{"title":"Identification of a Histone Deacetylase 8 Inhibitor through Drug Screenings Based on Machine Learning","authors":"Atika Nurani, Yasunobu Yamashita, Yuuki Taki, Yuri Takada, Yukihiro Itoh, Takayoshi Suzuki","doi":"10.1248/cpb.c23-00577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p>Histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) is a zinc-dependent HDAC that catalyzes the deacetylation of nonhistone proteins. It is involved in cancer development and HDAC8 inhibitors are promising candidates as anticancer agents. However, most reported HDAC8 inhibitors contain a hydroxamic acid moiety, which often causes mutagenicity. Therefore, we used machine learning for drug screening and attempted to identify non-hydroxamic acids as HDAC8 inhibitors. In this study, we established a prediction model based on the random forest (RF) algorithm for screening HDAC8 inhibitors because it exhibited the best predictive accuracy in the training dataset, including data generated by the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). Using the trained RF-SMOTE model, we screened the Osaka University library for compounds and selected 50 virtual hits. However, the 50 hits in the first screening did not show HDAC8-inhibitory activity. In the second screening, using the RF-SMOTE model, which was established by retraining the dataset including 50 inactive compounds, we identified non-hydroxamic acid <b>12</b> as an HDAC8 inhibitor with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 842 nM. Interestingly, its IC<sub>50</sub> values for HDAC1 and HDAC3-inhibitory activity were 38 and 12 µM, respectively, showing that compound <b>12</b> has high HDAC8 selectivity. Using machine learning, we expanded the chemical space for HDAC8 inhibitors and identified non-hydroxamic acid <b>12</b> as a novel HDAC8 selective inhibitor.</p>\n<p></p>\n<img alt=\"\" src=\"https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/pub/cpb/72/2/72_c23-00577/figure/72_c23-00577.png\"/>\n<span style=\"padding-left:5px;\">Fullsize Image</span>","PeriodicalId":9773,"journal":{"name":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c23-00577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) is a zinc-dependent HDAC that catalyzes the deacetylation of nonhistone proteins. It is involved in cancer development and HDAC8 inhibitors are promising candidates as anticancer agents. However, most reported HDAC8 inhibitors contain a hydroxamic acid moiety, which often causes mutagenicity. Therefore, we used machine learning for drug screening and attempted to identify non-hydroxamic acids as HDAC8 inhibitors. In this study, we established a prediction model based on the random forest (RF) algorithm for screening HDAC8 inhibitors because it exhibited the best predictive accuracy in the training dataset, including data generated by the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). Using the trained RF-SMOTE model, we screened the Osaka University library for compounds and selected 50 virtual hits. However, the 50 hits in the first screening did not show HDAC8-inhibitory activity. In the second screening, using the RF-SMOTE model, which was established by retraining the dataset including 50 inactive compounds, we identified non-hydroxamic acid 12 as an HDAC8 inhibitor with an IC50 of 842 nM. Interestingly, its IC50 values for HDAC1 and HDAC3-inhibitory activity were 38 and 12 µM, respectively, showing that compound 12 has high HDAC8 selectivity. Using machine learning, we expanded the chemical space for HDAC8 inhibitors and identified non-hydroxamic acid 12 as a novel HDAC8 selective inhibitor.
期刊介绍:
The CPB covers various chemical topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields dealing with biologically active compounds, natural products, and medicines, while BPB deals with a wide range of biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields including scientific research from basic to clinical studies. For details of their respective scopes, please refer to the submission topic categories below.
Topics: Organic chemistry
In silico science
Inorganic chemistry
Pharmacognosy
Health statistics
Forensic science
Biochemistry
Pharmacology
Pharmaceutical care and science
Medicinal chemistry
Analytical chemistry
Physical pharmacy
Natural product chemistry
Toxicology
Environmental science
Molecular and cellular biology
Biopharmacy and pharmacokinetics
Pharmaceutical education
Chemical biology
Physical chemistry
Pharmaceutical engineering
Epidemiology
Hygiene
Regulatory science
Immunology and microbiology
Clinical pharmacy
Miscellaneous.