Sabrina Dixon , Arpita Deb , Todd Archer , Barbara L.F. Kaplan
{"title":"Potential to use cannabinoids as adjunct therapy for dexamethasone: An in vitro study with canine peripheral blood mononuclear cells","authors":"Sabrina Dixon , Arpita Deb , Todd Archer , Barbara L.F. Kaplan","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dexamethasone (dex) is a potent glucocorticoid used to treat a variety of diseases. It is widely used in veterinary medicine in many species; for instance, in dogs, it can be used for emergent cases of anaphylaxis or trauma, management of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia, certain cancers, allergic reactions, and topically for skin or eye inflammation. Dex is not without its side effects, especially when administered systemically, which might compromise compliance and effective treatment. Thus, adjunct therapies have been suggested to allow for decreased dex dosing and reduction in side effects while maintaining immunosuppressive efficacy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential for cannabinoids to serve as adjunct therapies for dex. Immune function was assessed in canine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after treatment with dex with and without cannabidiol (CBD) and/or Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Dex suppressed IFN-γ protein secretion in a concentration-dependent manner and this suppression by low concentrations of dex was enhanced in the presence of CBD, THC, or the combination of CBD and THC. Similar effects were found with <em>INFG</em> and <em>TNFA</em> mRNA expression. These findings provide a rationale for using CBD or THC <em>in vivo</em> to reduce dex dosing and side effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 110727"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242724000138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dexamethasone (dex) is a potent glucocorticoid used to treat a variety of diseases. It is widely used in veterinary medicine in many species; for instance, in dogs, it can be used for emergent cases of anaphylaxis or trauma, management of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia, certain cancers, allergic reactions, and topically for skin or eye inflammation. Dex is not without its side effects, especially when administered systemically, which might compromise compliance and effective treatment. Thus, adjunct therapies have been suggested to allow for decreased dex dosing and reduction in side effects while maintaining immunosuppressive efficacy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential for cannabinoids to serve as adjunct therapies for dex. Immune function was assessed in canine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after treatment with dex with and without cannabidiol (CBD) and/or Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Dex suppressed IFN-γ protein secretion in a concentration-dependent manner and this suppression by low concentrations of dex was enhanced in the presence of CBD, THC, or the combination of CBD and THC. Similar effects were found with INFG and TNFA mRNA expression. These findings provide a rationale for using CBD or THC in vivo to reduce dex dosing and side effects.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.