Association between systemic medication use and severity of dry eye signs and symptoms in the DRy eye assessment and management (DREAM) study

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Michelle Guo , Gabriela M. Diaz , Yinxi Yu , Chandani A. Patel , John T. Farrar , Penny A. Asbell , Gui-Shuang Ying , Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study Research Group
{"title":"Association between systemic medication use and severity of dry eye signs and symptoms in the DRy eye assessment and management (DREAM) study","authors":"Michelle Guo ,&nbsp;Gabriela M. Diaz ,&nbsp;Yinxi Yu ,&nbsp;Chandani A. Patel ,&nbsp;John T. Farrar ,&nbsp;Penny A. Asbell ,&nbsp;Gui-Shuang Ying ,&nbsp;Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study Research Group","doi":"10.1016/j.jtos.2024.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Some systemic medications are reported to be associated with dry eye disease (DED), yet their associations with the severity of DED signs and symptoms are not well studied. To evaluate these associations, we performed a secondary analysis of data from the DRy Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 535) were assessed for DED signs using tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer testing, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival lissamine green staining, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and tear osmolarity and DED symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). We derived a composite signs severity score from the 6 DED signs and categorized participant-reported systemic medications into antidepressants, antihistamines, aspirin, corticosteroids, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors, statins, vitamin D3, and medications for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypothyroidism, migraine, and seizure. Generalized linear models were used to compare DED symptom and sign scores between medication users and non-users, with adjustment for factors associated with DED severity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared to non-users, antihistamine users had lower TBUT (p = 0.01) and higher OSDI score (p = 0.02); aspirin users had lower TBUT (p = 0.02); corticosteroid users had lower TBUT (p = 0.02), lower Schirmer test scores (p = 0.03), higher cornea fluorescein staining (p = 0.01), higher composite severity score (p = 0.01), and higher OSDI score (p = 0.03); seizure medication users had higher composite severity score (p = 0.02); vitamin D3 users had lower TBUT (p = 0.001) and greater MGD (p = 0.03); and diuretic users had less MGD (p = 0.03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Certain systemic medications may be associated with more severe DED. This may guide prescription practices in patients with DED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54691,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Surface","volume":"32 ","pages":"Pages 112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Surface","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012424000181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Some systemic medications are reported to be associated with dry eye disease (DED), yet their associations with the severity of DED signs and symptoms are not well studied. To evaluate these associations, we performed a secondary analysis of data from the DRy Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study.

Methods

Participants (N = 535) were assessed for DED signs using tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer testing, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival lissamine green staining, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and tear osmolarity and DED symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). We derived a composite signs severity score from the 6 DED signs and categorized participant-reported systemic medications into antidepressants, antihistamines, aspirin, corticosteroids, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors, statins, vitamin D3, and medications for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypothyroidism, migraine, and seizure. Generalized linear models were used to compare DED symptom and sign scores between medication users and non-users, with adjustment for factors associated with DED severity.

Results

Compared to non-users, antihistamine users had lower TBUT (p = 0.01) and higher OSDI score (p = 0.02); aspirin users had lower TBUT (p = 0.02); corticosteroid users had lower TBUT (p = 0.02), lower Schirmer test scores (p = 0.03), higher cornea fluorescein staining (p = 0.01), higher composite severity score (p = 0.01), and higher OSDI score (p = 0.03); seizure medication users had higher composite severity score (p = 0.02); vitamin D3 users had lower TBUT (p = 0.001) and greater MGD (p = 0.03); and diuretic users had less MGD (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Certain systemic medications may be associated with more severe DED. This may guide prescription practices in patients with DED.

干眼症评估与管理(DREAM)研究中系统用药与干眼症症状和体征严重程度之间的关系
目的据报道,一些全身用药与干眼症(DED)有关,但它们与 DED 症状和体征严重程度的关系还没有得到很好的研究。为了评估这些关联性,我们对干眼症评估和管理(DREAM)研究的数据进行了二次分析。方法使用泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、施尔默试验、角膜荧光素染色、结膜利萨明绿染色、睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)和泪液渗透压评估参与者(N = 535)的干眼症体征,并使用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评估干眼症症状。我们从 6 种 DED 征兆中得出了综合征兆严重程度评分,并将参与者报告的全身用药分为抗抑郁药、抗组胺药、阿司匹林、皮质类固醇、利尿剂、非甾体抗炎药、质子泵抑制剂、他汀类药物、维生素 D3 以及糖尿病、高血压、甲状腺功能减退症、偏头痛和癫痫发作用药。结果与非用药者相比,抗组胺药使用者的TBUT较低(p = 0.01),OSDI评分较高(p = 0.02);阿司匹林使用者的TBUT较低(p = 0.02);皮质类固醇使用者的TBUT较低(p = 0.02),Schirmer测试评分较低(p = 0.结论某些全身用药可能与更严重的 DED 有关。结论某些全身用药可能与更严重的 DED 有关,这可以指导 DED 患者的处方实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocular Surface
Ocular Surface 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
14.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Ocular Surface, a quarterly, a peer-reviewed journal, is an authoritative resource that integrates and interprets major findings in diverse fields related to the ocular surface, including ophthalmology, optometry, genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. Its critical review articles cover the most current knowledge on medical and surgical management of ocular surface pathology, new understandings of ocular surface physiology, the meaning of recent discoveries on how the ocular surface responds to injury and disease, and updates on drug and device development. The journal also publishes select original research reports and articles describing cutting-edge techniques and technology in the field. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信