Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Dayong Zhang , Hao Men , Zhaoxin Zhang
{"title":"Assessing the stability of collaboration networks: A structural cohesion analysis perspective","authors":"Dayong Zhang ,&nbsp;Hao Men ,&nbsp;Zhaoxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038/pdfft?md5=10df3868fe122aadb2793b254dde7e62&pid=1-s2.0-S1751157724000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In collaboration networks, a stable structure can lead to trust and enhance group members’ ties, in turn reducing conflicts and promoting communication and cooperation. Therefore, network stability assessment, especially for collaboration networks, is essential for facilitating the achievement of group goals. However, most previous studies have considered only a fundamental understanding of network stability from the perspective of network connectivity or interpersonal relationships. Few studies have been conducted to reveal the influence of endogenous structural cohesion on network stability. In fact, greater structural cohesion indicates greater adaptability in uncertain environments. Thus, we propose evaluating the stability of collaboration networks from a structural cohesion perspective. Our study focuses on two dimensions of structural cohesion: core member identification and structural robustness measurements. Considering the unique structure of collaboration networks, a new algorithm, named the improved K-shell decomposition algorithm, is proposed to identify the core member set embedded in the innermost layer of a network. Compared with traditional identification algorithms, our algorithm can achieve a better trade-off between computational accuracy and computational complexity. Experimental results obtained on real-world networks verify the performance of our algorithm. In addition, it was found that the stability of collaboration networks can be effectively improved through targeted prevention efforts at the core members identified by our algorithm.

评估协作网络的稳定性:结构凝聚力分析视角
在协作网络中,稳定的结构可以带来信任,加强团体成员之间的联系,从而减少冲突,促进交流与合作。因此,网络稳定性评估,尤其是协作网络的稳定性评估,对于促进群体目标的实现至关重要。然而,以往的大多数研究都只是从网络连接性或人际关系的角度来考虑对网络稳定性的基本认识。很少有研究揭示内生结构凝聚力对网络稳定性的影响。事实上,结构凝聚力越强,表明在不确定环境中的适应能力越强。因此,我们建议从结构凝聚力的角度来评估协作网络的稳定性。我们的研究侧重于结构凝聚力的两个维度:核心成员识别和结构稳健性测量。考虑到协作网络的独特结构,我们提出了一种新算法--改进的 K 壳分解算法--来识别嵌入网络最内层的核心成员集。与传统的识别算法相比,我们的算法能在计算精度和计算复杂度之间实现更好的权衡。在实际网络中获得的实验结果验证了我们算法的性能。此外,实验还发现,通过对算法识别出的核心成员进行有针对性的防范,可以有效提高协作网络的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信