Effects of multicomponent training based on RPE on functional capacity and body composition in institutionalized elderly undergoing physiotherapeutic treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Ana Beatrice Carvalho , Alex Silva Ribeiro , Marília Leite dos Santos , Eduardo Lusa Cadore , Ewertton de Souza Bezerra
{"title":"Effects of multicomponent training based on RPE on functional capacity and body composition in institutionalized elderly undergoing physiotherapeutic treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"Ana Beatrice Carvalho ,&nbsp;Alex Silva Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Marília Leite dos Santos ,&nbsp;Eduardo Lusa Cadore ,&nbsp;Ewertton de Souza Bezerra","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of the current study was to verify the effects of adding multicomponent training based on the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) on physical functional capacity and body composition in institutionalized older adults undergoing physiotherapeutic treatment. Twenty-three older people (12♀) were randomly allocated in blocks, according to their classification level in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), into a control group (CG, <em>n</em> = 11) and a multicomponent training group (MT, <em>n</em> = 12). The primary outcome measures were evaluated by the SPPB. Secondary outcomes were performance in the TUG test and 6-meter walking speed test, and body composition analysis. For all analyses, we used ANOVA two way with Bonferroni correction, and estimation statistics, which focus on the effect size of the experiment/intervention, as opposed to significance testing. Regarding the effect size (Cohen's D) in the intergroup analysis, the SPPB score showed a large effect favoring the multicomponent training group (<em>d</em> = 0.803 [CI 95.0 % -0.387, 1.89]; <em>p</em> = 0.0996). Similar responses were observed for the 6 m walking speed test, showing a large effect (<em>d</em>= -0.857 [CI 95.0 % - 1.53, 0.176]; <em>p</em> = 0.768), and TUG (<em>d</em>= -1.18 [CI 95.0 % -2.08, -0.206]; <em>p</em> = 0.0254. In the Body composition outcomes, the phase angle (<em>d</em> = 0.212 [CI 95.0 % -0.721. 1.17]; <em>p</em> = 0.616) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (<em>d</em>= -0.242 [CI 95.0 % -1.15.0.659]; <em>p</em> = 0.56) showed a small effect size. The current study demonstrated that the multicomponent training program associated with the physiotherapy program produces effects that can increase SPPB scores, as well improving physiotherapy performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000043/pdfft?md5=fc5c771f7e27e176721803eaec966cd7&pid=1-s2.0-S2950307824000043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to verify the effects of adding multicomponent training based on the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) on physical functional capacity and body composition in institutionalized older adults undergoing physiotherapeutic treatment. Twenty-three older people (12♀) were randomly allocated in blocks, according to their classification level in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), into a control group (CG, n = 11) and a multicomponent training group (MT, n = 12). The primary outcome measures were evaluated by the SPPB. Secondary outcomes were performance in the TUG test and 6-meter walking speed test, and body composition analysis. For all analyses, we used ANOVA two way with Bonferroni correction, and estimation statistics, which focus on the effect size of the experiment/intervention, as opposed to significance testing. Regarding the effect size (Cohen's D) in the intergroup analysis, the SPPB score showed a large effect favoring the multicomponent training group (d = 0.803 [CI 95.0 % -0.387, 1.89]; p = 0.0996). Similar responses were observed for the 6 m walking speed test, showing a large effect (d= -0.857 [CI 95.0 % - 1.53, 0.176]; p = 0.768), and TUG (d= -1.18 [CI 95.0 % -2.08, -0.206]; p = 0.0254. In the Body composition outcomes, the phase angle (d = 0.212 [CI 95.0 % -0.721. 1.17]; p = 0.616) and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (d= -0.242 [CI 95.0 % -1.15.0.659]; p = 0.56) showed a small effect size. The current study demonstrated that the multicomponent training program associated with the physiotherapy program produces effects that can increase SPPB scores, as well improving physiotherapy performance.

基于 RPE 的多成分训练对接受物理治疗的居家老人的功能能力和身体成分的影响:随机对照临床试验
本研究旨在验证在感知用力率(RPE)的基础上增加多成分训练对接受理疗的机构老年人的身体机能和身体成分的影响。23名老年人(12♀)根据他们在短期体能测试(SPPB)中的分级水平被随机分配到对照组(CG,n = 11)和多组分训练组(MT,n = 12)。主要结果由 SPPB 评估。次要结果是 TUG 测试和 6 米步行速度测试中的表现,以及身体成分分析。在所有分析中,我们都使用了带 Bonferroni 校正的双向方差分析和估计统计,其重点是实验/干预的效应大小,而不是显著性检验。关于组间分析中的效应大小(Cohen's D),SPPB 评分显示出有利于多组分训练组的巨大效应(d = 0.803 [CI 95.0 % -0.387, 1.89]; p = 0.0996)。在 6 米步行速度测试中也观察到了类似的反应,显示出较大的影响(d= -0.857 [CI 95.0 % - 1.53, 0.176];p = 0.768)和 TUG(d=-1.18 [CI 95.0 % -2.08, -0.206];p = 0.0254)。在身体成分结果中,相位角(d= 0.212 [CI 95.0 % -0.721. 1.17];p = 0.616)和骨骼肌质量(d= -0.242 [CI 95.0 % -1.15.0.659]; p = 0.56)显示出较小的效应大小。目前的研究表明,与物理治疗计划相关的多成分训练计划能够提高 SPPB 分数,并改善物理治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信