Comparison of resumption of ovulation after cessation of oral contraceptives and medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Gynecological Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1080/09513590.2024.2309349
Soo Jin Han, Hoon Kim, Seung-Yup Ku, Chang Suk Suh
{"title":"Comparison of resumption of ovulation after cessation of oral contraceptives and medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.","authors":"Soo Jin Han, Hoon Kim, Seung-Yup Ku, Chang Suk Suh","doi":"10.1080/09513590.2024.2309349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Both oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) are widely used to control menstrual abnormalities in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). We aimed to evaluate the chance of ovulation resumption after cessation of OCPs and MPA in women with PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted of women with PCOS who were treated with OCPs or cyclic MPA from September 2015 to March 2019. After cessation of medication, ovulation was assessed using basal body temperature and/or measurement of serum progesterone. The odds ratio for ovulation resumption was assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Additionally, doubly robust analysis was performed with inverse-probability-weighted analysis and regression adjustment based on the covariate balancing propensity score to adjust for the effect of covariates on the treatment assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 272 women with PCOS, 136 were prescribed OCPs and 136 were prescribed cyclic MPA. Ovulation resumed in 18.4% of women (<i>n</i> = 25) after cessation of MPA and in 24.3% of women (<i>n</i> = 33) after cessation of OCPs. The odds of ovulation resumption in MPA users were comparable with those in OCP users (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.12). After multiple imputation due to missing values, the results did not change substantially (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among women with PCOS, MPA users have a similar chance of ovulation resumption as OCP users after cessation of medication. Cyclic MPA can be a good alternative to OCPs in women for whom OCPs are contraindicated or who decline to take OCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12865,"journal":{"name":"Gynecological Endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecological Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2309349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Both oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) are widely used to control menstrual abnormalities in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). We aimed to evaluate the chance of ovulation resumption after cessation of OCPs and MPA in women with PCOS.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of women with PCOS who were treated with OCPs or cyclic MPA from September 2015 to March 2019. After cessation of medication, ovulation was assessed using basal body temperature and/or measurement of serum progesterone. The odds ratio for ovulation resumption was assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Additionally, doubly robust analysis was performed with inverse-probability-weighted analysis and regression adjustment based on the covariate balancing propensity score to adjust for the effect of covariates on the treatment assignment.

Results: Among 272 women with PCOS, 136 were prescribed OCPs and 136 were prescribed cyclic MPA. Ovulation resumed in 18.4% of women (n = 25) after cessation of MPA and in 24.3% of women (n = 33) after cessation of OCPs. The odds of ovulation resumption in MPA users were comparable with those in OCP users (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.12). After multiple imputation due to missing values, the results did not change substantially (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.89-1.10).

Conclusions: Among women with PCOS, MPA users have a similar chance of ovulation resumption as OCP users after cessation of medication. Cyclic MPA can be a good alternative to OCPs in women for whom OCPs are contraindicated or who decline to take OCPs.

多囊卵巢综合征妇女停用口服避孕药和醋酸甲羟孕酮后恢复排卵的比较。
目的:口服避孕药(OCP)和环状醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)被广泛用于控制多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性的月经异常。我们的目的是评估多囊卵巢综合征妇女停用 OCP 和 MPA 后恢复排卵的几率:我们对 2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 3 月期间接受 OCPs 或周期性 MPA 治疗的 PCOS 女性患者进行了一项回顾性研究。停药后,使用基础体温和/或测量血清孕酮评估排卵情况。采用多变量逻辑回归评估恢复排卵的几率。此外,还使用反概率加权分析和基于协变量平衡倾向评分的回归调整进行了双重稳健分析,以调整协变量对治疗分配的影响:在272名患有多囊卵巢综合征的妇女中,136人接受了OCPs治疗,136人接受了周期性MPA治疗。停用 MPA 后,18.4% 的妇女(n = 25)恢复排卵,停用 OCP 后,24.3% 的妇女(n = 33)恢复排卵。MPA使用者恢复排卵的几率与OCP使用者相当(调整后的几率比(aOR)为1.00,95%置信区间(CI)为0.89-1.12)。在因缺失值而进行多重估算后,结果没有发生重大变化(aOR 0.99,95% CI 0.89-1.10):结论:在患有多囊卵巢综合征的女性中,MPA使用者在停药后恢复排卵的几率与OCP使用者相似。对于禁用 OCP 或拒绝服用 OCP 的妇女,周期性 MPA 可以作为 OCP 的良好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecological Endocrinology
Gynecological Endocrinology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynecological Endocrinology , the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, covers all the experimental, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this ever more important discipline. It includes, amongst others, papers relating to the control and function of the different endocrine glands in females, the effects of reproductive events on the endocrine system, and the consequences of endocrine disorders on reproduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信