P66: A systematic review of measures of social connection for people living in long-term care homes

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hannah Chapman, Neha Dewan, Jennifer Bethell, Madalena Liougas, Gill Livingston, Katherine S. McGilton, Andrew Sommerlad
{"title":"P66: A systematic review of measures of social connection for people living in long-term care homes","authors":"Hannah Chapman, Neha Dewan, Jennifer Bethell, Madalena Liougas, Gill Livingston, Katherine S. McGilton, Andrew Sommerlad","doi":"10.1017/s1041610223002466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Social connection is important for health, quality of life and care in long-term care (LTC) homes. However, research on how to improve social connection in LTC has been limited by lack of consensus on best approaches to measurement.Research Objective:We will present a systematic review of measures of social connection developed for use in LTC residents, which aims to identify all existing measures and evaluate their measurement properties including structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and construct validity.Method:We are following Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review methods. We searched multiple bibliographic databases from inception to November 2021 for studies that were conducted in LTC resident populations, quantified any aspect(s) of social connection, and reported at least one psychometric property for the measure(s) of social connection. We conducted a second targeted search in April 2022 based on our list of identified measures, supplemented with a list of measures used in previous research in this population. We are currently evaluating the measurement properties reported for each identified measure in accordance with COSMIN guidelines.Preliminary results of the ongoing study:We have identified 68 studies reporting on 35 measures used to assess multiple aspects of social connection in LTC homes. The majority (n=25) were measures of quality of life, wellbeing or life satisfaction, which included a social connection subdomain, whilst only 10 measures specifically target social connection. From our pooled evaluation of 20 measures to date, we have found that 20% (n=4) have sufficient evidence of structural validity, 15% (n=3) have sufficient internal consistency, 25% (n=5) have sufficient reliability, and 15% (n=3) have sufficient construct validity.Conclusion:Many measures have been used to assess social connection in LTC settings, but few are specifically designed for this purpose and they often have insufficient evidence for psychometric properties. This review will provide detailed evidence of the quality of these measures to enable future researchers to prioritise higher quality tools and will inform our development of a new person-centred social connection measurement tool for LTC residents in the Social Connection in Long-Term Care Home Residents (SONNET) study.","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610223002466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Social connection is important for health, quality of life and care in long-term care (LTC) homes. However, research on how to improve social connection in LTC has been limited by lack of consensus on best approaches to measurement.Research Objective:We will present a systematic review of measures of social connection developed for use in LTC residents, which aims to identify all existing measures and evaluate their measurement properties including structural validity, internal consistency, reliability and construct validity.Method:We are following Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review methods. We searched multiple bibliographic databases from inception to November 2021 for studies that were conducted in LTC resident populations, quantified any aspect(s) of social connection, and reported at least one psychometric property for the measure(s) of social connection. We conducted a second targeted search in April 2022 based on our list of identified measures, supplemented with a list of measures used in previous research in this population. We are currently evaluating the measurement properties reported for each identified measure in accordance with COSMIN guidelines.Preliminary results of the ongoing study:We have identified 68 studies reporting on 35 measures used to assess multiple aspects of social connection in LTC homes. The majority (n=25) were measures of quality of life, wellbeing or life satisfaction, which included a social connection subdomain, whilst only 10 measures specifically target social connection. From our pooled evaluation of 20 measures to date, we have found that 20% (n=4) have sufficient evidence of structural validity, 15% (n=3) have sufficient internal consistency, 25% (n=5) have sufficient reliability, and 15% (n=3) have sufficient construct validity.Conclusion:Many measures have been used to assess social connection in LTC settings, but few are specifically designed for this purpose and they often have insufficient evidence for psychometric properties. This review will provide detailed evidence of the quality of these measures to enable future researchers to prioritise higher quality tools and will inform our development of a new person-centred social connection measurement tool for LTC residents in the Social Connection in Long-Term Care Home Residents (SONNET) study.
P66: 对长期护理院居民社会联系措施的系统回顾
研究背景:社会联系对于长期护理(LTC)机构的健康、生活质量和护理非常重要。研究目的:我们将对用于长期护理院居民的社会联系测量方法进行系统综述,旨在确定所有现有的测量方法,并评估其测量特性,包括结构有效性、内部一致性、可靠性和构建有效性。我们在多个文献数据库中搜索了从开始到 2021 年 11 月在长者护理中心居民群体中进行的研究,这些研究量化了社会联系的任何方面,并报告了社会联系测量方法的至少一个心理测量属性。2022 年 4 月,我们根据已确定的测量方法列表,并辅以之前针对该人群的研究中所使用的测量方法列表,进行了第二次有针对性的搜索。目前,我们正在根据 COSMIN 指南对每项已确定测量方法的测量属性进行评估。正在进行的研究的初步结果:我们已经确定了 68 项研究,报告了 35 项用于评估长者照护中心社会联系多方面的测量方法。其中大部分(n=25)是对生活质量、幸福感或生活满意度的评估,其中包括社会联系子域,而只有 10 项评估专门针对社会联系。从迄今为止对 20 项测量的汇总评估中,我们发现 20% (n=4) 的测量具有充分的结构效度证据,15% (n=3) 的测量具有充分的内部一致性,25% (n=5) 的测量具有充分的可靠性,15% (n=3) 的测量具有充分的建构效度。本综述将为这些测量方法的质量提供详细证据,以便未来的研究人员优先选择质量更高的工具,并为我们在 "长期护理院居民社会联系(SONNET)"研究中为长期护理院居民开发新的以人为本的社会联系测量工具提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信