Identification of Precise 3D CT Radiomics for Habitat Computation by Machine Learning in Cancer.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Olivia Prior, Carlos Macarro, Víctor Navarro, Camilo Monreal, Marta Ligero, Alonso Garcia-Ruiz, Garazi Serna, Sara Simonetti, Irene Braña, Maria Vieito, Manuel Escobar, Jaume Capdevila, Annette T Byrne, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Rodrigo Toledo, Paolo Nuciforo, Elena Garralda, Francesco Grussu, Kinga Bernatowicz, Raquel Perez-Lopez
{"title":"Identification of Precise 3D CT Radiomics for Habitat Computation by Machine Learning in Cancer.","authors":"Olivia Prior, Carlos Macarro, Víctor Navarro, Camilo Monreal, Marta Ligero, Alonso Garcia-Ruiz, Garazi Serna, Sara Simonetti, Irene Braña, Maria Vieito, Manuel Escobar, Jaume Capdevila, Annette T Byrne, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Rodrigo Toledo, Paolo Nuciforo, Elena Garralda, Francesco Grussu, Kinga Bernatowicz, Raquel Perez-Lopez","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To identify precise three-dimensional radiomics features in CT images that enable computation of stable and biologically meaningful habitats with machine learning for cancer heterogeneity assessment. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2436 liver or lung lesions from 605 CT scans (November 2010-December 2021) in 331 patients with cancer (mean age, 64.5 years ± 10.1 [SD]; 185 male patients). Three-dimensional radiomics were computed from original and perturbed (simulated retest) images with different combinations of feature computation kernel radius and bin size. The lower 95% confidence limit (LCL) of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure repeatability and reproducibility. Precise features were identified by combining repeatability and reproducibility results (LCL of ICC ≥ 0.50). Habitats were obtained with Gaussian mixture models in original and perturbed data using precise radiomics features and compared with habitats obtained using all features. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to assess habitat stability. Biologic correlates of CT habitats were explored in a case study, with a cohort of 13 patients with CT, multiparametric MRI, and tumor biopsies. Results Three-dimensional radiomics showed poor repeatability (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.442 [0.312-0.516]) and poor reproducibility against kernel radius (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.440 [0.33-0.526]) but excellent reproducibility against bin size (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.929 [0.853-0.988]). Twenty-six radiomics features were precise, differing in lung and liver lesions. Habitats obtained with precise features (DSC: median [IQR], 0.601 [0.494-0.712] and 0.651 [0.52-0.784] for lung and liver lesions, respectively) were more stable than those obtained with all features (DSC: median [IQR], 0.532 [0.424-0.637] and 0.587 [0.465-0.703] for lung and liver lesions, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). In the case study, CT habitats correlated quantitatively and qualitatively with heterogeneity observed in multiparametric MRI habitats and histology. Conclusion Precise three-dimensional radiomics features were identified on CT images that enabled tumor heterogeneity assessment through stable tumor habitat computation. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI, MRI, Radiomics, Unsupervised Learning, Oncology, Liver, Lung <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Sagreiya in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e230118"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To identify precise three-dimensional radiomics features in CT images that enable computation of stable and biologically meaningful habitats with machine learning for cancer heterogeneity assessment. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2436 liver or lung lesions from 605 CT scans (November 2010-December 2021) in 331 patients with cancer (mean age, 64.5 years ± 10.1 [SD]; 185 male patients). Three-dimensional radiomics were computed from original and perturbed (simulated retest) images with different combinations of feature computation kernel radius and bin size. The lower 95% confidence limit (LCL) of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure repeatability and reproducibility. Precise features were identified by combining repeatability and reproducibility results (LCL of ICC ≥ 0.50). Habitats were obtained with Gaussian mixture models in original and perturbed data using precise radiomics features and compared with habitats obtained using all features. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to assess habitat stability. Biologic correlates of CT habitats were explored in a case study, with a cohort of 13 patients with CT, multiparametric MRI, and tumor biopsies. Results Three-dimensional radiomics showed poor repeatability (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.442 [0.312-0.516]) and poor reproducibility against kernel radius (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.440 [0.33-0.526]) but excellent reproducibility against bin size (LCL of ICC: median [IQR], 0.929 [0.853-0.988]). Twenty-six radiomics features were precise, differing in lung and liver lesions. Habitats obtained with precise features (DSC: median [IQR], 0.601 [0.494-0.712] and 0.651 [0.52-0.784] for lung and liver lesions, respectively) were more stable than those obtained with all features (DSC: median [IQR], 0.532 [0.424-0.637] and 0.587 [0.465-0.703] for lung and liver lesions, respectively; P < .001). In the case study, CT habitats correlated quantitatively and qualitatively with heterogeneity observed in multiparametric MRI habitats and histology. Conclusion Precise three-dimensional radiomics features were identified on CT images that enabled tumor heterogeneity assessment through stable tumor habitat computation. Keywords: CT, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI, MRI, Radiomics, Unsupervised Learning, Oncology, Liver, Lung Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Sagreiya in this issue.

通过癌症中的机器学习识别用于人居计算的精确 3D CT 放射线组学。
"刚刚接受 "的论文经过同行评审,已被接受在《放射学》上发表:人工智能》上发表。这篇文章在以最终版本发表之前,还将经过校对、排版和校对审核。请注意,在制作最终校对稿的过程中,可能会发现影响内容的错误。目的 找出 CT 图像中精确的三维放射组学特征,以便利用机器学习计算稳定且具有生物学意义的生境,用于癌症异质性评估。材料和方法 该回顾性研究纳入了 318 名癌症患者(平均年龄为 64.5 岁 ± 10.1 [SD];185 名男性患者)的 605 次 CT 扫描(2010 年 11 月至 2021 年 12 月)中的 2436 个肝脏或肺部病变。根据原始图像和扰动(模拟重测)图像计算三维放射组学,并采用不同的特征计算内核半径(R)和二进制大小(B)组合。类内相关系数的 95% 置信下限 (LCL) 用于测量重复性和再现性。结合重复性和再现性结果(LCL ≥ 0.50)确定精确特征。在原始数据和扰动数据中使用高斯混合模型,利用精确的辐射组学特征获得栖息地,并与利用所有特征获得的栖息地进行比较。戴斯相似系数(DSC)用于评估栖息地的稳定性。在一项病例研究中探讨了 CT 生境的生物学相关性,研究对象是一组 13 名患者,他们都接受过 CT、多参数 MRI(mpMRI)和肿瘤活检。结果 三维放射组学显示可重复性差(中位数LCL[IQR]为0.442[0.312-0.516]),与R的可重复性差(0.44[0.33-0.526]),但与B的可重复性极佳(0.929[0.853-0.988])。有 26 个放射组学特征是精确的,在肺部和肝脏病变中有所不同。用精确特征(肺部和肝脏病变的 DSC 值分别为 0.601 (0.494-0.712) 和 0.651 (0.52-0.784))获得的栖息地比用所有特征(DSC 值分别为 0.532 (0.424-0.637) 和 0.587 (0.465-0.703); P < .001)获得的栖息地更稳定。在该病例研究中,CT 生理学与 mpMRI 生理学和组织学观察到的异质性具有定量和定性相关性。结论 在 CT 上识别出精确的三维放射组学特征,可通过稳定的肿瘤生境计算进行肿瘤异质性评估。©RSNA,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信