Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts

Sarah A. Mullen , Emma L. Myers , Rebecca L. Brenner , Kim T. Nguyen , Tara A. Harper , Darby Welsh , Storm Keffer , Jenna Mueller , Melodi Javid Whitley
{"title":"Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts","authors":"Sarah A. Mullen ,&nbsp;Emma L. Myers ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Brenner ,&nbsp;Kim T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Tara A. Harper ,&nbsp;Darby Welsh ,&nbsp;Storm Keffer ,&nbsp;Jenna Mueller ,&nbsp;Melodi Javid Whitley","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27–90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45–87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25–84% and 40–96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109/pdfft?md5=cf21b5dcafa5a1711fe7695ee5532160&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intralesional therapies are used for recalcitrant warts, but no Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment exists nor is there consensus regarding the most efficacious therapy. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize efficacy and adverse events reported in 62 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. The most studied intralesional therapies included measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine (n = 24 studies), purified protein derivative (PPD) (n = 19 studies), vitamin D3 (n = 15 studies), and Candida antigen (n = 14 studies). Most studies included adult and pediatric patients or adults alone, with only 4 studies on pediatric patients alone. MMR vaccine was the most studied treatment (n = 853 patients). MMR had a complete response rate of 27–90%. The next most common treatment, PPD, had a complete response rate of 45–87%. Other treatments included Candida antigen and vitamin D3, with complete response rates of 25–84% and 40–96%, respectively. The most frequent side effects were injection-site reactions and flu-like symptoms. This systematic review represents a useful summary of intralesional therapy RCTs for clinician reference. This study also highlights the lack of large multi-institutional RCTs, despite many patients being treated for this widespread problem.

皮肤疣局部治疗方法的系统性综述
局部注射疗法可用于治疗顽固性疣,但目前还没有一种治疗方法获得美国食品和药物管理局的批准,也没有就最有效的疗法达成共识。因此,本系统综述旨在总结62项皮肤疣局部疗法随机对照试验(RCT)的疗效和不良反应。研究最多的鞘内疗法包括麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹(MMR)疫苗(24 项研究)、纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)(19 项研究)、维生素 D3(15 项研究)和念珠菌抗原(14 项研究)。大多数研究包括成人和儿童患者或仅包括成人患者,仅有 4 项研究仅针对儿童患者。麻风腮疫苗是研究最多的治疗方法(n = 853 例患者)。麻风腮疫苗的完全应答率为 27-90%。其次是 PPD,完全应答率为 45-87%。其他治疗方法包括念珠菌抗原和维生素 D3,完全应答率分别为 25-84% 和 40-96%。最常见的副作用是注射部位反应和流感样症状。本系统综述是对局部内治疗 RCT 的有益总结,可供临床医生参考。本研究还强调,尽管有很多患者正在接受这一普遍问题的治疗,但缺乏大型多机构 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信