The Bronze Age occupation of the Black Sea coast of Georgia—New insights from settlement mounds of the Colchian plain

IF 1.4 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Hannes Laermanns, Mikheil Elashvili, Giorgi Kirkitadze, Christopher P. Loveluck, Simon Matthias May, Daniel Kelterbaum, Revaz Papuashvili, Helmut Brückner
{"title":"The Bronze Age occupation of the Black Sea coast of Georgia—New insights from settlement mounds of the Colchian plain","authors":"Hannes Laermanns,&nbsp;Mikheil Elashvili,&nbsp;Giorgi Kirkitadze,&nbsp;Christopher P. Loveluck,&nbsp;Simon Matthias May,&nbsp;Daniel Kelterbaum,&nbsp;Revaz Papuashvili,&nbsp;Helmut Brückner","doi":"10.1002/gea.21994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Along the lower course of the Rioni and several minor rivers, more than 70 settlement mounds (local name: <i>Dikhagudzuba</i>) have been identified by field surveys and remote sensing techniques. They give evidence of a formerly densely populated landscape in the coastal lowlands on the Colchian plain (western Georgia) and have been dated to the Bronze Age. As yet, limited information is available on their internal architecture, the chronology of the different layers and their palaeoenvironmental context. Based on archaeological sources, remote sensing measurements of three mounds and sediment cores from one mound and its closer surroundings, our study presents a review of the relevant literature and reveals the internal structure, distribution and spatial extent of the mounds. Geochemical and sedimentological analyses of element contents (X-ray fluorescence) and granulometry helped to identify different stratigraphical layers and differentiate between natural facies and anthropogenic deposits; using the Structure-from-Motion technique the mounds' dimensions were calculated. The studied settlement mounds had relatively small dimension (varying from 30 to 100 m in diameter) and were similar in their stratigraphy. Measurement of elements that can identify types of human activity, notably metals and phosphorus, suggest changing intensities of human occupation, pastoral agriculture and metalworking through the occupation sequence. According to the <sup>14</sup>C chronology, the formation of the settlements occurred during the first half of the second millennium B.C., which confirms the archaeological interpretation of their Bronze Age origin. The narrow age difference between the lowermost and uppermost anthropogenic layers indicates an intentional construction of the mounds, rather than a successive accumulation of construction debris due to the disintegration of loam bricks by weathering. Therefore, they are indeed <i>mounds</i> and not <i>tells</i>. It is most likely that the characteristic circular moats that surround them were the source of their construction material. Fluvial and alluvial processes in a warm and humid climate dominated the environment of the mounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":55117,"journal":{"name":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.21994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.21994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Along the lower course of the Rioni and several minor rivers, more than 70 settlement mounds (local name: Dikhagudzuba) have been identified by field surveys and remote sensing techniques. They give evidence of a formerly densely populated landscape in the coastal lowlands on the Colchian plain (western Georgia) and have been dated to the Bronze Age. As yet, limited information is available on their internal architecture, the chronology of the different layers and their palaeoenvironmental context. Based on archaeological sources, remote sensing measurements of three mounds and sediment cores from one mound and its closer surroundings, our study presents a review of the relevant literature and reveals the internal structure, distribution and spatial extent of the mounds. Geochemical and sedimentological analyses of element contents (X-ray fluorescence) and granulometry helped to identify different stratigraphical layers and differentiate between natural facies and anthropogenic deposits; using the Structure-from-Motion technique the mounds' dimensions were calculated. The studied settlement mounds had relatively small dimension (varying from 30 to 100 m in diameter) and were similar in their stratigraphy. Measurement of elements that can identify types of human activity, notably metals and phosphorus, suggest changing intensities of human occupation, pastoral agriculture and metalworking through the occupation sequence. According to the 14C chronology, the formation of the settlements occurred during the first half of the second millennium B.C., which confirms the archaeological interpretation of their Bronze Age origin. The narrow age difference between the lowermost and uppermost anthropogenic layers indicates an intentional construction of the mounds, rather than a successive accumulation of construction debris due to the disintegration of loam bricks by weathering. Therefore, they are indeed mounds and not tells. It is most likely that the characteristic circular moats that surround them were the source of their construction material. Fluvial and alluvial processes in a warm and humid climate dominated the environment of the mounds.

Abstract Image

青铜时代对格鲁吉亚黑海沿岸的占领--从科尔奇亚平原的聚落土墩中获得的新启示
通过实地考察和遥感技术,在里奥尼河和几条小河的下游发现了 70 多个聚落丘(当地名称:Dikhagudzuba)。它们证明了科尔奇安平原(格鲁吉亚西部)沿海低地以前人口稠密的地貌,其年代可追溯到青铜时代。迄今为止,关于其内部结构、不同地层的年代学及其古环境背景的信息还很有限。根据考古资料、对三个土丘的遥感测量结果以及一个土丘及其周边地区的沉积物岩心,我们的研究对相关文献进行了回顾,并揭示了土丘的内部结构、分布和空间范围。对元素含量(X 射线荧光)和粒度的地球化学和沉积学分析有助于确定不同的地层,并区分自然面和人为沉积物;使用 "从运动看结构 "技术计算了土墩的尺寸。所研究的聚落土墩尺寸相对较小(直径从 30 米到 100 米不等),地层结构相似。对可确定人类活动类型的元素(特别是金属和磷)进行的测量表明,人类占领、畜牧业和金属加工的强度在占领序列中不断变化。根据 14C 年表,聚落形成于公元前第二个千年的前半期,这证实了考古学对其青铜时代起源的解释。最下层和最上层人为地层之间的年龄差异很小,这表明这些土丘是有意建造的,而不是由于黄土砖块风化瓦解造成的建筑碎屑的连续堆积。因此,它们确实是土墩,而不是墓穴。它们周围特有的环形护城河很可能是其建筑材料的来源。在温暖潮湿的气候条件下,冲积和冲积过程主导了土丘的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoarchaeology is an interdisciplinary journal published six times per year (in January, March, May, July, September and November). It presents the results of original research at the methodological and theoretical interface between archaeology and the geosciences and includes within its scope: interdisciplinary work focusing on understanding archaeological sites, their environmental context, and particularly site formation processes and how the analysis of sedimentary records can enhance our understanding of human activity in Quaternary environments. Manuscripts should examine the interrelationship between archaeology and the various disciplines within Quaternary science and the Earth Sciences more generally, including, for example: geology, geography, geomorphology, pedology, climatology, oceanography, geochemistry, geochronology, and geophysics. We also welcome papers that deal with the biological record of past human activity through the analysis of faunal and botanical remains and palaeoecological reconstructions that shed light on past human-environment interactions. The journal also welcomes manuscripts concerning the examination and geological context of human fossil remains as well as papers that employ analytical techniques to advance understanding of the composition and origin or material culture such as, for example, ceramics, metals, lithics, building stones, plasters, and cements. Such composition and provenance studies should be strongly grounded in their geological context through, for example, the systematic analysis of potential source materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信