Minimal invasive LASER-resection vs. radiotherapy as primary treatment of early glottic cancer. A population-based study with, up to 16 years follow up of survival, rate of laryngectomy and voice function.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2023.2299674
Roland Rydell, Josefine Andreasson, Sara Gustafsson Baldwin, Nathalie Clarhed
{"title":"Minimal invasive LASER-resection <i>vs</i>. radiotherapy as primary treatment of early glottic cancer. A population-based study with, up to 16 years follow up of survival, rate of laryngectomy and voice function.","authors":"Roland Rydell, Josefine Andreasson, Sara Gustafsson Baldwin, Nathalie Clarhed","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2023.2299674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early glottic cancer can be treated with laser resection or radiotherapy. In an earlier study, we found that voice function after laser resection was inferior to that after radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to determine if reduced margins at laser resection improved voice function without impairing oncologic results.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 268 patients with previously untreated T1-T2 glottic carcinoma were studied. They were primarily treated with either radiotherapy (<i>n</i> = 119) or laser resection (<i>n</i> = 149). Survival, need for additional treatment (radiotherapy and/or total layngectomi) and voice function was compared.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Median follow up time was 7 years with range 0.5-16.6. There was no difference in the overall survival (<i>p</i> = .065) or disease-specific survival. (<i>p</i> = .126). After radiotherapy 32/119 patients and after laser resection 57/149 patients had recurrence. Total rate of laryngectomy was 24% in the radiotherapy group, and 8% in the laser resection group (<i>p</i> = .001). Voice analysis (T1A) showed more roughness in the radiotherapy group, otherwise no difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By reducing the surgical margins, we have achieved a better voice function (T1A) but more patients have needed repeated laser excisions and some have also needed supplementary radiotherapy. The risk of laryngectomy and survival were apparently not affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"58-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2299674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early glottic cancer can be treated with laser resection or radiotherapy. In an earlier study, we found that voice function after laser resection was inferior to that after radiotherapy.

Objectives: This study was designed to determine if reduced margins at laser resection improved voice function without impairing oncologic results.

Method: A total of 268 patients with previously untreated T1-T2 glottic carcinoma were studied. They were primarily treated with either radiotherapy (n = 119) or laser resection (n = 149). Survival, need for additional treatment (radiotherapy and/or total layngectomi) and voice function was compared.

Result: Median follow up time was 7 years with range 0.5-16.6. There was no difference in the overall survival (p = .065) or disease-specific survival. (p = .126). After radiotherapy 32/119 patients and after laser resection 57/149 patients had recurrence. Total rate of laryngectomy was 24% in the radiotherapy group, and 8% in the laser resection group (p = .001). Voice analysis (T1A) showed more roughness in the radiotherapy group, otherwise no difference.

Conclusions: By reducing the surgical margins, we have achieved a better voice function (T1A) but more patients have needed repeated laser excisions and some have also needed supplementary radiotherapy. The risk of laryngectomy and survival were apparently not affected.

微创激光切除术与放疗作为早期声门癌的主要治疗方法。一项基于人群的研究,对患者的生存率、喉切除率和语音功能进行了长达16年的跟踪调查。
背景:早期声门癌可采用激光切除或放射治疗。在早前的一项研究中,我们发现激光切除术后的嗓音功能不如放疗后的嗓音功能:本研究旨在确定激光切除时缩小切缘是否能在不影响肿瘤治疗效果的情况下改善嗓音功能:方法:共对268名既往未经治疗的T1-T2声门癌患者进行了研究。他们主要接受放疗(119 人)或激光切除术(149 人)。研究比较了患者的生存期、是否需要接受其他治疗(放疗和/或全喉切除术)以及嗓音功能:中位随访时间为 7 年,范围为 0.5-16.6 年。结果:中位随访时间为 7 年,范围为 0.5-16.6 年,总生存率(P = 0.065)和疾病特异性生存率(P = 0.126)均无差异。(p = .126).放疗后有 32/119 例患者复发,激光切除后有 57/149 例患者复发。放疗组的喉切除总率为24%,激光切除组为8%(p = .001)。嗓音分析(T1A)显示放疗组的嗓音更粗糙,其他方面无差异:通过缩小手术切缘,我们获得了更好的嗓音功能(T1A),但更多患者需要重复激光切除,有些患者还需要辅助放疗。喉切除术的风险和存活率显然没有受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信