MICROBACTERIAL PROFILE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AND THEIR PATTERN OF SENSITIVITY IN TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NORTH CENTRAL HOSPITAL, NIGERIA.

Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01
A A Abiodun, A O Adekanye, C N D Nwachukwu, T S Ayanbeku, J A Abiodun
{"title":"MICROBACTERIAL PROFILE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AND THEIR PATTERN OF SENSITIVITY IN TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NORTH CENTRAL HOSPITAL, NIGERIA.","authors":"A A Abiodun, A O Adekanye, C N D Nwachukwu, T S Ayanbeku, J A Abiodun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a problem in surgical practice despite the improvement in advanced technology and the use of antibiotics. Also, there is also a growing menace of antibiotic resistance which poses a great challenge in treating SSI. The study aimed to find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for surgical site infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>It was a descriptive study carried out in Federal Medical Centre, Bida. 500 surgical procedures were carried out and samples were obtained from 73 patients that showed clinical evidence of SSI for culture and susceptibility test. Samples were collected from each patient using a swab stick. Bacteriological culture examination and identification were done following standard microbiological techniques. Susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer technique according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards institute 26th edition. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 73 samples taken, 83 isolates were obtained while five samples yielded no growth. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were predominant in 73(88.1%) with the dominant being E. Coli species (38.6%). From the strains that were isolated, there were 9(10.8%) Staph aureus was the only Gram-positive organism. Concerning antibiotic susceptibility, the results demonstrated remarkably high multidrug resistance. However, the meropenems and amikacin demonstrated good activities against all gram-negative isolates. The resistance pattern of enterobacteriaceae to tested antibiotics were to ciprofloxacin (90.2%) levofloxacin (82.2%) augmentin (88.5%) ceftriaxone (85.2%) ceftazidime (80.3%), gentamicin (80.3%) meropenems (14.8%) amikacin (16.4%.).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated a high alarming rate of multidrug resistance following SSI and this should call for concerns and surveillance among surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a problem in surgical practice despite the improvement in advanced technology and the use of antibiotics. Also, there is also a growing menace of antibiotic resistance which poses a great challenge in treating SSI. The study aimed to find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for surgical site infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile.

Material and methods: It was a descriptive study carried out in Federal Medical Centre, Bida. 500 surgical procedures were carried out and samples were obtained from 73 patients that showed clinical evidence of SSI for culture and susceptibility test. Samples were collected from each patient using a swab stick. Bacteriological culture examination and identification were done following standard microbiological techniques. Susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer technique according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards institute 26th edition. Data were analysed using SPSS 26.

Results: Out of the 73 samples taken, 83 isolates were obtained while five samples yielded no growth. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were predominant in 73(88.1%) with the dominant being E. Coli species (38.6%). From the strains that were isolated, there were 9(10.8%) Staph aureus was the only Gram-positive organism. Concerning antibiotic susceptibility, the results demonstrated remarkably high multidrug resistance. However, the meropenems and amikacin demonstrated good activities against all gram-negative isolates. The resistance pattern of enterobacteriaceae to tested antibiotics were to ciprofloxacin (90.2%) levofloxacin (82.2%) augmentin (88.5%) ceftriaxone (85.2%) ceftazidime (80.3%), gentamicin (80.3%) meropenems (14.8%) amikacin (16.4%.).

Conclusion: The study demonstrated a high alarming rate of multidrug resistance following SSI and this should call for concerns and surveillance among surgeons.

尼日利亚中北部三级医院手术部位感染的微生物概况及其敏感性模式。
背景:尽管先进技术和抗生素的使用有所改进,但手术部位感染(SSI)仍然是外科实践中的一个问题。此外,抗生素耐药性的威胁也越来越大,这给治疗 SSI 带来了巨大挑战。本研究旨在找出导致手术部位感染的最常见细菌病原体及其抗生素敏感性:这是一项在比达联邦医疗中心进行的描述性研究。共进行了 500 例外科手术,并从 73 名有 SSI 临床证据的患者身上采集了样本进行培养和药敏试验。每位患者的样本都是用棉签采集的。细菌培养检查和鉴定按照标准微生物学技术进行。根据临床和实验室标准协会第 26 版的规定,采用 Kirby-Bauer 技术进行药敏试验。数据使用 SPSS 26 进行分析:在采集的 73 份样本中,共分离出 83 株细菌,其中 5 份样本中的细菌没有生长。革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)在 73 个样本(88.1%)中占主导地位,其中最主要的是大肠杆菌(38.6%)。在分离出的菌株中,有 9 株(10.8%)金黄色葡萄球菌是唯一的革兰氏阳性菌。在抗生素敏感性方面,结果显示出明显的多重耐药性。不过,美罗培南和阿米卡星对所有革兰氏阴性分离菌都表现出良好的活性。肠杆菌科细菌对测试抗生素的耐药模式为环丙沙星(90.2%)、左氧氟沙星(82.2%)、增强素(88.5%)、头孢曲松(85.2%)、头孢他啶(80.3%)、庆大霉素(80.3%)、美罗培南(14.8%)和阿米卡星(16.4%):该研究表明,SSI 感染后多种药物耐药性的发生率很高,令人担忧,应引起外科医生的关注和监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信