Technical alternatives for coke oven gas utilization in China: A comparative analysis of environment-economic-strategic perspectives

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zichen Di , Feixia Lei , Jiankai Jing , Hao Peng , Xi Lu , Fangqin Cheng
{"title":"Technical alternatives for coke oven gas utilization in China: A comparative analysis of environment-economic-strategic perspectives","authors":"Zichen Di ,&nbsp;Feixia Lei ,&nbsp;Jiankai Jing ,&nbsp;Hao Peng ,&nbsp;Xi Lu ,&nbsp;Fangqin Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2024.100395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China is the largest coke producer and consumer. There is a pressing need to address the high emissions of air pollutants and carbon dioxide associated with traditional coking production. As the nation pursues a transition towards carbon neutrality, expanding supply chains for coking plants to produce hydrogen, methanol, and other green alternatives has garnered significant attention. However, the relative advantages of these strategies have remained uncertain. In this study, we integrate a life cycle assessment-economic analysis-scenario analysis model to evaluate various coke oven gas (COG) utilization routes (COGtM: COG-to-methanol, COGtLNG: COG-to-liquefied natural gas, COGtSA: COG-to-synthetic ammonia, and COGtH: COG-to-hydrogen). The results indicate that COGtSA emerges as the preferred option for balancing environmental and economic benefits. Meanwhile, COGtM demonstrates economic viability but is associated with higher environmental impacts. Despite being recognized as a significant strategic direction under carbon neutrality initiatives, COGtH faces economic feasibility and risk resilience limitations. COGtLNG encounters both financial and environmental challenges, necessitating strategic development from an energy security perspective. The projected coking capacity is anticipated to experience a slight increase in the mid-term yet a significant decline in the long term, influenced by steel production capacity. In potential future markets, COGtM is estimated to potentially capture a maximum market share of 16–34% in the methanol market. Furthermore, against the backdrop of continuously expanding potential demand for hydrogen, COGtH holds advantages as a transitional solution, but in the long run, it can only meet a small portion of the market. COGtSA can meet 7–14% of market demand and emerges as the most viable pathway from the viewpoint of balancing environmental and economic aspects and covering future markets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100395"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000097/pdfft?md5=b0b34a7088b8b1d1016ff07a390f8a4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666498424000097-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is the largest coke producer and consumer. There is a pressing need to address the high emissions of air pollutants and carbon dioxide associated with traditional coking production. As the nation pursues a transition towards carbon neutrality, expanding supply chains for coking plants to produce hydrogen, methanol, and other green alternatives has garnered significant attention. However, the relative advantages of these strategies have remained uncertain. In this study, we integrate a life cycle assessment-economic analysis-scenario analysis model to evaluate various coke oven gas (COG) utilization routes (COGtM: COG-to-methanol, COGtLNG: COG-to-liquefied natural gas, COGtSA: COG-to-synthetic ammonia, and COGtH: COG-to-hydrogen). The results indicate that COGtSA emerges as the preferred option for balancing environmental and economic benefits. Meanwhile, COGtM demonstrates economic viability but is associated with higher environmental impacts. Despite being recognized as a significant strategic direction under carbon neutrality initiatives, COGtH faces economic feasibility and risk resilience limitations. COGtLNG encounters both financial and environmental challenges, necessitating strategic development from an energy security perspective. The projected coking capacity is anticipated to experience a slight increase in the mid-term yet a significant decline in the long term, influenced by steel production capacity. In potential future markets, COGtM is estimated to potentially capture a maximum market share of 16–34% in the methanol market. Furthermore, against the backdrop of continuously expanding potential demand for hydrogen, COGtH holds advantages as a transitional solution, but in the long run, it can only meet a small portion of the market. COGtSA can meet 7–14% of market demand and emerges as the most viable pathway from the viewpoint of balancing environmental and economic aspects and covering future markets.

Abstract Image

中国焦炉煤气利用的技术替代方案:环境-经济-战略视角的比较分析
中国是最大的焦炭生产国和消费国。传统焦化生产过程中排放大量空气污染物和二氧化碳,解决这一问题迫在眉睫。随着中国向碳中和过渡,扩大焦化厂供应链以生产氢气、甲醇和其他绿色替代品已引起广泛关注。然而,这些战略的相对优势仍不确定。在本研究中,我们整合了生命周期评估-经济分析-情景分析模型,以评估各种焦炉煤气(COG)利用路线(COGtM:COG-to-甲醇;COGtLNG:COG-to-液化天然气;COGtSA:COG-to-合成氨):COGtSA:COG-合成氨,以及 COGtH:COG-氢气)。结果表明,COGtSA 是兼顾环境和经济效益的首选方案。同时,COGtM 具有经济可行性,但对环境的影响较大。尽管 COGtH 被认为是碳中和倡议下的一个重要战略方向,但它面临着经济可行性和风险抵御能力的限制。COGtLNG 面临财务和环境两方面的挑战,需要从能源安全的角度进行战略开发。受钢铁产能的影响,预计焦化产能在中期将略有增加,但在长期将大幅下降。在未来的潜在市场中,预计 COGtM 有可能在甲醇市场中占据 16%-34% 的最大市场份额。此外,在氢气潜在需求不断扩大的背景下,COGtH 作为过渡性解决方案具有优势,但从长远来看,它只能满足一小部分市场。COGtSA 可以满足 7-14% 的市场需求,从平衡环境和经济方面以及覆盖未来市场的角度来看,COGtSA 是最可行的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信