Characteristics of static balance performance in 4-stage balance test in the healthy older adults.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2024.2312992
Tiantian Wang, Liuxin Yang, Xuan Li, Panpan Su, Dianhuai Meng
{"title":"Characteristics of static balance performance in 4-stage balance test in the healthy older adults.","authors":"Tiantian Wang, Liuxin Yang, Xuan Li, Panpan Su, Dianhuai Meng","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2024.2312992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 4-Stage Balance test is one of the most commonly used tests to assess balance for older adults. Although it is generally accepted that the four positions (including side-by-side (SBSS), semi-tandem (STS), tandem (TS), and single-leg stance (SLS)) in this test are progressively more difficult, there are no studies comparing the balance parameters of the four positions in older adults to prove this result. The purpose of this study is to determine the difficulty of 4 positions in the 4-Stage Balance test and the effect of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities on static balance among healthy older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 115 community-dwelling healthy older adults were included. The postural parameters (including sway range standard deviation (SR), velocity of body sway (V), total sway area (TSA) and sway perimeter (TSP) of the center of pressure) were measured during 8 static postures (including SBSS, left STS, right STS, left TS, right TS, left SLS, right SLS and comfortable stance (CS)). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the postural parameters in 8 static postures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The static balance stability of the five stances in older adults can be ranked in the following sequence: CS > SBSS/STS > TS > SLS. Moreover, changing foot placement in STS, TS and SLS tasks has no influence on stability. This study has been registered in China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065803).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that it is feasible to simplify the 4-Stage Balance test to a 3-Stage Balance test in the older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"563-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2024.2312992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 4-Stage Balance test is one of the most commonly used tests to assess balance for older adults. Although it is generally accepted that the four positions (including side-by-side (SBSS), semi-tandem (STS), tandem (TS), and single-leg stance (SLS)) in this test are progressively more difficult, there are no studies comparing the balance parameters of the four positions in older adults to prove this result. The purpose of this study is to determine the difficulty of 4 positions in the 4-Stage Balance test and the effect of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities on static balance among healthy older adults.

Methods: A total of 115 community-dwelling healthy older adults were included. The postural parameters (including sway range standard deviation (SR), velocity of body sway (V), total sway area (TSA) and sway perimeter (TSP) of the center of pressure) were measured during 8 static postures (including SBSS, left STS, right STS, left TS, right TS, left SLS, right SLS and comfortable stance (CS)). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the postural parameters in 8 static postures.

Results: The static balance stability of the five stances in older adults can be ranked in the following sequence: CS > SBSS/STS > TS > SLS. Moreover, changing foot placement in STS, TS and SLS tasks has no influence on stability. This study has been registered in China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200065803).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that it is feasible to simplify the 4-Stage Balance test to a 3-Stage Balance test in the older adults.

健康老年人在四阶段平衡测试中的静态平衡表现特征。
背景:四阶段平衡测试是评估老年人平衡能力最常用的测试之一。尽管人们普遍认为该测试中的四种姿势(包括并排(SBSS)、半串联(STS)、串联(TS)和单腿站立(SLS))的难度会逐渐增加,但目前还没有研究比较老年人四种姿势的平衡参数来证明这一结果。本研究的目的是确定四阶段平衡测试中 4 种姿势的难度,以及优势下肢和非优势下肢对健康老年人静态平衡的影响:共纳入 115 名居住在社区的健康老年人。在 8 种静态姿势(包括 SBSS、左 STS、右 STS、左 TS、右 TS、左 SLS、右 SLS 和舒适姿势 (CS))中测量姿势参数(包括摇摆范围标准偏差 (SR)、身体摇摆速度 (V)、压力中心的总摇摆面积 (TSA) 和摇摆周长 (TSP))。采用重复测量方差分析对 8 种静态姿势的姿势参数进行分析:老年人五种姿势的静态平衡稳定性可按以下顺序排列:CS>SBSS/STS>TS>SLS。此外,在STS、TS和SLS任务中改变脚的位置对稳定性没有影响。本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2200065803)。结论我们的研究结果表明,将老年人的四阶段平衡测试简化为三阶段平衡测试是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信