Outcome evaluation of ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, and FLOT chemotherapy regimens as perioperative treatment in elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer; A retrospective comparative study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_417_22
Ali Forouhari, Azadeh Moghaddas, Ali Darakhshandeh
{"title":"Outcome evaluation of ECF, DCF, FOLFOX, and FLOT chemotherapy regimens as perioperative treatment in elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer; A retrospective comparative study.","authors":"Ali Forouhari, Azadeh Moghaddas, Ali Darakhshandeh","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_417_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of gastric cancer is known to be high in the elderly population. Identification of the best perioperative chemotherapy regimen is challenging in patients with resectable gastric cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes and safety of epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF), docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), oxaliplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX), and docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FLOT) chemotherapy regimens to identify the most appropriate treatment option for elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational cohort study, data were extracted from the medical archives (2017-2021) of Omid Hospital, which is a tertiary oncology referral hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Patients with resectable gastric cancer, above 60 years of age, who were perioperatively treated with one of the mentioned chemotherapy regimens and met the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in this study. The survival parameters and safety profile of the regimens were evaluated and compared in this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period of the patients was 24 months (range, 7-51 months). The results of survival analysis revealed that the FLOT and DCF regimens were significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) as compared to the other regimens (median OS: 38 and 33 months, respectively). Based on the results, the progression-free survival was longer in the DCF regimen (median: 24 months) compared to the other regimens; however, only the difference with the ECF regimen (median: 14 months) was significant. The results of Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference in the overall adjusted hazard ratio of mortality between the FLOT and DCF regimens (<i>P</i> = 0.802). The DCF and FOLFOX regimens accounted for the highest and lowest rates of adverse events (e.g., neutropenia and mucositis), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the higher rate of adverse events in the DCF group, besides the significant improvement of OS and the acceptable adverse event profile of patients treated with the FLOT regimen, it can be proposed that this chemotherapy regimen is the most appropriate treatment option for elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10826847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_417_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of gastric cancer is known to be high in the elderly population. Identification of the best perioperative chemotherapy regimen is challenging in patients with resectable gastric cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes and safety of epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF), docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), oxaliplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX), and docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FLOT) chemotherapy regimens to identify the most appropriate treatment option for elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study, data were extracted from the medical archives (2017-2021) of Omid Hospital, which is a tertiary oncology referral hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Patients with resectable gastric cancer, above 60 years of age, who were perioperatively treated with one of the mentioned chemotherapy regimens and met the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in this study. The survival parameters and safety profile of the regimens were evaluated and compared in this population.

Results: A total of 63 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period of the patients was 24 months (range, 7-51 months). The results of survival analysis revealed that the FLOT and DCF regimens were significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) as compared to the other regimens (median OS: 38 and 33 months, respectively). Based on the results, the progression-free survival was longer in the DCF regimen (median: 24 months) compared to the other regimens; however, only the difference with the ECF regimen (median: 14 months) was significant. The results of Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference in the overall adjusted hazard ratio of mortality between the FLOT and DCF regimens (P = 0.802). The DCF and FOLFOX regimens accounted for the highest and lowest rates of adverse events (e.g., neutropenia and mucositis), respectively.

Conclusion: Considering the higher rate of adverse events in the DCF group, besides the significant improvement of OS and the acceptable adverse event profile of patients treated with the FLOT regimen, it can be proposed that this chemotherapy regimen is the most appropriate treatment option for elderly patients with resectable gastric cancer.

ECF、DCF、FOLFOX和FLOT化疗方案作为可切除胃癌老年患者围手术期治疗的效果评估;一项回顾性比较研究。
背景:众所周知,胃癌在老年人群中的发病率很高。对于可切除胃癌患者来说,确定最佳围手术期化疗方案具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估和比较表柔比星、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(ECF)、多西他赛、顺铂和 5-氟尿嘧啶(DCF)、奥沙利铂加 5-氟尿嘧啶和白血病素(FOLFOX)以及多西他赛、奥沙利铂加 5-氟尿嘧啶和白血病素(FOLFOX)的疗效和安全性、和多西他赛、奥沙利铂、亮菌素和 5-氟尿嘧啶(FLOT)化疗方案,以确定最适合可切除胃癌老年患者的治疗方案。材料和方法:在这项回顾性观察队列研究中,数据来自伊朗伊斯法罕市三级肿瘤转诊医院奥米德医院的医疗档案(2017-2021 年)。本研究招募了年龄在 60 岁以上、围手术期接受过上述化疗方案之一治疗且符合纳入标准的可切除胃癌患者。研究人员对这些患者的生存参数和化疗方案的安全性进行了评估和比较:本研究共纳入 63 名患者。中位随访期为 24 个月(7-51 个月)。生存期分析结果显示,与其他方案相比,FLOT 和 DCF 方案的总生存期(OS)明显更长(中位 OS 分别为 38 个月和 33 个月)。结果显示,DCF疗法的无进展生存期(中位数:24个月)比其他疗法更长;但只有ECF疗法的无进展生存期(中位数:14个月)差异显著。Cox回归分析结果显示,FLOT和DCF方案的总体调整后死亡率危险比无明显差异(P = 0.802)。DCF和FOLFOX方案的不良事件(如中性粒细胞减少症和粘膜炎)发生率分别最高和最低:考虑到DCF组不良反应发生率较高,而采用FLOT方案治疗的患者的OS显著改善且不良反应情况可接受,因此可以认为该化疗方案是老年可切除胃癌患者最合适的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信