Black Disadvantage or Advantage? Misalignment between State and Popular Understandings of Blackness in Mexico

C. Sue, Fernando Riosmena, E. Telles
{"title":"Black Disadvantage or Advantage? Misalignment between State and Popular Understandings of Blackness in Mexico","authors":"C. Sue, Fernando Riosmena, E. Telles","doi":"10.1177/23780231231217821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing numbers of countries are including ethnoracial questions on their national censuses, spawning new scholarship on the politics of state classification and ethnoracial stratification. However, these literatures have generally not focused on how alignment or misalignment between state and popular conceptualizations of ethnoracial categories affects official measurements, including population size and ethnoracial inequality. The authors leverage a quasi-natural experiment on state-popular alignment in Mexico by drawing on three recent government surveys, which, for the first time in the nation’s history, sought to measure black identification yet defined blackness in divergent ways. The authors find that questions that define blackness in cultural terms (which misalign with popular conceptions of blackness) produce substantially smaller population estimates and considerably less black disadvantage than a noncultural (racial origins) question. This article bridges the literatures on the politics of ethnoracial classification and stratification and produces new empirical and theoretical insights into the study of ethnoracial measurement and inequality.","PeriodicalId":513351,"journal":{"name":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231217821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing numbers of countries are including ethnoracial questions on their national censuses, spawning new scholarship on the politics of state classification and ethnoracial stratification. However, these literatures have generally not focused on how alignment or misalignment between state and popular conceptualizations of ethnoracial categories affects official measurements, including population size and ethnoracial inequality. The authors leverage a quasi-natural experiment on state-popular alignment in Mexico by drawing on three recent government surveys, which, for the first time in the nation’s history, sought to measure black identification yet defined blackness in divergent ways. The authors find that questions that define blackness in cultural terms (which misalign with popular conceptions of blackness) produce substantially smaller population estimates and considerably less black disadvantage than a noncultural (racial origins) question. This article bridges the literatures on the politics of ethnoracial classification and stratification and produces new empirical and theoretical insights into the study of ethnoracial measurement and inequality.
黑人的劣势还是优势?墨西哥国家和民众对黑人的理解不一致
越来越多的国家在全国人口普查中纳入了人种问题,从而催生了关于国家分类和人种分层政治的新学术研究。然而,这些文献通常并不关注国家和民众对人种类别概念的一致或不一致如何影响官方测量,包括人口规模和人种不平等。作者利用墨西哥最近的三次政府调查,对州与民众之间的一致性进行了一次准自然实验,这在墨西哥历史上还是第一次。作者发现,与非文化(种族起源)问题相比,从文化角度定义黑人的问题(与流行的黑人概念不一致)产生的人口估计数要少得多,黑人的不利处境也要少得多。这篇文章沟通了有关人种分类和分层政治的文献,为人种测量和不平等研究提供了新的经验和理论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信