A Step Toward the Development of the First National Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework to Support Healthcare Decision Making in Saudi Arabia

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ahmed Al-Jedai MBA , Hajer Almudaiheem PharmD , Yazeed Alruthia PhD , Abdullah Althemery PhD , Hana Alabdulkarim PharmD , Rita Ojeil MSc , Ali Alrumaih PharmD , Suliman AlGhannam MD , AbdulAali AlMutairi PhD , Zuhair Hasnan MD
{"title":"A Step Toward the Development of the First National Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework to Support Healthcare Decision Making in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Ahmed Al-Jedai MBA ,&nbsp;Hajer Almudaiheem PharmD ,&nbsp;Yazeed Alruthia PhD ,&nbsp;Abdullah Althemery PhD ,&nbsp;Hana Alabdulkarim PharmD ,&nbsp;Rita Ojeil MSc ,&nbsp;Ali Alrumaih PharmD ,&nbsp;Suliman AlGhannam MD ,&nbsp;AbdulAali AlMutairi PhD ,&nbsp;Zuhair Hasnan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of implementing multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and to select the criteria for preparing a national MCDA framework for health technology assessment of orphan drugs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase I, a targeted literature review was performed to gather relevant information on the implementation of MCDA in healthcare decision making. Phase II was a cross-sectional survey, conducted to obtain insights from different stakeholders and key opinion leaders on specific topics from the KSA perspective. Phase III included a round-table discussion involving experts to validate the results obtained in the phase II survey and further elaborate on specific requirements that may be critical for developing the first national MCDA framework in the KSA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All the key opinion leaders involved in the study acknowledged the importance of implementing MCDA in the KSA. The Ministry of Health was assigned the responsibility of chairing the MCDA decision process. The experts selected the quantitative, qualitative, and economic criteria to be considered for the MCDA framework. The stakeholders decided to initiate a pilot phase using the deliberative MCDA methodology for the assessment of orphan drugs based on the selected criteria for a period of 1 year and then reevaluate the need to adapt the pragmatic MCDA model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This article describes the novel initiative that examined the feasibility and process required for the development of the first MCDA framework in the KSA to support healthcare decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000013/pdfft?md5=9d066ce5a51135997270f99f78adc5c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109924000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the feasibility of implementing multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and to select the criteria for preparing a national MCDA framework for health technology assessment of orphan drugs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Methods

The study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase I, a targeted literature review was performed to gather relevant information on the implementation of MCDA in healthcare decision making. Phase II was a cross-sectional survey, conducted to obtain insights from different stakeholders and key opinion leaders on specific topics from the KSA perspective. Phase III included a round-table discussion involving experts to validate the results obtained in the phase II survey and further elaborate on specific requirements that may be critical for developing the first national MCDA framework in the KSA.

Results

All the key opinion leaders involved in the study acknowledged the importance of implementing MCDA in the KSA. The Ministry of Health was assigned the responsibility of chairing the MCDA decision process. The experts selected the quantitative, qualitative, and economic criteria to be considered for the MCDA framework. The stakeholders decided to initiate a pilot phase using the deliberative MCDA methodology for the assessment of orphan drugs based on the selected criteria for a period of 1 year and then reevaluate the need to adapt the pragmatic MCDA model.

Conclusion

This article describes the novel initiative that examined the feasibility and process required for the development of the first MCDA framework in the KSA to support healthcare decision making.

沙特阿拉伯首个支持医疗决策的国家多标准决策分析框架的开发步骤。
目的评估实施多标准决策分析(MCDA)的可行性,并为沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)制定孤儿药卫生技术评估国家 MCDA 框架选择标准:研究分三个阶段进行。在第一阶段,进行了有针对性的文献综述,以收集在医疗决策中实施 MCDA 的相关信息。第二阶段是横断面调查,从不同利益相关者和关键意见领袖的角度,了解他们对 KSA 特定主题的见解。第三阶段包括一次有专家参与的圆桌讨论,以验证第二阶段调查所获得的结果,并进一步阐述对于在 KSA 制定首个国家 MCDA 框架至关重要的具体要求:结果:参与研究的所有主要意见领袖都承认在 KSA 实施 MCDA 的重要性。卫生部负责主持 MCDA 决策过程。专家们为 MCDA 框架选择了需要考虑的定量、定性和经济标准。利益相关方决定启动一个试点阶段,根据选定的标准,使用审议型 MCDA 方法评估孤儿药,为期一年,然后重新评估是否需要调整实用型 MCDA 模型:本文介绍了一项新举措,该举措研究了在 KSA 开发首个 MCDA 框架以支持医疗决策的可行性和所需流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信