Cognitive abilities and engagement in advance care planning among older adults: Results of a Swiss populational study.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Psychology and Aging Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1037/pag0000794
Robert Reinecke, Sarah Vilpert, Gian Domenico Borasio, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer
{"title":"Cognitive abilities and engagement in advance care planning among older adults: Results of a Swiss populational study.","authors":"Robert Reinecke, Sarah Vilpert, Gian Domenico Borasio, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer","doi":"10.1037/pag0000794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals often wait until the last moment to plan their end-of-life (EOL) care. Yet, decision-making capacity decreases with age, which could compromise engagement in and the effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP). Little is known about the association between cognitive abilities and the steps involved in the multifaceted process of ACP in older adults. The present study aims to better understand the association of global cognitive competence with engagement in ACP in a nationally representative sample of older adults in Switzerland. Global cognitive competence was measured via verbal fluency, immediate and delayed memory, basic calculation skills, and temporal orientation. Engagement in ACP included approving advance directives, having discussed EOL preferences, having a living will, and having a health care proxy. We analyzed data of 1,936 respondents aged 55+ from a paper-and-pencil questionnaire that was administered as part of Wave 6 (2015) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe in Switzerland using logistic regression models. Respondents with reduced global cognitive competence are less likely to have discussed their EOL preferences with others and to have a living will. Our results also indicate an interaction between age and cognition with respect to having a living will. Individuals with lower global cognitive competence in the oldest age group-adults aged 75 and older-are less likely to have a living will. Our findings highlight that low global cognitive competence can be seen as a barrier to engagement in ACP, particularly among adults 75 years and older. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals often wait until the last moment to plan their end-of-life (EOL) care. Yet, decision-making capacity decreases with age, which could compromise engagement in and the effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP). Little is known about the association between cognitive abilities and the steps involved in the multifaceted process of ACP in older adults. The present study aims to better understand the association of global cognitive competence with engagement in ACP in a nationally representative sample of older adults in Switzerland. Global cognitive competence was measured via verbal fluency, immediate and delayed memory, basic calculation skills, and temporal orientation. Engagement in ACP included approving advance directives, having discussed EOL preferences, having a living will, and having a health care proxy. We analyzed data of 1,936 respondents aged 55+ from a paper-and-pencil questionnaire that was administered as part of Wave 6 (2015) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe in Switzerland using logistic regression models. Respondents with reduced global cognitive competence are less likely to have discussed their EOL preferences with others and to have a living will. Our results also indicate an interaction between age and cognition with respect to having a living will. Individuals with lower global cognitive competence in the oldest age group-adults aged 75 and older-are less likely to have a living will. Our findings highlight that low global cognitive competence can be seen as a barrier to engagement in ACP, particularly among adults 75 years and older. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

老年人的认知能力与预先护理规划的参与度:一项瑞士人口研究的结果。
人们往往等到最后一刻才计划自己的临终关怀(EOL)。然而,决策能力会随着年龄的增长而下降,这可能会影响预先护理计划(ACP)的参与度和有效性。关于老年人的认知能力与 ACP 多方面过程中所涉及的步骤之间的关系,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在通过对瑞士具有全国代表性的老年人进行抽样调查,更好地了解总体认知能力与参与 ACP 的关系。全面认知能力通过语言流畅性、即时记忆和延迟记忆、基本计算能力和时间定向进行测量。参与 ACP 包括批准预先指示、讨论过临终前的偏好、有生前预嘱以及有医疗保健代理。我们使用逻辑回归模型分析了 1,936 名 55 岁以上受访者的数据,这些数据来自瑞士进行的第六波(2015 年)欧洲健康、老龄和退休调查的纸笔问卷。全球认知能力下降的受访者不太可能与他人讨论过自己的临终偏好,也不太可能有生前预嘱。我们的研究结果还表明,年龄与认知能力之间存在相互作用。在最年长的年龄组--75 岁及以上的成年人中,整体认知能力较低的人更不可能订立生前预嘱。我们的研究结果突出表明,整体认知能力较低可被视为参与 ACP 的障碍,尤其是在 75 岁及以上的成年人中。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信