The Influence of Traffic Lights Presentation of Dementia Risk Screening Information on Older Adults' Motivations for Risk Reduction in Primary Care Settings.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Diana Matovic, Malene Ahern, Xiaojing Lei, Viviana M Wuthrich
{"title":"The Influence of Traffic Lights Presentation of Dementia Risk Screening Information on Older Adults' Motivations for Risk Reduction in Primary Care Settings.","authors":"Diana Matovic, Malene Ahern, Xiaojing Lei, Viviana M Wuthrich","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed older adults' preferences for how to communicate dementia risk information to maximize motivation for behavior change.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty-nine community-dwelling older adults (aged 61 to 92 years, M=72.93, SD=6.36, 76% women) received dementia risk factor information in 2 formats: \"traffic lights\" (green=risk absent, amber=risk emerging, and red=risk present) or red/risk-only. Participants reported motivation to change risk-related behaviors, motivation to maintain good health behaviors, liking of the formats, categorical preference for traffic lights versus risk-only formats, reasons for preferences (open-ended), total applicable risks, and Motivation to Change Lifestyle and Health Behaviour for Dementia Risk Reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traffic lights presentation was more motivating ( Z =4.16, P <0.001), more liked ( Z =4.80, P <0.001), and preferred, N Traffic =71, N Red =14, χ 2 (1)=38.22, P <0.001, over risk-only. Self-efficacy and motivation to maintain good health behaviors were significant unique predictors of motivation to change risk-related behaviors following traffic lights presentation over age, sex, education, total applicable risks, perceived susceptibility, cues to action, and liking of the traffic lights presentation format. Themes indicated (1) traffic light presentation is informative and clear, and (2) green-light information increases self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Traffic light presentation increases patient motivation to reduce dementia risk. Green-light information increases self-efficacy. Maximizing motivation through information presentation can decrease dementia prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed older adults' preferences for how to communicate dementia risk information to maximize motivation for behavior change.

Method: Eighty-nine community-dwelling older adults (aged 61 to 92 years, M=72.93, SD=6.36, 76% women) received dementia risk factor information in 2 formats: "traffic lights" (green=risk absent, amber=risk emerging, and red=risk present) or red/risk-only. Participants reported motivation to change risk-related behaviors, motivation to maintain good health behaviors, liking of the formats, categorical preference for traffic lights versus risk-only formats, reasons for preferences (open-ended), total applicable risks, and Motivation to Change Lifestyle and Health Behaviour for Dementia Risk Reduction.

Results: Traffic lights presentation was more motivating ( Z =4.16, P <0.001), more liked ( Z =4.80, P <0.001), and preferred, N Traffic =71, N Red =14, χ 2 (1)=38.22, P <0.001, over risk-only. Self-efficacy and motivation to maintain good health behaviors were significant unique predictors of motivation to change risk-related behaviors following traffic lights presentation over age, sex, education, total applicable risks, perceived susceptibility, cues to action, and liking of the traffic lights presentation format. Themes indicated (1) traffic light presentation is informative and clear, and (2) green-light information increases self-efficacy.

Conclusions: Traffic light presentation increases patient motivation to reduce dementia risk. Green-light information increases self-efficacy. Maximizing motivation through information presentation can decrease dementia prevalence.

在初级医疗机构中,痴呆症风险筛查信息的红绿灯显示对老年人降低风险动机的影响》(The Influence of Traffic Lights Presentation of Dementia Risk Screening Information on Older Adults' Motivations for Risk Reduction in Primary Care Settings)。
目的:本研究评估了老年人对如何传达痴呆症风险信息的偏好:本研究评估了老年人对如何传达痴呆症风险信息以最大限度地激发行为改变的偏好:89名居住在社区的老年人(61-92岁,M=72.93,SD=6.36,76%为女性)接受了两种形式的痴呆风险因素信息:"交通灯"(绿色=无风险,黄色=出现风险,红色=存在风险)或红色/仅风险。参与者报告了改变风险相关行为的动机、保持良好健康行为的动机、对形式的喜好、交通信号灯与纯风险形式的分类偏好、偏好原因(开放式)、适用风险总数以及为降低痴呆风险而改变生活方式和健康行为的动机:结果:"交通灯 "形式更能激发患者的积极性(Z=4.16,PC结论:"交通灯 "形式能提高患者降低痴呆风险的积极性:红绿灯信息可提高患者降低痴呆风险的积极性。绿灯信息能提高自我效能感。通过信息展示最大限度地调动患者的积极性可以降低痴呆症的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信