Effects of aromatherapy on nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Ju Hyun Ahn, Myoungsuk Kim, Ri Whaol Kim
{"title":"Effects of aromatherapy on nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ju Hyun Ahn,&nbsp;Myoungsuk Kim,&nbsp;Ri Whaol Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><em>and purpose</em>: Aromatherapy offers a low-risk solution for effectively managing common nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess its impact on these symptoms to facilitate practical guidelines establishment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for articles published until April 30, 2023. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of aromatherapy on nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer (age ≥18 years). The effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with a random effects model. Subgroup analyses, meta-analysis of variance, and meta-regression were performed using the “meta” package in R version 4.0.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed; two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool 2.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-five RCTs across 10 articles revealed that aromatherapy reduced overall nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer with significant efficacy (SMD = −0.81, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −1.11 to −0.52). Furthermore, aromatherapy reduced nausea (SMD = −0.85, 95 % CI: −1.23 to −0.46) and combined nausea and vomiting (SMD = −1.08, 95 % CI: −1.68 to −0.47), but not vomiting alone (SMD = −0.24, 95 % CI: −1.03 to 0.55). Inhalation and massage yielded positive results, especially in chemotherapy-induced cases; peppermint oil was particularly successful.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings underscore aromatherapy's value in managing cancer treatment-associated nausea and vomiting. Conclusive evidence on aromatherapy-led nausea reduction is lacking due to limited RCTs; research is warranted for robust conclusions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

and purpose: Aromatherapy offers a low-risk solution for effectively managing common nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess its impact on these symptoms to facilitate practical guidelines establishment.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for articles published until April 30, 2023. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of aromatherapy on nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer (age ≥18 years). The effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with a random effects model. Subgroup analyses, meta-analysis of variance, and meta-regression were performed using the “meta” package in R version 4.0.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed; two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool 2.0.

Results

Twenty-five RCTs across 10 articles revealed that aromatherapy reduced overall nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer with significant efficacy (SMD = −0.81, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −1.11 to −0.52). Furthermore, aromatherapy reduced nausea (SMD = −0.85, 95 % CI: −1.23 to −0.46) and combined nausea and vomiting (SMD = −1.08, 95 % CI: −1.68 to −0.47), but not vomiting alone (SMD = −0.24, 95 % CI: −1.03 to 0.55). Inhalation and massage yielded positive results, especially in chemotherapy-induced cases; peppermint oil was particularly successful.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore aromatherapy's value in managing cancer treatment-associated nausea and vomiting. Conclusive evidence on aromatherapy-led nausea reduction is lacking due to limited RCTs; research is warranted for robust conclusions.

芳香疗法对癌症患者恶心和呕吐的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景和目的:芳香疗法为有效控制癌症患者常见的恶心和呕吐提供了一种低风险的解决方案。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估芳香疗法对这些症状的影响,以便于制定切实可行的指南。方法:检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、CINAHL和Embase上截至2023年4月30日发表的文章。纳入标准是有关芳香疗法对癌症患者(年龄≥18 岁)恶心和呕吐影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。效应大小采用随机效应模型的标准化平均差(SMD)计算。使用 4.0.2 版 R 软件包 "meta "进行了亚组分析、方差分析和元回归。异质性使用 I2 统计量进行评估。结果10篇文章中的25项RCT显示,芳香疗法能显著减少癌症患者的恶心和呕吐症状(SMD = -0.81,95%置信区间[CI]:-1.11至-0.52)。此外,芳香疗法还能减轻恶心(SMD = -0.85,95 % 置信区间:-1.23 至 -0.46)以及恶心和呕吐(SMD = -1.08,95 % 置信区间:-1.68 至 -0.47),但不能减轻单独的呕吐(SMD = -0.24,95 % 置信区间:-1.03 至 0.55)。吸入和按摩产生了积极的效果,尤其是在化疗引起的病例中;薄荷油尤其成功。由于 RCT 研究有限,因此还缺乏有关芳香疗法减轻恶心的确凿证据;需要进行研究才能得出可靠的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信