A data-driven typology of emotion regulation profiles.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1037/emo0001306
João F Guassi Moreira, Razia S Sahi, Maria D Calderon Leon, Natalie M Saragosa-Harris, Yael H Waizman, Anna E Sedykin, Emilia Ninova, Tara S Peris, James J Gross, Jennifer A Silvers
{"title":"A data-driven typology of emotion regulation profiles.","authors":"João F Guassi Moreira, Razia S Sahi, Maria D Calderon Leon, Natalie M Saragosa-Harris, Yael H Waizman, Anna E Sedykin, Emilia Ninova, Tara S Peris, James J Gross, Jennifer A Silvers","doi":"10.1037/emo0001306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Typologies serve to organize knowledge and advance theory for many scientific disciplines, including more recently in the social and behavioral sciences. To date, however, no typology exists to categorize an individual's use of emotion regulation strategies. This is surprising given that emotion regulation skills are used daily and that deficits in this area are robustly linked with mental health symptoms. Here, we attempted to identify and validate a working typology of emotion regulation across six samples (collectively comprised of 1,492 participants from multiple populations) by using a combination of computational techniques, psychometric models, and growth curve modeling. We uncovered evidence for three types of regulators: a type that infrequently uses emotion regulation strategies (Lo), a type that uses them frequently but indiscriminately (Hi), and a third type that selectively uses some (cognitive reappraisal and situation selection), but not other (expressive suppression), emotion regulation strategies frequently (Mix). Results showed that membership in the Hi and Mix types is associated with better mental health, with the Mix type being the most adaptive of the three. These differences were stable over time and across different samples. These results carry important implications for both our basic understanding of emotion regulation behavior and for informing future interventions aimed at improving mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typologies serve to organize knowledge and advance theory for many scientific disciplines, including more recently in the social and behavioral sciences. To date, however, no typology exists to categorize an individual's use of emotion regulation strategies. This is surprising given that emotion regulation skills are used daily and that deficits in this area are robustly linked with mental health symptoms. Here, we attempted to identify and validate a working typology of emotion regulation across six samples (collectively comprised of 1,492 participants from multiple populations) by using a combination of computational techniques, psychometric models, and growth curve modeling. We uncovered evidence for three types of regulators: a type that infrequently uses emotion regulation strategies (Lo), a type that uses them frequently but indiscriminately (Hi), and a third type that selectively uses some (cognitive reappraisal and situation selection), but not other (expressive suppression), emotion regulation strategies frequently (Mix). Results showed that membership in the Hi and Mix types is associated with better mental health, with the Mix type being the most adaptive of the three. These differences were stable over time and across different samples. These results carry important implications for both our basic understanding of emotion regulation behavior and for informing future interventions aimed at improving mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

数据驱动的情绪调节特征类型学。
在许多科学学科中,包括最近在社会和行为科学中,类型学起到了组织知识和推进理论的作用。然而,迄今为止,还没有一种类型学可以对个人使用情绪调节策略的情况进行分类。鉴于情绪调节技能每天都在使用,而且这方面的缺陷与心理健康症状密切相关,这种情况令人惊讶。在这里,我们试图通过计算技术、心理测量模型和成长曲线建模相结合的方法,在六个样本(共包括来自多个人群的 1,492 名参与者)中识别并验证情绪调节的有效类型。我们发现了三种类型的情绪调节者:一种是不经常使用情绪调节策略的类型(Lo),一种是经常使用但不加选择的类型(Hi),第三种是有选择性地经常使用某些(认知再评价和情境选择)情绪调节策略,而不经常使用其他(表达压抑)情绪调节策略的类型(Mix)。结果表明,属于 "高 "和 "混合 "类型的人心理更健康,而 "混合 "类型是三种类型中适应能力最强的。这些差异在不同时期和不同样本中都是稳定的。这些结果对我们基本了解情绪调节行为以及为未来旨在改善心理健康的干预措施提供信息具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信