Profitability analysis of southern plantations through timber alone or timber and carbon integration in pine-sweetgum mixes

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jonas C. Moeller , Andres Susaeta , Peter Deegen , Ajay Sharma
{"title":"Profitability analysis of southern plantations through timber alone or timber and carbon integration in pine-sweetgum mixes","authors":"Jonas C. Moeller ,&nbsp;Andres Susaeta ,&nbsp;Peter Deegen ,&nbsp;Ajay Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Due to their high degree of heterogeneity, mixed forest plantations<span> give rise to numerous questions regarding the economic feasibility of this type of forest management. We simulated the growth of loblolly pine mixed in various proportions with white </span></span>oak<span><span> and sweetgum (75–25%, 50–50%, and 25%–75%), two commercially important hardwood species of the southeastern United States, to obtain a better understanding of the optimality of mixed plantation management. The most relevant result was that, in all scenarios, the maximum land expectation values of mixed plantations are higher than the maximum land expectation values of monoculture plantations established for </span>timber production<span> only, and for plantations managed for combined timber production and carbon sequestration<span>. Economically, the optimal mixed forest plantation scenario contains 1125 loblolly pine trees and 375 sweetgum trees per hectare. We identified the density effect between the loblolly pine trees within the mixed plantations as the main factor driving the value of mixed plantations. The mixed white oak and sweetgum trees also increased the maximum land expectation values of the mixed stands in comparison to the less dense monoculture loblolly pine stands. This implies that the incorporation of hardwoods adds timber, but the trees do not represent a substitute for pine. Our analysis showed that mixed forest plantations can be a feasible economic option to diversify the production of timber in the region.</span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to their high degree of heterogeneity, mixed forest plantations give rise to numerous questions regarding the economic feasibility of this type of forest management. We simulated the growth of loblolly pine mixed in various proportions with white oak and sweetgum (75–25%, 50–50%, and 25%–75%), two commercially important hardwood species of the southeastern United States, to obtain a better understanding of the optimality of mixed plantation management. The most relevant result was that, in all scenarios, the maximum land expectation values of mixed plantations are higher than the maximum land expectation values of monoculture plantations established for timber production only, and for plantations managed for combined timber production and carbon sequestration. Economically, the optimal mixed forest plantation scenario contains 1125 loblolly pine trees and 375 sweetgum trees per hectare. We identified the density effect between the loblolly pine trees within the mixed plantations as the main factor driving the value of mixed plantations. The mixed white oak and sweetgum trees also increased the maximum land expectation values of the mixed stands in comparison to the less dense monoculture loblolly pine stands. This implies that the incorporation of hardwoods adds timber, but the trees do not represent a substitute for pine. Our analysis showed that mixed forest plantations can be a feasible economic option to diversify the production of timber in the region.

南方植树造林的盈利能力分析--松树-甜桉混交林中的单纯木材或木材与碳的融合
由于混交林的高度异质性,这种森林管理的经济可行性引起了许多问题。我们模拟了小叶松与美国东南部两种重要的硬木树种--白橡树和甜桉树以不同比例(75%-25%、50%-50% 和 25%-75%)混交的生长情况,以更好地了解混交人工林管理的最优性。最相关的结果是,在所有情况下,混交人工林的最大土地期望值都高于仅为木材生产而建立的单一种植人工林的最大土地期望值,也高于为木材生产和碳封存综合管理而建立的人工林的最大土地期望值。从经济角度看,最佳混交林种植方案每公顷种植 1125 棵龙柏和 375 棵甜胶树。我们发现,混交林中小叶松树之间的密度效应是推动混交林价值的主要因素。与密度较低的单一种植小叶松林地相比,白橡树和甜桉树的混合种植也提高了混合林地的最大土地期望值。这意味着硬木的加入增加了木材,但这些树木并不能替代松树。我们的分析表明,混交林种植是实现该地区木材生产多样化的可行经济选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信