Risk assessment behaviour when eating out in adults with food hypersensitivity

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Rebecca C. Knibb, Lily Hawkins, Cassandra Screti, M. Hazel Gowland, Mamidipudi Thirumala Krishna, George du Toit, Christina J. Jones
{"title":"Risk assessment behaviour when eating out in adults with food hypersensitivity","authors":"Rebecca C. Knibb,&nbsp;Lily Hawkins,&nbsp;Cassandra Screti,&nbsp;M. Hazel Gowland,&nbsp;Mamidipudi Thirumala Krishna,&nbsp;George du Toit,&nbsp;Christina J. Jones","doi":"10.1002/clt2.12336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Food hypersensitivity (FHS) management requires daily risk assessments of all food and drinks consumed to prevent unpleasant and potentially fatal adverse reactions. Most research has focussed on food allergy in children and families. Little is known about the impact on adults or those with other FHS, such as food intolerance or coeliac disease. This study assessed differences in practices and risk assessment behaviours when eating out for adults with FHS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adult UK residents (<i>N</i> = 930; 820 females, 90 males; 95% White; mean age 50 years [±16.6SD]), with food allergy (18%), food intolerance (23%) coeliac disease (44%) or multiple FHS (15%) completed an online survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Adults checked information to identify foods causing a reaction always or most of the time when eating out. However, adults with food intolerance reported checking significantly less often than adults with other FHS (all <i>p</i>s &lt; 0.001). Adults reporting more severe FHS, medical rather than self-diagnosis of FHS, previous anaphylaxis, had called an ambulance or been in hospital due to a reaction checked information significantly more often (all <i>p</i>s &lt; 0.001), but were also less confident in the information provided (all <i>p</i>s &lt; 0.05). Adults with allergy, coeliac disease or multiple FHS were also less confident in written and verbal information provided than those with food intolerance (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The type of FHS, greater perceived severity of FHS and having a medical diagnosis consistently predicted risk assessment behaviours when eating out (all <i>p</i>s &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians, patients and the food industry should be aware that the type of FHS, patient-perceived severity and past experience of reactions affect risk assessment behaviours when eating out. This should be considered when providing clinical advice and emergency plans.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.12336","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.12336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Food hypersensitivity (FHS) management requires daily risk assessments of all food and drinks consumed to prevent unpleasant and potentially fatal adverse reactions. Most research has focussed on food allergy in children and families. Little is known about the impact on adults or those with other FHS, such as food intolerance or coeliac disease. This study assessed differences in practices and risk assessment behaviours when eating out for adults with FHS.

Methods

Adult UK residents (N = 930; 820 females, 90 males; 95% White; mean age 50 years [±16.6SD]), with food allergy (18%), food intolerance (23%) coeliac disease (44%) or multiple FHS (15%) completed an online survey.

Results

Adults checked information to identify foods causing a reaction always or most of the time when eating out. However, adults with food intolerance reported checking significantly less often than adults with other FHS (all ps < 0.001). Adults reporting more severe FHS, medical rather than self-diagnosis of FHS, previous anaphylaxis, had called an ambulance or been in hospital due to a reaction checked information significantly more often (all ps < 0.001), but were also less confident in the information provided (all ps < 0.05). Adults with allergy, coeliac disease or multiple FHS were also less confident in written and verbal information provided than those with food intolerance (p < 0.01). The type of FHS, greater perceived severity of FHS and having a medical diagnosis consistently predicted risk assessment behaviours when eating out (all ps < 0.001).

Conclusion

Clinicians, patients and the food industry should be aware that the type of FHS, patient-perceived severity and past experience of reactions affect risk assessment behaviours when eating out. This should be considered when providing clinical advice and emergency plans.

食物过敏症成人外出就餐时的风险评估行为
背景 食物过敏(FHS)管理要求每天对食用的所有食物和饮料进行风险评估,以防止出现令人不快甚至可能致命的不良反应。大多数研究都集中在儿童和家庭的食物过敏问题上。而对于成年人或患有其他食物过敏症(如食物不耐受症或腹腔疾病)的人来说,他们所受的影响却知之甚少。本研究评估了患有 FHS 的成年人外出就餐时的做法和风险评估行为的差异。 方法 英国成年居民(N = 930;820 名女性,90 名男性;95% 白人;平均年龄 50 岁 [±16.6SD])、食物过敏症患者(18%)、食物不耐受患者(23%)、乳糜泻患者(44%)或多种食物过敏症患者(15%)完成了一项在线调查。 结果 成人在外出就餐时,总是或大部分时间都会查看信息,以确定会引起反应的食物。然而,患有食物不耐受症的成年人比患有其他食物过敏症的成年人检查的次数要少得多(所有数据均为 0.001)。报告有更严重的食物不耐受症、食物不耐受症的医学诊断而非自我诊断、曾发生过敏性休克、曾因反应而叫过救护车或住过医院的成年人检查信息的频率明显更高(所有 ps < 0.001),但他们对所提供信息的信心也更低(所有 ps < 0.05)。与食物不耐受者相比,患有过敏症、腹腔疾病或多种食物过敏症的成年人对所提供的书面和口头信息的信心也较低(P < 0.01)。食物不耐受症的类型、食物不耐受症的严重程度以及是否有医学诊断一致地预示着外出就餐时的风险评估行为(所有 ps 均为 0.001)。 结论 临床医生、患者和食品行业应该意识到,FHS 的类型、患者感知的严重程度和以往的反应经验会影响外出就餐时的风险评估行为。在提供临床建议和应急计划时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信