Embodied impacts of buildings from energy-carbon-water nexus perspective: A case study of university buildings

M.K. Dixit , P. Pradeep Kumar
{"title":"Embodied impacts of buildings from energy-carbon-water nexus perspective: A case study of university buildings","authors":"M.K. Dixit ,&nbsp;P. Pradeep Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.cles.2024.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite extensive investment in energy efficiency efforts, the energy footprint of the building sector still contains over 40 % of the world's annual consumption of energy. Although most of a building's life cycle energy use comes from operational activities, a portion of it stems from embodied energy (EE), which is directly expended in a building's construction and indirectly consumed using materials. Because each material consumes not only different amounts but also different types of energy sources, studying embodied carbon (EC) is equally important. The building construction sector also consumes nearly 1/5th of global fresh water, which is becoming a grave concern, given the increasing frequency of droughts and wildfires. The fact that material manufacturing and construction processes also consume water makes it essential to not just assess energy and carbon but also embodied water (EW). The literature recommends evaluating total EW including direct and indirect EW as well as any EW associated with EE use. In this paper, macroeconomic models are utilized to compute and analyze the energy, carbon emission, and water embodied in four university buildings. The results show that the total EE, EC, and EW values for the four case study buildings vary from 13.1 to 51.1 GJ/m<sup>2</sup>, 1.4–10.0 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>2</sup>, and 2,820–12,900 gal./m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The EE values also show a near perfect positive correlation with EW values. However, the share of EREW in the total EW ranges from 13 % to 16 %, indicating that a decrease in EE use may not help decrease a majority of EW.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100252,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Energy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783124000025/pdfft?md5=ccab8e5cea28b01289f137261a1cd676&pid=1-s2.0-S2772783124000025-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783124000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite extensive investment in energy efficiency efforts, the energy footprint of the building sector still contains over 40 % of the world's annual consumption of energy. Although most of a building's life cycle energy use comes from operational activities, a portion of it stems from embodied energy (EE), which is directly expended in a building's construction and indirectly consumed using materials. Because each material consumes not only different amounts but also different types of energy sources, studying embodied carbon (EC) is equally important. The building construction sector also consumes nearly 1/5th of global fresh water, which is becoming a grave concern, given the increasing frequency of droughts and wildfires. The fact that material manufacturing and construction processes also consume water makes it essential to not just assess energy and carbon but also embodied water (EW). The literature recommends evaluating total EW including direct and indirect EW as well as any EW associated with EE use. In this paper, macroeconomic models are utilized to compute and analyze the energy, carbon emission, and water embodied in four university buildings. The results show that the total EE, EC, and EW values for the four case study buildings vary from 13.1 to 51.1 GJ/m2, 1.4–10.0 kgCO2/m2, and 2,820–12,900 gal./m2, respectively. The EE values also show a near perfect positive correlation with EW values. However, the share of EREW in the total EW ranges from 13 % to 16 %, indicating that a decrease in EE use may not help decrease a majority of EW.

Abstract Image

从能源-碳-水关系角度看建筑物的体现影响:大学建筑案例研究
尽管在提高能效方面进行了大量投资,但建筑行业的能源足迹仍占全球年度能源消耗的 40% 以上。尽管建筑生命周期中的大部分能源消耗来自运营活动,但也有一部分能源消耗来自建筑物建造过程中的直接消耗和材料的间接消耗。由于每种材料不仅消耗不同数量的能源,而且消耗不同类型的能源,因此研究内含碳(EC)也同样重要。建筑施工部门还消耗了全球近 1/5 的淡水,鉴于干旱和野火日益频繁,这已成为一个令人严重关切的问题。事实上,材料制造和施工过程也会消耗水资源,因此不仅要评估能源和碳,还要评估体现水(EW)。文献建议评估总的 EW,包括直接和间接 EW,以及与 EE 使用相关的任何 EW。本文利用宏观经济模型计算和分析了四座大学建筑的能源、碳排放和内含水量。结果表明,四座案例研究建筑的总能源效率(EE)、总碳排放量(EC)和总能耗(EW)值分别为 13.1 至 51.1 GJ/m2、1.4 至 10.0 kgCO2/m2 和 2,820 至 12,900 gal./m2。EE 值与 EW 值也几乎完全正相关。然而,EREW 在总 EW 中的比例从 13 % 到 16 % 不等,这表明减少 EE 的使用可能无助于减少大部分 EW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信