Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Adi Wiezel , Michael Barlev , Christopher R. Martos , Douglas T. Kenrick
{"title":"Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership","authors":"Adi Wiezel ,&nbsp;Michael Barlev ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Martos ,&nbsp;Douglas T. Kenrick","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Why are women underrepresented in positions of leadership? According to the “think manager-think male” model, leaders are stereotyped as male—and, in turn, as dominant—and this stereotype translates into preferences. However, status and leadership can be attained not only by dominance but also by prestige—a less sex-typed pathway. Five studies explored the relationship between leader stereotypes and preferences. University students spontaneously imagined both dominant and prestigious leaders as men (Study 1A, <em>N</em> = 148)—and this generalized across occupational domains (Study 1B, <em>N</em> = 220). However, they preferred women and prestigious leaders over men and dominant leaders. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 2692) found this preference for female over male leaders using a large nationally representative U.S. sample from the Pew American Trends Panel. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 461) experimentally replicated the preference for prestigious female over dominant male leader candidates among university students. In Study 4, (<em>N</em><span> = 952) online MTurk participants judged politicians from face photographs and again showed a preference for women, which may have partially been due to the inference that women are more likely to use prestige- over dominance-based leadership strategies. Collectively, findings suggest that the belief that people prefer “alpha male” leaders, which might discourage women from pursuing leadership roles and others from nominating them, needs to be updated.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 292-308"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why are women underrepresented in positions of leadership? According to the “think manager-think male” model, leaders are stereotyped as male—and, in turn, as dominant—and this stereotype translates into preferences. However, status and leadership can be attained not only by dominance but also by prestige—a less sex-typed pathway. Five studies explored the relationship between leader stereotypes and preferences. University students spontaneously imagined both dominant and prestigious leaders as men (Study 1A, N = 148)—and this generalized across occupational domains (Study 1B, N = 220). However, they preferred women and prestigious leaders over men and dominant leaders. Study 2 (N = 2692) found this preference for female over male leaders using a large nationally representative U.S. sample from the Pew American Trends Panel. Study 3 (N = 461) experimentally replicated the preference for prestigious female over dominant male leader candidates among university students. In Study 4, (N = 952) online MTurk participants judged politicians from face photographs and again showed a preference for women, which may have partially been due to the inference that women are more likely to use prestige- over dominance-based leadership strategies. Collectively, findings suggest that the belief that people prefer “alpha male” leaders, which might discourage women from pursuing leadership roles and others from nominating them, needs to be updated.

刻板印象与偏好:重新审视阿尔法男性在领导力中的作用
为什么女性担任领导职务的人数不足?根据 "认为是管理者-认为是男性 "的模式,领导者被定型为男性,进而被定型为支配者,这种定型转化为偏好。然而,地位和领导力不仅可以通过支配地位获得,也可以通过声望获得--这是一种性别刻板印象较少的途径。有五项研究探讨了领导者刻板印象与偏好之间的关系。大学生们自发地将占主导地位和有威望的领导者都想象成男性(研究 1A,人数=148)--而且这种想象在不同职业领域都普遍存在(研究 1B,人数=220)。然而,与男性领导者和支配型领导者相比,他们更喜欢女性领导者和有威望的领导者。研究 2(样本数=2692)通过皮尤美国趋势调查小组(Pew American Trends Panel)在美国全国范围内的大规模抽样调查发现了这种女性领导者优于男性领导者的现象。研究 3(样本数 = 461)通过实验在大学生中复制了对有威望的女性领导者候选人的偏好,而不是对占主导地位的男性领导者候选人的偏好。在研究 4 中,(N = 952)在线 MTurk 参与者通过脸部照片对政治家进行了评判,结果再次显示出对女性的偏好,其部分原因可能是推断女性更有可能使用威望型领导策略,而不是支配型领导策略。总之,研究结果表明,人们更喜欢 "阿尔法男性 "领导者的观点需要更新,这种观点可能会阻碍女性担任领导职务,也会阻碍他人提名女性担任领导职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信