Season of drought affects growth, but not nonstructural carbohydrates dynamics, in Pinus taeda saplings.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Scott W Oswald, Doug P Aubrey
{"title":"Season of drought affects growth, but not nonstructural carbohydrates dynamics, in Pinus taeda saplings.","authors":"Scott W Oswald, Doug P Aubrey","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In temperate evergreen conifers, growth occurs mostly in summer but photosynthesis proceeds year-round; thus, nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) increase in winter but decrease in summer. Given that mild drought reduces growth but not photosynthesis, a drought in summer should increase NSCs more than one in winter. However, the active regulation hypothesis suggests that to increase future drought resilience, plants might downregulate growth to increase NSCs after a winter drought even if NSCs do not increase during the drought. To test whether this is so, potted Pinus taeda saplings (age $<\\kern-3pt1$ year) were subjected to 6-month droughts in a greenhouse with one treatment receiving drought during winter (September-March), and another during summer (March-September). Both treatments were compared with a control. To measure dry biomass and NSCs, we harvested plants monthly following each drought, while to assess changes in growth rates, we measured height and diameter monthly. While we observed seasonal variation and an overall increase during the study, we found no drought-related changes in NSC dynamics; however, drought did reduce growth. Furthermore, drought in winter did reduce growth during the following summer, but the reduction was less than for a drought in summer. We conclude that the effect of drought on NSCs was too small to detect in our plants. While better control of soil water would have reduced a major source of uncertainty, plants with larger NSC reserves or more intense stress would also yield easier-to-detect effects. Although not definitive, our results suggest that water stress does not lead to dramatic changes in seasonal NSC dynamics in its aftermath, despite what one might expect under the active regulation hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":"119-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In temperate evergreen conifers, growth occurs mostly in summer but photosynthesis proceeds year-round; thus, nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) increase in winter but decrease in summer. Given that mild drought reduces growth but not photosynthesis, a drought in summer should increase NSCs more than one in winter. However, the active regulation hypothesis suggests that to increase future drought resilience, plants might downregulate growth to increase NSCs after a winter drought even if NSCs do not increase during the drought. To test whether this is so, potted Pinus taeda saplings (age $<\kern-3pt1$ year) were subjected to 6-month droughts in a greenhouse with one treatment receiving drought during winter (September-March), and another during summer (March-September). Both treatments were compared with a control. To measure dry biomass and NSCs, we harvested plants monthly following each drought, while to assess changes in growth rates, we measured height and diameter monthly. While we observed seasonal variation and an overall increase during the study, we found no drought-related changes in NSC dynamics; however, drought did reduce growth. Furthermore, drought in winter did reduce growth during the following summer, but the reduction was less than for a drought in summer. We conclude that the effect of drought on NSCs was too small to detect in our plants. While better control of soil water would have reduced a major source of uncertainty, plants with larger NSC reserves or more intense stress would also yield easier-to-detect effects. Although not definitive, our results suggest that water stress does not lead to dramatic changes in seasonal NSC dynamics in its aftermath, despite what one might expect under the active regulation hypothesis.

干旱季节会影响泰达松树苗的生长,但不会影响非结构性碳水化合物的动态变化。
在温带常绿针叶树中,生长主要发生在夏季,但光合作用却终年进行;因此,非结构碳水化合物(NSC)在冬季会增加,但在夏季会减少。鉴于轻度干旱会减少生长,但不会减少光合作用,因此夏季干旱比冬季干旱更能增加非结构碳水化合物。然而,主动调节假说认为,为了提高未来的抗旱能力,植物可能会在冬季干旱后降低生长调节以增加 NSC,即使在干旱期间 NSC 并未增加。为了验证这一点,我们在温室中对盆栽太子参树苗(树龄小于 1 年)进行了为期 6 个月的干旱试验,其中一种处理在冬季(9 月至 3 月)接受干旱,另一种处理在夏季(3 月至 9 月)接受干旱。两种处理均与对照组进行比较。为了测量干生物量和 NSCs,我们在每次干旱后每月收割植物;为了评估生长率的变化,我们每月测量高度和直径。在研究过程中,我们观察到了季节性变化和总体增长,但没有发现 NSC 动态变化与干旱有关;不过,干旱确实降低了生长速度。此外,冬季干旱确实会降低下一个夏季的生长量,但降低的程度低于夏季干旱。我们的结论是,干旱对 NSC 的影响太小,在我们的植物中无法检测到。如果能更好地控制土壤水分,就能减少不确定性的主要来源,但如果植物的 NSC 储备更多或受到的胁迫更强,也会产生更容易检测到的影响。尽管我们的研究结果并不确定,但它表明,尽管根据主动调节假说,水分胁迫并不会导致季节性 NSC 动态发生剧烈变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信