Effect of functional knee loading on articular cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time and thickness in patients at risk for knee osteoarthritis

Hayden F. Atkinson , Trevor B. Birmingham , Codie A. Primeau , Anthony A. Gatti , Rebecca F. Moyer , Jaques S. Milner , David W. Holdsworth , J. Robert Giffin
{"title":"Effect of functional knee loading on articular cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time and thickness in patients at risk for knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Hayden F. Atkinson ,&nbsp;Trevor B. Birmingham ,&nbsp;Codie A. Primeau ,&nbsp;Anthony A. Gatti ,&nbsp;Rebecca F. Moyer ,&nbsp;Jaques S. Milner ,&nbsp;David W. Holdsworth ,&nbsp;J. Robert Giffin","doi":"10.1016/j.ostima.2024.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate the effect of a functional loading stimulus on MRI-acquired T2 relaxation time (T2) and thickness of knee articular cartilage, and 2) to compare the response between patients at risk for knee OA and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A total of 32 participants (16 healthy controls [24.7 ± 3.0 years], and 16 at-risk participants [37.5 ± 12.2]) underwent 3T MRI T2 mapping scans immediately before and after a standardized 25-minute functional loading stimulus on a computerized treadmill that included a variety of challenging walking conditions. Groups were defined using the Osteoarthritis Initiative Control (healthy) and Incidence Cohort (at-risk) Criteria. We analyzed changes in T2 between groups in the superficial and deep layers of tibiofemoral, patellar, and trochlear cartilage, and for tibiofemoral cartilage thickness using multivariate linear mixed-effects models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>T2 was shorter in the superficial cartilage layers in both groups. The mean combined change (95 % confidence interval) in T2 of the superficial layer was -3.80 ms (-4.87; -2.73) for at-risk participants and -3.89 ms (-4.96; -2.82) for healthy controls. The between-group difference in change was 0.09 ms (-1.04; 1.22). There was a decrease in articular cartilage thickness in the lateral compartment for healthy controls (-0.14 mm [-0.24; -0.04]), otherwise there were no changes detected.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consistently shorter T2 was observed in the articular cartilage of patients at risk for knee OA and in healthy controls, after a challenging walking test, but with no concurrent change in cartilage thickness, suggesting a similar articular cartilage response to functional loading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74378,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis imaging","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654124000011/pdfft?md5=09a9c3b0461d441578786f1cf5cca52e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772654124000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772654124000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate the effect of a functional loading stimulus on MRI-acquired T2 relaxation time (T2) and thickness of knee articular cartilage, and 2) to compare the response between patients at risk for knee OA and healthy controls.

Design

A total of 32 participants (16 healthy controls [24.7 ± 3.0 years], and 16 at-risk participants [37.5 ± 12.2]) underwent 3T MRI T2 mapping scans immediately before and after a standardized 25-minute functional loading stimulus on a computerized treadmill that included a variety of challenging walking conditions. Groups were defined using the Osteoarthritis Initiative Control (healthy) and Incidence Cohort (at-risk) Criteria. We analyzed changes in T2 between groups in the superficial and deep layers of tibiofemoral, patellar, and trochlear cartilage, and for tibiofemoral cartilage thickness using multivariate linear mixed-effects models.

Results

T2 was shorter in the superficial cartilage layers in both groups. The mean combined change (95 % confidence interval) in T2 of the superficial layer was -3.80 ms (-4.87; -2.73) for at-risk participants and -3.89 ms (-4.96; -2.82) for healthy controls. The between-group difference in change was 0.09 ms (-1.04; 1.22). There was a decrease in articular cartilage thickness in the lateral compartment for healthy controls (-0.14 mm [-0.24; -0.04]), otherwise there were no changes detected.

Conclusions

Consistently shorter T2 was observed in the articular cartilage of patients at risk for knee OA and in healthy controls, after a challenging walking test, but with no concurrent change in cartilage thickness, suggesting a similar articular cartilage response to functional loading.

膝关节功能性负荷对膝关节骨关节炎高危患者关节软骨磁共振成像 T2 驰豫时间和厚度的影响
目标本研究的目标是1)评估功能性加载刺激对 MRI 获取的 T2 松弛时间(T2)和膝关节软骨厚度的影响;2)比较膝关节 OA 高危患者和健康对照组的反应。共有 32 名参与者(16 名健康对照组[24.7 ± 3.0 岁]和 16 名高危参与者[37.5 ± 12.2])在计算机化跑步机上接受了标准化的 25 分钟功能负荷刺激(包括各种具有挑战性的行走条件),在刺激前后立即接受了 3T MRI T2 mapping 扫描。根据骨关节炎倡议对照组(健康组)和发病队列组(高危组)的标准对两组进行了界定。我们使用多变量线性混合效应模型分析了不同组间胫骨软骨、髌骨软骨和蹄骨软骨浅层和深层的 T2 变化,以及胫骨软骨厚度的变化。高危人群浅层软骨T2的平均综合变化(95%置信区间)为-3.80 ms (-4.87; -2.73),健康对照组为-3.89 ms (-4.96; -2.82)。组间变化差异为 0.09 毫秒(-1.04;1.22)。结论高危膝关节OA患者和健康对照组在进行高难度步行测试后,其关节软骨的T2持续缩短,但软骨厚度没有同时发生变化,这表明关节软骨对功能负荷的反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis imaging
Osteoarthritis imaging Radiology and Imaging
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信