur. Additionally, we investigated the difference in contact points between Meta and Fitmore, which is one of the more popular curved short stems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 42 hips that underwent THA using Metha and 41 hips using Fitmore. Stem-to-femur contact was evaluated by density mapping using a three-dimensional digital template system to quantify the contact condition according to the modified Gruen zone. The criterion for the stem-to-bone contact boundary was defined as a computed tomography value of 543 Hounsfield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative evaluation of Metha according to the modified Gruen zones showed the ratio of surface area with high cortical contact in each zone. The results were 4.6% ± 5.7% in zone 1, 0.9% ± 2.3% in zone 2, 19.1% ± 12.9% in zone 3, 1.4% ± 3.2% in zone 5, 29.6% ± 16.4% in zone 6, and 25.1% ± 17.7% in zones 7. Evaluation of Fitmore for the same zones was as follows: 1.6% ± 2.4%, 18.5% ± 16.9%, 20.8% ± 17.4%, 12.7% ± 12.8%, 3.7% ± 5.8%, and 13.3% ± 10.3%. Comparing the two groups, the contact area was significantly greater for Metha in zones 1, 6 and 7 and Fitmore in zones 2 and 5 (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is possible for Metha to achieve metaphyseal anchoring by contacting the cortical bone at the proximal femur, thus avoiding proximal offloading. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have quantitatively reported stem-to-cortical bone contact conditions in curved short stems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10825261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While cementless short stems have become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA), Metha is a relatively recent development that differs from other short stems in its initial fixation concept of partial collum-sparing metaphyseal anchorage. The purpose of this study was to quantify the contact state between Metha and the femur. Additionally, we investigated the difference in contact points between Meta and Fitmore, which is one of the more popular curved short stems.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 42 hips that underwent THA using Metha and 41 hips using Fitmore. Stem-to-femur contact was evaluated by density mapping using a three-dimensional digital template system to quantify the contact condition according to the modified Gruen zone. The criterion for the stem-to-bone contact boundary was defined as a computed tomography value of 543 Hounsfield.

Results: Quantitative evaluation of Metha according to the modified Gruen zones showed the ratio of surface area with high cortical contact in each zone. The results were 4.6% ± 5.7% in zone 1, 0.9% ± 2.3% in zone 2, 19.1% ± 12.9% in zone 3, 1.4% ± 3.2% in zone 5, 29.6% ± 16.4% in zone 6, and 25.1% ± 17.7% in zones 7. Evaluation of Fitmore for the same zones was as follows: 1.6% ± 2.4%, 18.5% ± 16.9%, 20.8% ± 17.4%, 12.7% ± 12.8%, 3.7% ± 5.8%, and 13.3% ± 10.3%. Comparing the two groups, the contact area was significantly greater for Metha in zones 1, 6 and 7 and Fitmore in zones 2 and 5 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: It is possible for Metha to achieve metaphyseal anchoring by contacting the cortical bone at the proximal femur, thus avoiding proximal offloading. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have quantitatively reported stem-to-cortical bone contact conditions in curved short stems.

使用三维模板软件对两种不同类型无骨水泥短茎的术后初始固定模式进行比较研究。
背景:虽然无骨水泥短茎已在全髋关节置换术(THA)中流行起来,但美莎(Metha)是最近才开发出来的,它与其他短茎的不同之处在于其最初的固定概念是部分骨骺锚定。本研究的目的是量化 Metha 与股骨之间的接触状态。此外,我们还研究了 Meta 与 Fitmore(一种更受欢迎的弧形短茎)之间接触点的差异:我们对42个使用Metha和41个使用Fitmore进行THA的髋关节进行了回顾性检查。通过使用三维数字模板系统绘制密度图,根据改良的格鲁恩区量化接触情况,评估茎突与骨的接触情况。茎-骨接触边界的标准定义为计算机断层扫描值为543 Hounsfield:根据改良格鲁恩区对 Metha 进行的定量评估显示了各区皮质高度接触表面积的比率。结果显示,1 区为 4.6% ± 5.7%,2 区为 0.9% ± 2.3%,3 区为 19.1% ± 12.9%,5 区为 1.4% ± 3.2%,6 区为 29.6% ± 16.4%,7 区为 25.1% ± 17.7%。同一区域的 Fitmore 评估结果如下:1.6% ± 2.4%、18.5% ± 16.9%、20.8% ± 17.4%、12.7% ± 12.8%、3.7% ± 5.8% 和 13.3% ± 10.3%。两组相比,Metha 在 1、6 和 7 区的接触面积明显更大,而 Fitmore 在 2 和 5 区的接触面积明显更大(P < 0.05):结论:Metha 可以通过接触股骨近端皮质骨来实现骺端锚定,从而避免近端脱位。据我们所知,以前没有研究定量报告过弯曲短茎柄与皮质骨接触的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信