Travel behaviour and game theory: A review of route choice modeling behaviour

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Furkan Ahmad , Luluwah Al-Fagih
{"title":"Travel behaviour and game theory: A review of route choice modeling behaviour","authors":"Furkan Ahmad ,&nbsp;Luluwah Al-Fagih","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Route choice models are a vital tool for evaluating the impact of transportation policies and infrastructure improvements, such as the addition of new roads, tolls, or congestion charges. They can also be used to predict traffic flow and congestion levels, which is essential for traffic management and control. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and limitations of various game theory (GT) based models used in route choice modelling. The manuscript draws upon the theoretical foundations of game theory to explore the complex decision-making processes of travelers in transportation networks, focusing on factors such as travel time, congestion. The manuscript discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing game theory-based models in practice, including the data requirements, model calibration, and computational complexity. These factors are considered in relation to the suitability of different game theory-based models, including cooperative, non-cooperative, and evolutionary games. The comparative critiques presented in this manuscript provide guidance for future research directions in the field of private route choice modelling, aimed at academic researchers, engineers, policymakers, and industrial communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534524000058/pdfft?md5=85b5cf115c5ed0d3360f7d91f5a1a3dc&pid=1-s2.0-S1755534524000058-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534524000058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Route choice models are a vital tool for evaluating the impact of transportation policies and infrastructure improvements, such as the addition of new roads, tolls, or congestion charges. They can also be used to predict traffic flow and congestion levels, which is essential for traffic management and control. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and limitations of various game theory (GT) based models used in route choice modelling. The manuscript draws upon the theoretical foundations of game theory to explore the complex decision-making processes of travelers in transportation networks, focusing on factors such as travel time, congestion. The manuscript discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing game theory-based models in practice, including the data requirements, model calibration, and computational complexity. These factors are considered in relation to the suitability of different game theory-based models, including cooperative, non-cooperative, and evolutionary games. The comparative critiques presented in this manuscript provide guidance for future research directions in the field of private route choice modelling, aimed at academic researchers, engineers, policymakers, and industrial communities.

旅行行为与博弈论:路线选择行为模型回顾
路线选择模型是评估交通政策和基础设施改进(如增加新道路、收费或征收拥堵费)影响的重要工具。它们还可用于预测交通流量和拥堵程度,这对交通管理和控制至关重要。本手稿旨在全面分析用于路线选择建模的各种基于博弈论(GT)的模型的有效性和局限性。手稿借鉴了博弈论的理论基础,以旅行时间、拥堵等因素为重点,探讨了交通网络中旅行者的复杂决策过程。手稿讨论了在实践中实施基于博弈论的模型所面临的挑战和机遇,包括数据要求、模型校准和计算复杂性。这些因素与基于博弈论的不同模型(包括合作博弈、非合作博弈和演化博弈)的适用性有关。本手稿中的比较评论为私人路线选择建模领域的未来研究方向提供了指导,其目标读者包括学术研究人员、工程师、政策制定者和工业界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信