A systematic literature review of computer vision-based biomechanical models for physical workload estimation.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2308705
Darlington Egeonu, Bochen Jia
{"title":"A systematic literature review of computer vision-based biomechanical models for physical workload estimation.","authors":"Darlington Egeonu, Bochen Jia","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2308705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ergonomic risks, driven by strenuous physical demands in complex work settings, are prevalent across industries. Addressing these challenges through detailed assessment and effective interventions enhances safety and employee well-being. Proper and timely measurement of physical workloads is the initial step towards holistic ergonomic control. This study comprehensively explores existing computer vision-based biomechanical analysis methods for workload assessment, assessing their performance against traditional techniques, and categorising them for easier use. Recent strides in artificial intelligence have revolutionised workload assessment, especially in realistic work settings where conventional methods fall short. However, understanding the accuracy, characteristics, and practicality of computer vision-based methods versus traditional approaches remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, a literature review along with a meta-analysis was completed in this study to illuminate model accuracy, advantages, and challenges, offering valuable insights for refined technology implementation in diverse work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"139-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2308705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ergonomic risks, driven by strenuous physical demands in complex work settings, are prevalent across industries. Addressing these challenges through detailed assessment and effective interventions enhances safety and employee well-being. Proper and timely measurement of physical workloads is the initial step towards holistic ergonomic control. This study comprehensively explores existing computer vision-based biomechanical analysis methods for workload assessment, assessing their performance against traditional techniques, and categorising them for easier use. Recent strides in artificial intelligence have revolutionised workload assessment, especially in realistic work settings where conventional methods fall short. However, understanding the accuracy, characteristics, and practicality of computer vision-based methods versus traditional approaches remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, a literature review along with a meta-analysis was completed in this study to illuminate model accuracy, advantages, and challenges, offering valuable insights for refined technology implementation in diverse work environments.

基于计算机视觉的生物力学模型用于物理工作量估算的系统性文献综述。
在复杂的工作环境中,由于对体力的苛刻要求,人体工程学风险在各行各业普遍存在。通过详细的评估和有效的干预措施来应对这些挑战,可以提高安全性和员工福利。正确、及时地测量体力工作量是实现全面人体工学控制的第一步。本研究全面探讨了用于工作量评估的现有计算机视觉生物力学分析方法,评估了这些方法与传统技术相比的性能,并对这些方法进行了分类,以便于使用。人工智能领域的最新进展彻底改变了工作量评估,尤其是在传统方法无法满足的现实工作环境中。然而,人们对基于计算机视觉的方法相对于传统方法的准确性、特点和实用性的了解仍然有限。为了弥补这一知识差距,本研究通过文献综述和荟萃分析,阐明了模型的准确性、优势和挑战,为在不同工作环境中改进技术实施提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信