Microbiología clásica y molecular en el diagnóstico de la endocarditis infecciosa

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"Microbiología clásica y molecular en el diagnóstico de la endocarditis infecciosa","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>In recent years, molecular techniques for the aetiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) have attained relevance; however, they are not implemented in all laboratories. Our objective is to evaluate the usefulness of broad-spectrum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique followed by sequencing (universal PCR) on valve tissue as part of the IE diagnostic practice and to compare the results with classical methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Universal PCR showed a higher sensitivity than valve culture (80.8 vs 27.1%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) and allowed the identification of the causative agent or the confirmation of the aetiological diagnosis in case of discordance in 7.7% of patients. Regarding conventional diagnosis, blood culture stands out as the reference technique and Gram staining due to its high positive predictive value. The highest sensitivity and specificity was obtained considering classical and molecular microbiology together. The anatomopathological study presented a sensitivity of 83.9% and made it possible to assess the results of the microbiological diagnosis when there were discrepancies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Universal PCR proved to be a valuable technique that completes the classical diagnosis. In an entity as complex as IE, it is necessary to use all the diagnostic tools at our disposal. All areas of laboratory diagnosis are complementary and not exclusive and should be assessed together.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 3","pages":"Pages 191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

In recent years, molecular techniques for the aetiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) have attained relevance; however, they are not implemented in all laboratories. Our objective is to evaluate the usefulness of broad-spectrum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique followed by sequencing (universal PCR) on valve tissue as part of the IE diagnostic practice and to compare the results with classical methods.

Results

Universal PCR showed a higher sensitivity than valve culture (80.8 vs 27.1%, P < .001) and allowed the identification of the causative agent or the confirmation of the aetiological diagnosis in case of discordance in 7.7% of patients. Regarding conventional diagnosis, blood culture stands out as the reference technique and Gram staining due to its high positive predictive value. The highest sensitivity and specificity was obtained considering classical and molecular microbiology together. The anatomopathological study presented a sensitivity of 83.9% and made it possible to assess the results of the microbiological diagnosis when there were discrepancies.

Conclusions

Universal PCR proved to be a valuable technique that completes the classical diagnosis. In an entity as complex as IE, it is necessary to use all the diagnostic tools at our disposal. All areas of laboratory diagnosis are complementary and not exclusive and should be assessed together.

诊断感染性心内膜炎的经典和分子微生物学方法
引言和目的近年来,用于感染性心内膜炎(IE)病原学诊断的分子技术已具有重要意义;但并非所有实验室都采用了这些技术。我们的目的是评估广谱聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术和测序(通用 PCR)在瓣膜组织上作为 IE 诊断实践的实用性,并将结果与传统方法进行比较。结果 通用 PCR 的灵敏度高于瓣膜培养(80.8% 对 27.1%,P < .001),在 7.7% 的患者中,通用 PCR 可以识别致病菌或在不一致的情况下确认病原学诊断。在常规诊断方面,血液培养和革兰氏染色因其较高的阳性预测值而成为最佳参考技术。传统微生物学和分子微生物学的敏感性和特异性最高。解剖病理学研究的灵敏度为 83.9%,当微生物学诊断结果出现差异时,可以对其进行评估。对于像 IE 这样复杂的疾病,有必要使用我们所掌握的所有诊断工具。实验室诊断的所有领域都是互补的,而不是排斥的,因此应一并进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信