Clinical performance after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in the dominant eye and a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in the nondominant eye.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
William L Soscia, Joaquin O DeRojas, Priya M Mathews, Amy Brutsky, Kerry D Solomon, Richard Potvin, Helga P Sandoval
{"title":"Clinical performance after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in the dominant eye and a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in the nondominant eye.","authors":"William L Soscia, Joaquin O DeRojas, Priya M Mathews, Amy Brutsky, Kerry D Solomon, Richard Potvin, Helga P Sandoval","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>2 clinical practices (Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Center For Sight) in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, unmasked, multicenter, nonrandomized bilateral eye study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the nondominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity (VA) data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm) were collected 3 months postsurgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 37 participants were analyzed. The distance-corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 to -2.50 diopters (D). 36 participants (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. 70% of participants (26/37) reported never wearing spectacles at any distance, and 84% (31/37) were \"completely\" or \"mostly\" satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as \"excellent\" or \"good\" by 92% (34/37) of participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well-tolerated by participants and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"578-584"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11146179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL).

Setting: 2 clinical practices (Carolina Eyecare Physicians, Center For Sight) in the United States.

Design: Prospective, unmasked, multicenter, nonrandomized bilateral eye study.

Methods: Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the nondominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity (VA) data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, and 33 cm) were collected 3 months postsurgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function.

Results: Data from 37 participants were analyzed. The distance-corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 to -2.50 diopters (D). 36 participants (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. 70% of participants (26/37) reported never wearing spectacles at any distance, and 84% (31/37) were "completely" or "mostly" satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as "excellent" or "good" by 92% (34/37) of participants.

Conclusions: This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well-tolerated by participants and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens.

在主视眼植入 Symfony 延伸焦距眼内透镜和在非主视眼植入 Synergy 老花眼矫正眼内透镜后的临床表现。
目的: 评估联合植入延长焦深(EDOF)眼内透镜(IOL)和联合技术多焦点透镜(CT-IOL)后的主观和客观效果:设计:设计:前瞻性、非掩蔽、多中心、非随机双眼研究:方法:为希望减少对眼镜依赖的患者,在其主视眼植入 EDOF 人工晶体,在非主视眼植入 CT 人工晶体。收集手术后 3 个月不同距离(4 米、66 厘米、40 厘米、33 厘米)的屈光度和视力数据,以及距离校正双眼离焦曲线和与眼镜独立性、视觉障碍和整体视觉功能相关的问卷调查结果:对 37 名受试者的数据进行了分析。距离校正双眼离焦曲线显示,在+1.00 D到-2.50 D的所有纬度上,平均视力均优于0.1 logMAR (20/25)。70%的受试者(26/37)表示从未在任何距离佩戴过眼镜,84%的受试者(31/37)对术后的整体视力表示 "完全 "或 "基本 "满意。光晕是最常见的干扰,也是最令人烦恼的干扰,夜间驾驶困难是最常见的视觉功能问题。其次是阅读困难。92%的受试者(34/37)将总体视力评为 "极佳 "或 "良好":结论:受试者对 EDOF/CT-IOL 联合疗法的耐受性良好,与双侧植入任一人工晶体相比,这种疗法可能会带来一些益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信