The relationship between genetic diversity, function, and stability in marine foundation species

IF 7.6 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
BioScience Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1093/biosci/biad123
Anastasia Konefal, Amanda Kirkland, Rebecca Gilpin, Kathryn Wyssmann, Nicola M Anthony, Just Cebrian, T Erin Cox
{"title":"The relationship between genetic diversity, function, and stability in marine foundation species","authors":"Anastasia Konefal, Amanda Kirkland, Rebecca Gilpin, Kathryn Wyssmann, Nicola M Anthony, Just Cebrian, T Erin Cox","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biad123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seagrasses, corals, marsh plants, kelps, and mangroves support valuable coastal ecosystems but are threatened by environmental stressors. The need to manage these foundation taxa has spurred more than a decade of study on the relationship between genetic diversity and function or stability. We synthesized this literature base (129 relevant publications) and found more reported instances of neutral to positive relationships between genetic diversity and function than negative. However, much of the scientific understanding is based on the response of three genera and from unreplicated observational studies that correlate genetic diversity to measured response variables. When a disturbance was present, the studies often lacked controls or baseline data. Only 5.5% of the studies robustly tested for stability. These shortcomings preclude a rigorous evaluation of whether more genetically diverse foundation populations increase stability and hinder the use of genetics-based conservation strategies. Future studies should be focused on diverse species and ecosystem-level impacts using manipulative designs.","PeriodicalId":9003,"journal":{"name":"BioScience","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seagrasses, corals, marsh plants, kelps, and mangroves support valuable coastal ecosystems but are threatened by environmental stressors. The need to manage these foundation taxa has spurred more than a decade of study on the relationship between genetic diversity and function or stability. We synthesized this literature base (129 relevant publications) and found more reported instances of neutral to positive relationships between genetic diversity and function than negative. However, much of the scientific understanding is based on the response of three genera and from unreplicated observational studies that correlate genetic diversity to measured response variables. When a disturbance was present, the studies often lacked controls or baseline data. Only 5.5% of the studies robustly tested for stability. These shortcomings preclude a rigorous evaluation of whether more genetically diverse foundation populations increase stability and hinder the use of genetics-based conservation strategies. Future studies should be focused on diverse species and ecosystem-level impacts using manipulative designs.
海洋基础物种遗传多样性、功能和稳定性之间的关系
海草、珊瑚、沼泽植物、海带和红树林支撑着宝贵的沿岸生态系统,但也受到环境压力的威胁。由于需要管理这些基础类群,十多年来人们一直在研究遗传多样性与功能或稳定性之间的关系。我们综合了这些文献资料(129 篇相关论文),发现遗传多样性与功能之间中性到积极关系的报道多于消极关系的报道。然而,大部分科学认识都是基于三个种属的反应,以及将遗传多样性与测量反应变量相关联的未重复观察研究。当存在干扰时,研究往往缺乏对照或基线数据。只有 5.5% 的研究对稳定性进行了稳健的测试。这些缺陷妨碍了对遗传多样性更高的基础种群是否会提高稳定性进行严格评估,并阻碍了基于遗传学的保护策略的使用。未来的研究应重点关注不同物种和生态系统层面的影响,并采用操控性设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioScience
BioScience 生物-生物学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioScience is a monthly journal that has been in publication since 1964. It provides readers with authoritative and current overviews of biological research. The journal is peer-reviewed and heavily cited, making it a reliable source for researchers, educators, and students. In addition to research articles, BioScience also covers topics such as biology education, public policy, history, and the fundamental principles of the biological sciences. This makes the content accessible to a wide range of readers. The journal includes professionally written feature articles that explore the latest advancements in biology. It also features discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), and columns on policy (Washington Watch) and education (Eye on Education).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信