Ewa Zabrocka , John D. Roberson , Collin Noldner , Jinkoo Kim , Rushil Patel , Samuel Ryu , Alexander Stessin
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of primary breast cancer in patients not undergoing surgery","authors":"Ewa Zabrocka , John D. Roberson , Collin Noldner , Jinkoo Kim , Rushil Patel , Samuel Ryu , Alexander Stessin","doi":"10.1016/j.advms.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>The purpose was to explore the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in providing local control (LC) for primary breast cancer </span>in patients unable to undergo surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Materials/methods</h3><p>Between 2015 and 2019, 13 non-surgical candidates with 14 lesions were treated with SBRT for primary breast cancer. In 4 cases, SBRT was used after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT; 40–50 Gy/20–25 fractions). SBRT dose was 30–40 Gy in 5 fractions for patients treated with SBRT alone and 25–32 Gy in 4–5 fractions for those treated with SBRT + WBRT. LC and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Response was also assessed using RECIST guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median follow-up was 32 (range: 3.4–70.4) months. Imaging at median 2.2 (0.6–8.1) months post-SBRT showed median 43.2 % (range: 2–100 %) decrease in the largest diameter and median 68.7 % (range: 27.9–100 %) SUV reduction. There were 3 cases of local progression at 8.7–10.6 months. Estimated LC was 100 % at 6 months and 71.6 % at 12, 24 and 36 months.</p><p>Estimated median OS was 100 % at 6 months, 76.9 % at 12 months, and 61.5 % at 24 and 36 months. Acute toxicity (n = 13; 92.9 %) included grade (G)1 (n = 8), G2 (n = 4), and G4 (necrosis; n = 1). Late toxicity included G2 edema (n = 1) and G4 necrosis (n = 2, including 1 consequential late effect). Only patients treated with SBRT + WBRT experienced acute/late G4 toxicity, managed with resection or steroids.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SBRT to primary breast cancer resulted in good LC in non-surgical/metastatic patients. Although necrosis (n = 2) occurred in the SBRT + WBRT group, it was successfully salvaged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7347,"journal":{"name":"Advances in medical sciences","volume":"69 1","pages":"Pages 29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1896112624000026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose was to explore the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in providing local control (LC) for primary breast cancer in patients unable to undergo surgery.
Materials/methods
Between 2015 and 2019, 13 non-surgical candidates with 14 lesions were treated with SBRT for primary breast cancer. In 4 cases, SBRT was used after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT; 40–50 Gy/20–25 fractions). SBRT dose was 30–40 Gy in 5 fractions for patients treated with SBRT alone and 25–32 Gy in 4–5 fractions for those treated with SBRT + WBRT. LC and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Response was also assessed using RECIST guidelines.
Results
Median follow-up was 32 (range: 3.4–70.4) months. Imaging at median 2.2 (0.6–8.1) months post-SBRT showed median 43.2 % (range: 2–100 %) decrease in the largest diameter and median 68.7 % (range: 27.9–100 %) SUV reduction. There were 3 cases of local progression at 8.7–10.6 months. Estimated LC was 100 % at 6 months and 71.6 % at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Estimated median OS was 100 % at 6 months, 76.9 % at 12 months, and 61.5 % at 24 and 36 months. Acute toxicity (n = 13; 92.9 %) included grade (G)1 (n = 8), G2 (n = 4), and G4 (necrosis; n = 1). Late toxicity included G2 edema (n = 1) and G4 necrosis (n = 2, including 1 consequential late effect). Only patients treated with SBRT + WBRT experienced acute/late G4 toxicity, managed with resection or steroids.
Conclusions
SBRT to primary breast cancer resulted in good LC in non-surgical/metastatic patients. Although necrosis (n = 2) occurred in the SBRT + WBRT group, it was successfully salvaged.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Medical Sciences is an international, peer-reviewed journal that welcomes original research articles and reviews on current advances in life sciences, preclinical and clinical medicine, and related disciplines.
The Journal’s primary aim is to make every effort to contribute to progress in medical sciences. The strive is to bridge laboratory and clinical settings with cutting edge research findings and new developments.
Advances in Medical Sciences publishes articles which bring novel insights into diagnostic and molecular imaging, offering essential prior knowledge for diagnosis and treatment indispensable in all areas of medical sciences. It also publishes articles on pathological sciences giving foundation knowledge on the overall study of human diseases. Through its publications Advances in Medical Sciences also stresses the importance of pharmaceutical sciences as a rapidly and ever expanding area of research on drug design, development, action and evaluation contributing significantly to a variety of scientific disciplines.
The journal welcomes submissions from the following disciplines:
General and internal medicine,
Cancer research,
Genetics,
Endocrinology,
Gastroenterology,
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,
Immunology and Allergy,
Pathology and Forensic Medicine,
Cell and molecular Biology,
Haematology,
Biochemistry,
Clinical and Experimental Pathology.