Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A 27-Year Experience

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Brianna Conte BS , Dana L. Casey MD , Kathryn R. Tringale MD , Joshua Honeyman MD , Nicole J.C. Narayan MD , Michael P. LaQuaglia MD , Justin Ted Gerstle MD , Shakeel Modak MD , Brian H. Kushner MD , Kim Kramer MD , Suzanne L. Wolden MD
{"title":"Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A 27-Year Experience","authors":"Brianna Conte BS ,&nbsp;Dana L. Casey MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn R. Tringale MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Honeyman MD ,&nbsp;Nicole J.C. Narayan MD ,&nbsp;Michael P. LaQuaglia MD ,&nbsp;Justin Ted Gerstle MD ,&nbsp;Shakeel Modak MD ,&nbsp;Brian H. Kushner MD ,&nbsp;Kim Kramer MD ,&nbsp;Suzanne L. Wolden MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>To evaluate outcomes after intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in high-risk </span>neuroblastoma (NB), including local control, overall survival, and toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>This was a single institution retrospective study of 92 pediatric patients with NB treated with IORT from 1995 to 2022. Each IORT application was considered a separate event for a total of 110 sites treated. Local failure was calculated using the cumulative incidence function and survival by Kaplan-Meier method from the day of surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>All patients had high-risk relapsed or treatment refractory disease. Median age was 6 years (range, 2-34 years). Median follow-up for all patients and surviving patients was 16 months and 4 years, respectively. All patients previously received chemotherapy, 93% had prior </span>external beam radiation therapy to the site of IORT (median dose, 21.6 Gy; range, 10-36 Gy), and 94% had a prior surgery for tumor resection. The median IORT dose was 12 Gy (range, 8-18 Gy) and median area treated was 18 cm</span><sup>2</sup> (range, 2.5-60 cm<sup>2</sup>). The cumulative incidence of local failure was 23% at 2 years and 29% at 5 years. The overall survival (OS) was 44% at 2 years and 29% at 5 years. Local failure after IORT was associated with worse OS <strong>(</strong>hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.07-2.84; <em>P</em><span> = .0267). Toxicity from IORT was rare, with postoperative complications likely related to IORT seen in 7 (8%) patients.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study represents the largest, most recent analysis of the efficacy and safety of IORT in patients with relapsed or refractory NB. Less than one-third of patients failed locally at 5 years, and achieving local control affected overall survival. Minimal toxicities directly related to IORT were observed. Overall, IORT is an effective and safe technique to achieve local control in high-risk relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024000018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate outcomes after intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in high-risk neuroblastoma (NB), including local control, overall survival, and toxicity.

Methods and Materials

This was a single institution retrospective study of 92 pediatric patients with NB treated with IORT from 1995 to 2022. Each IORT application was considered a separate event for a total of 110 sites treated. Local failure was calculated using the cumulative incidence function and survival by Kaplan-Meier method from the day of surgery.

Results

All patients had high-risk relapsed or treatment refractory disease. Median age was 6 years (range, 2-34 years). Median follow-up for all patients and surviving patients was 16 months and 4 years, respectively. All patients previously received chemotherapy, 93% had prior external beam radiation therapy to the site of IORT (median dose, 21.6 Gy; range, 10-36 Gy), and 94% had a prior surgery for tumor resection. The median IORT dose was 12 Gy (range, 8-18 Gy) and median area treated was 18 cm2 (range, 2.5-60 cm2). The cumulative incidence of local failure was 23% at 2 years and 29% at 5 years. The overall survival (OS) was 44% at 2 years and 29% at 5 years. Local failure after IORT was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.07-2.84; P = .0267). Toxicity from IORT was rare, with postoperative complications likely related to IORT seen in 7 (8%) patients.

Conclusions

Our study represents the largest, most recent analysis of the efficacy and safety of IORT in patients with relapsed or refractory NB. Less than one-third of patients failed locally at 5 years, and achieving local control affected overall survival. Minimal toxicities directly related to IORT were observed. Overall, IORT is an effective and safe technique to achieve local control in high-risk relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.

术中放疗治疗复发或难治性高危神经母细胞瘤:27 年的治疗经验
目的评估高危神经母细胞瘤(NB)术中放疗(IORT)后的疗效,包括局部控制、总生存率和毒性。方法和材料这是一项单机构回顾性研究,研究对象是1995年至2022年接受IORT治疗的92例NB儿科患者。每次IORT治疗都被视为一个单独的事件,共治疗了110个部位。采用累积发生率函数计算局部失败率,采用卡普兰-梅耶法计算自手术之日起的生存率。中位年龄为6岁(2-34岁)。所有患者和存活患者的中位随访时间分别为16个月和4年。所有患者都曾接受过化疗,93%的患者曾在IORT部位接受过体外放射治疗(中位剂量为21.6 Gy;范围为10-36 Gy),94%的患者曾接受过肿瘤切除手术。IORT剂量中位数为12 Gy(范围为8-18 Gy),治疗面积中位数为18平方厘米(范围为2.5-60平方厘米)。2年和5年的局部失败累积发生率分别为23%和29%。2年和5年的总生存率(OS)分别为44%和29%。IORT 后局部失败与较差的 OS 有关(危险比为 1.74;95% CI 为 1.07-2.84;P = .0267)。IORT引起的毒性很少见,术后并发症可能与IORT有关的患者有7例(8%)。结论我们的研究是对复发或难治性NB患者IORT疗效和安全性进行的最大规模、最新的分析。不到三分之一的患者在5年后局部治疗失败,局部控制的实现影响了总生存率。与IORT直接相关的毒性极小。总的来说,IORT是一种有效而安全的技术,可用于实现高危复发或难治性神经母细胞瘤的局部控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信